Cited by 181Mental Health Treatment and AccessSchizophrenia research and treatmentPsychology and Mental Health

Mental health-related stigma and pathways to care for people at risk of psychotic disorders or experiencing first-episode psychosis: a systematic review

Open access
Gronholm, P. C., Thornicroft, G., Laurens, K. R., Evans-Lacko, S.·2017·Psychological Medicine

Abstract

Background: Stigma associated with mental illness can delay or prevent help-seeking and service contact. Stigma-related influences on pathways to care in the early stages of psychotic disorders have not been systematically examined. Method: This review systematically assessed findings from qualitative, quantitative and mixed-methods research studies on the relationship between stigma and pathways to care (i.e. processes associated with help-seeking and health service contact) among people experiencing first-episode psychosis or at clinically defined increased risk of developing psychotic disorder. Forty studies were identified through searches of electronic databases (CINAHL, EMBASE, Medline, PsycINFO, Sociological Abstracts) from 1996 to 2016, supplemented by reference searches and expert consultations. Data synthesis involved thematic analysis of qualitative findings, narrative synthesis of quantitative findings, and a meta-synthesis combining these results. Results: The meta-synthesis identified six themes in relation to stigma on pathways to care among the target population: ‘sense of difference’, ‘characterizing difference negatively’, ‘negative reactions (anticipated and experienced)’, ‘strategies’, ‘lack of knowledge and understanding’, and ‘service-related factors’. This synthesis constitutes a comprehensive overview of the current evidence regarding stigma and pathways to care at early stages of psychotic disorders, and illustrates the complex manner in which stigma-related processes can influence help-seeking and service contact among first-episode psychosis and at-risk groups. Conclusions: Our findings can serve as a foundation for future research in the area, and inform early intervention efforts and approaches to mitigate stigma-related concerns that currently influence recognition of early difficulties and contribute to delayed help-seeking and access to care.

AI snapshot

Written from the paper’s full text.

TL;DR

This systematic mixed-studies review synthesized 40 studies on mental health-related stigma and pathways to care among people at risk of psychotic disorders or experiencing first-episode psychosis (FEP). It identified six themes showing how stigma-related processes can delay help-seeking and service contact, though quantitative associations were often not statistically significant.

Key findings

  • From 8,544 non-duplicated records, 40 studies met inclusion: 31/40 (77.5%) qualitative, 7/40 (17.5%) quantitative, and 2/40 (5.0%) mixed-methods; 31/40 (77.5%) considered FEP populations.
  • Qualitative synthesis (33 articles; 541 people) yielded six themes: ‘sense of difference’, ‘characterizing difference negatively’, ‘negative reactions (anticipated and experienced)’, ‘strategies’, ‘lack of knowledge and understanding’, and ‘service-related factors’.
  • Quantitative synthesis (9 articles; 692 people) found some significant associations: increased perceived stigma among at-risk people from baseline to 1-year follow-up was associated with more negative help-seeking attitudes for psychotherapy at follow-up; lower baseline stigma stress was associated with more positive help-seeking attitudes toward psychotherapy and psychiatric medication, while increased stigma stress at 1 year was associated with more negative attitudes toward psychotherapy only.
  • However, quantitative associations between stigma and pathways to care were often not statistically significant; descriptive findings included service-stigma as a reason for opposing psychiatric treatment in FEP, shame as the main reason for non-disclosure, and relatives’ concern about loved ones being labelled ‘mad’ as a frequent reason for not contacting psychiatric services.

Methods

  • Systematic mixed-studies review registered at PROSPERO (CRD42014009206) and reported per PRISMA; five databases (CINAHL, EMBASE, Medline, PsycINFO, Sociological Abstracts) were searched in July 2016 for 1996–2016 English, human studies of people aged ≤40 years.
  • Inclusion required data-based, peer-reviewed qualitative, quantitative, or mixed-methods studies assessing stigma in relation to pathways to care among people at risk of psychotic disorder or experiencing FEP; 40 studies were included.
  • Synthesis used thematic analysis of qualitative findings, narrative synthesis of quantitative findings, and a meta-synthesis combining them; methodological quality was assessed with the Mixed Methods Appraisal Tool (MMAT), with planned sensitivity and subgroup analyses.

Limitations

  • Stated by the authors: the search may not have captured all relevant articles and database choice may have limited it; only published peer-reviewed papers were included; qualitative synthesis was primarily conducted by the main author; quantitative results could only be narratively synthesized due to methodological/conceptual heterogeneity; studies were primarily from high-income/Western countries, limiting generalizability; insufficient studies examined culture/ethnicity; and non-stigma barriers also affect pathways to care.
  • Evident from the text: the evidence base is heavily qualitative (31/40, 77.5%), with few quantitative (7/40) and mixed-methods (2/40) studies; MMR studies had poor MMAT ratings (0.0% and 37.5%), and the planned subgroup comparison for significant others of at-risk individuals was prevented by absence of studies.

Model-written summary. Check it against the paper before relying on it.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1017/s0033291717000344

Cites

53 of 53 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Nothing to recompute.

Claims the paper makes

0 of 40 cited sources checked · 0 supported · 0 flagged

  • Findingcitation

    At 1-year follow up, increased stigma stress since baseline was associated with more negative help-seeking attitudes towards psychotherapy only among people at risk of psychosis.

    “Lower stigma stress among people at risk of psychosis was associated with more positive help-seeking attitudes towards both psychotherapy and psychiatric medication at baseline (Rüsch et al. 2013), whereas at 1-year follow up increased stigma stress since baseline was associated with more negative help-seeking attitudes towards psychotherapy only (Xu et al. 2016).”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Xu et al. 2016

      Not checked in the free run.

  • Findingcitation

    Service-stigma was a reason for opposing psychiatric treatment among people with FEP.

    “In quantitative descriptive studies, service-stigma was a reason for opposing psychiatric treatment among people with FEP, and shame was the main reason for nondisclosure of symptoms (de Haan et al. 2002).”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites de Haan et al. 2002

      Not checked in the free run.

  • Findingown data

    Considering findings regarding service-specific stigma, facilitating features were reported among a higher proportion of articles considering at-risk groups.

    “Considering findings regarding service-specific stigma, deterring factors were reported among a higher proportion of FEP studies, whereas facilitating features were reported among a higher proportion of articles considering at-risk groups.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Findingown data

    Findings reflecting 'sense of difference' were reported more often among FEP populations than at-risk groups.

    “In contrast, findings reflecting 'sense of difference' were reported more often among FEP populations.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Findingown data

    The meta-synthesis identified six themes in relation to stigma on pathways to care among people at risk of psychotic disorders or experiencing first-episode psychosis: 'sense of difference', 'characterizing difference negatively', 'negative reactions (anticipated and experienced)', 'strategies', 'lack of knowledge and understanding', and 'service-related factors'.

    “The meta-synthesis identified six themes in relation to stigma on pathways to care among the target population: 'sense of difference', 'characterizing difference negatively', 'negative reactions (anticipated and experienced)', 'strategies', 'lack of knowledge and understanding', and 'service-related factors'.”
    • Also stated in: § Qualitative synthesis · plain
      “Six themes and 23 subthemes describing stigma and pathways to care among people experiencing FEP or at risk of psychosis were identified.These themes were: 'sense of difference', 'characterizing differences negatively', 'negative reactions (anticipated and experienced)', 'strategies', 'lack of knowledge and understanding', 'service-related factors'.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • May combine two claims. 21
  • Classified as probably not a substantial claim. 18
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingcitation

    People at risk of psychosis reported reduced internalized stigma following cognitive therapy, but so did those who did not receive therapy.

    “People at risk of psychosis reported reduced internalized stigma following cognitive therapy, but so did those who did not receive therapy (Morrison et al. 2013).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Morrison et al. 2013

      Not checked in the free run.

  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Findingown data

    Based on quantitative findings only, the subtheme 'using personal resources to cope with stress of stigma' was added to the 'strategies' theme.

    “Subsequently, based on quantitative findings only, the subtheme 'using personal resources to cope with stress of stigma' was added to the 'strategies' theme.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingown data

    The methodological quality of the included qualitative studies was overall good; MMAT ratings ranged from 37.5% to 100.0%, but nearly all met >50.0% of the criteria (87.1%, 27/31).

    “The methodological quality of the included qualitative studies was overall good; MMAT ratings ranged from 37.5% to 100.0%, but nearly all met >50.0% of the criteria (87.1%, 27/31).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.

    Findingown data

    The 'negative reactions' theme captured anticipated and experienced responses from others and oneself in relation to the sense of difference and associated labelling, grouped into others' negative and judgemental reactions, social distancing, sense of stigma, shame and embarrassment; and personal feelings of shame and embarrassment, guilt, and fear that experiences would worry or upset others.

    “The third theme on 'negative reactions' captured anticipated and experienced responses both from others and oneselfin relation to the sense of difference and the associated labelling.These were grouped into six subthemes, reflecting others' (i) negative and judgemental reactions, (ii) social distancing, (iii) sense of stigma, shame and embarrassment; and also personal feelings of (iv) shame and”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingown data

    Overall there was close coherence between the qualitative and quantitative evidence, and quantitative findings fitted within the themes emerging from the qualitative synthesis.

    “Overall there was close coherence between the qualitative and quantitative evidence, and quantitative findings fitted within the themes emerging from the qualitative synthesis.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingown data

    The MMR studies were of relatively poorer methodological quality, with MMAT ratings of 0.0% and 37.5%.

    “The MMR studies were of relatively poorer methodological quality, with MMAT ratings of 0.0% and 37.5% (rating reflects the weakest of qualitative, quantitative and MMR-specific scores).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingown data

    The quality of the quantitative studies was mixed; MMAT ratings ranged from 37.5% to 100.0%, with 50.0% the modal rating (42.9%, 3/7).

    “The quality of the quantitative studies was mixed; MMAT ratings ranged from 37.5% to 100.0%, with 50.0% the modal rating (42.9%, 3/7).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingown data

    The most common limitations of the included qualitative studies were not providing information on people who declined participation, and not discussing how results related to the research context or researcher's influence.

    “The most common limitations were not providing information on people who declined participation, and not discussing how results related to the research context or researcher's influence.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Findingown data

    The 'service-related factors' theme described instances where deterring experiences of stigma were directly attributed to the service context, captured in feeling labelled, judged and treated differently by service providers; prejudiced attitudes towards and fear of mental health services; and belief that services break families apart.

    “The sixth theme, 'service-related factors', described instances where deterring experiences of stigma were directly attributed to the service context, captured in the subthemes (i) feeling labelled, judged and treated differently by service providers; (ii) prejudiced attitudes towards and (fear of) mental health services; and (iii) belief that services break families apart.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingown data

    The 'lack of knowledge and understanding' theme was reported in three studies only, but all considered FEP groups.

    “The 'lack of knowledge and understanding' theme was reported in three studies only, but all considered FEP groups.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingown data

    Stigma-related 'lack of knowledge and understanding' was only reported by three studies; none focused on affected persons' perspectives.

    “Stigma-related 'lack of knowledge and understanding' was only reported by three studies; none focused on affected persons' perspectives.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingown data

    The stigma-related experiences and beliefs described in the first four themes were reported to contribute to reluctance to recognize symptoms, delayed help-seeking due to withholding difficulties from informal sources of support, and influencing how people discussed, approached or engaged with services.

    “In terms of impact on pathways to care, the stigma-related experiences and beliefs described in these four themes were reported to contribute to, for example, reluctance to recognize symptoms, delayed help-seeking due to withholding difficulties from informal sources of support, and by influencing how people discussed, approached or engaged with services.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingown data

    Among at-risk groups, a 'sense of difference' that can instigate stigma processes was commonly reported in terms of 'not being normal, something is wrong' whereas FEP groups more often reported this in relation to a more specific sense of 'mental illness'.

    “For example, in terms of a 'sense of difference' that can instigate stigma processes, among at-risk groups this was commonly reported in terms of 'not being normal, something is wrong' whereas FEP groups more often reported this in relation to a more specific sense of 'mental illness'.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Classified as probably not a substantial claim.

    Findingown data

    The conceptual model is based on meta-synthesis of qualitative (n = 33) and quantitative (n = 9) results.

    “Conceptual model based on meta-synthesis of qualitative (n = 33) and quantitative (n = 9) results.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Classified as probably not a substantial claim.

    Premisecitation

    Qualitative and quantitative approaches provide insights reflecting different perspectives of a phenomena of interest.

    “These approaches consequently provide insights reflecting different perspectives of a phenomena of interest (Whitley, 2007;Hasson-Ohayon et al. 2015).”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 2 sources checked
    • cites Whitley, 2007

      Not checked in the free run.

    • cites Hasson-Ohayon et al. 2015

      Not checked in the free run.

  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable).

    Interpretationcitation

    Qualitative approaches might be better suited to capture nuanced context and person-dependent variability in relation to stigma.

    “Qualitative approaches might be better suited to capture nuanced contextand person-dependent variablity in relation to stigma (Link et al. 2004;Clement et al. 2015), which may explain why the majority of evidence identified for this review was qualitative.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 2 sources checked
    • cites Link et al. 2004

      Not checked in the free run.

    • cites Clement et al. 2015

      Not checked in the free run.

  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.

    Interpretationcitation

    Stigma might contribute to longer DUPs through leading to greater perceived barriers to help-seeking, which might delay contact with mental health services.

    “it was suggested that stigma might contribute to longer DUPs through leading to greater perceived barriers to help-seeking, which might delay contact with mental health services (Compton & Esterberg, 2005).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Compton & Esterberg, 2005

      Not checked in the free run.

  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Premisecitation

    Stigma can compromise prevention efforts through contributing to poor symptom recognition and knowledge about available treatments.

    “It has also been suggested that stigma can compromise prevention efforts through contributing to poor symptom recognition and knowledge about available treatments (Jorm et al. 2005;Rüsch & Thornicroft, 2014)”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 2 sources checked
    • cites Jorm et al. 2005

      Not checked in the free run.

    • cites Rüsch & Thornicroft, 2014

      Not checked in the free run.

  • Classified as probably not a substantial claim.

    Premisecitation

    Qualitative and quantitative research are underpinned by distinct epistemological paradigms: generally a positivist or post-positivist framework for quantitative research, and an interpretivist or constructivist tradition for qualitative research.

    “generally speaking, a positivist or post-positivist framework for quantitative research, and an interpretivist or constructivist tradition for qualitative research (Sale et al. 2002;Creswell, 2014)”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 2 sources checked
    • cites Sale et al. 2002

      Not checked in the free run.

    • cites Creswell, 2014

      Not checked in the free run.

  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.

    Study design and conductnone given

    Our search strategy might not have captured all articles relevant for this review, and our choice of databases could have limited the search.

    “Our search strategy might not have captured all articles relevant for this review, and our choice of databases could have limited the search.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.

    Study design and conductnone given

    Inclusion decisions and results synthesis were periodically discussed with another author (S.E-L.), and quotes from the included articles illustrating the themes are provided for transparency in online Supplement 5.

    “However, inclusion decisions and results synthesis were periodically discussed with another author (S.E-L.), and quotes from the included articles illustrating the themes are provided for transparency in online Supplement 5.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.

    Study design and conductreasoning

    We used a broad search strategy in multiple databases to avoid such issues.

    “However, we used a broad search strategy in multiple databases to avoid such issues.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable).

    Interpretationreasoning

    These comparisons advance the understanding of the role of stigma on early pathways to care in emerging psychosis.

    “These comparisons advance the understanding of the role of stigma on early pathways to care in emerging psychosis.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.

    Study design and conductnone given

    The funders had no role in study design, data collection and analysis and interpretation, writing of the manuscript or decision to submit it for publication.

    “The funders had no role in study design, data collection and analysis and interpretation, writing of the manuscript or decision to submit it for publication.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.

    Study design and conductnone given

    The qualitative data synthesis was primarily conducted by the main author (P.C.G.), which could have biased the process.

    “The qualitative data synthesis was primarily conducted by the main author (P.C.G.), which could have biased the process.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Study design and conductnone given

    The included studies were primarily conducted in high-income and Western countries, restricting the generalizability of the findings.

    “Also, the included studies were primarily conducted in high-income and Western countries, restricting the generalizability of the findings.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Study design and conductreasoning

    Quantitative results could be synthesized using only a narrative approach; statistical pooling was prevented by the studies' methodological and conceptual heterogeneity.

    “Quantitative results could be synthesized using only a narrative approach; statistical pooling was prevented by the studies' methodological and conceptual heterogeneity.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Interpretationcitation

    The findings of this review should be interpreted in view of how other, non-stigma-related influences are also likely to constitute barriers on pathways to care.

    “Additionally, the findings of this review should be interpreted in view of how other, non-stigma-related influences are also likely to constitute barriers on pathways to care (Dockery et al. 2015).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Dockery et al. 2015

      Not checked in the free run.

  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Premisecitation

    Stigma-related influences can be stronger for people from certain cultural or ethnic backgrounds, due to culturally-linked beliefs and morals influencing interpretations of mental illness.

    “Stigma-related influences can be stronger for people from certain cultural or ethnic backgrounds, due to culturally-linked beliefs and morals influencing interpretations of mental illness (Yang et al. 2007).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Yang et al. 2007

      Not checked in the free run.

  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    Non-stigma-related barriers to care can include structural/situational factors, financial reasons, low perceived service need, perceived ineffectiveness of services, or a preference to cope with a problem on their own.

    “These barriers can include, for example, structural/situational factors (e.g.issues with service location, timing or availability), financial reasons (e.g.cost of services, health insurance cover), low perceived service need, perceived ineffectiveness of services, or a preference to cope with a problem on their own (Kessler et al. 2001;Andrade et al. 2014).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 2 sources checked
    • cites Kessler et al. 2001

      Not checked in the free run.

    • cites Andrade et al. 2014

      Not checked in the free run.

  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.

    Study design and conductreasoning

    Relevant work might also have been excluded through our inclusion only of published, peer-reviewed papers; restrictions necessary to achieve a feasible volume of results to screen.

    “Relevant work might also have been excluded through our inclusion only of published, peer-reviewed papers; restrictions necessary to achieve a feasible volume of results to screen.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
31 of 31

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 3

  1. 2009, Systematic Reviews: CRD's Guidance for Undertaking Reviews in Health Care
  2. Pope, 2007, Synthesising Qualitative and Quantitative Health Evidence: A Guide to Methods
  3. 2010, EPPI-Centre Methods for Conducting Systematic Reviews

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Gronholm, P. C., Thornicroft, G., Laurens, K. R., & Evans-Lacko, S.
Affiliations
King's College London (GB)
Corresponding author
Gronholm, P. C.
Venue
Psychological Medicine
Published
2017-02-15
Volume
47
Issue
11
Pages
1867-1879
ISSN
  • 0033-2917 (ISSN-L)
  • 1469-8978
OpenAlex
W2589011515
Cited by
181
References
53
Citations by year
2026: 9 · 2025: 26 · 2024: 29 · 2023: 16 · 2022: 23 · 2021: 18 · 2020: 14 · 2019: 15 · 2018: 21 · 2017: 10
FWCI
2.53
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Psychological Medicine (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • London School of Economics and Political Science Research Online (London School of Economics and Political Science) (acceptedVersion)
  • QUT ePrints (Queensland University of Technology) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
  • UNSWorks (University of New South Wales, Sydney, Australia) (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • Research Portal (King's College London) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
Funders
  • South London and Maudsley NHS Foundation Trust
  • King's College Hospital NHS Foundation Trust
  • National Institute for Health and Care Research (RP-PG-0606-1053, FP7/2007–2013, NF-SI-0611-10053)
  • King's College London
  • European Commission (2007–2013, FP7 2007-2013, FP7/2007)
  • Programme Grants for Applied Research
  • FP7 Ideas: European Research Council (337673)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Mental Health Treatment and Access
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Schizophrenia research and treatment
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Psychology and Mental Health
Keywords
mental health stigma, pathways to care, first-episode psychosis, help-seeking, help-seeking barriers, early intervention, service contact, help-seeking delay
MeSH terms
Humans, Patient Acceptance of Health Care, Psychotic Disorders, Social Stigma

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Claims read by deepseek-v4.1-flash under definition version 3 (extract-v3) on 2026-10-07.

Classified by jev-1.13-20260917 (gold-guideline-v0.2) on 2026-10-07.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review