Cited by 34Cancer survivorship and careReconstructive Facial Surgery TechniquesBody Image and Dysmorphia Studies

Salient body image concerns of patients with cancer undergoing head and neck reconstruction

Teo, Irene, Fronczyk, Kassandra M., Guindani, Michele, Vannucci, Marina, Ulfers, Sara S., Hanasono, Matthew M., Fingeret, Michelle Cororve·2016·Head & Neck

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Patients with cancer undergoing head and neck reconstruction can experience significant distress from alterations in appearance and bodily functioning. We sought to delineate salient dimensions of body image concerns in this patient population preparing for reconstructive surgery. METHODS: Participants completed self-report questionnaires evaluating numerous aspects of body image. We used Bayesian factor analysis modeling methods to identify latent factors emerging from the data. RESULTS: We identified 2 latent factors: appearance distress and functional difficulties. The highest level of preoperative body image concerns were related to distress about appearance changes and its perceived social consequences. Appearance distress items displayed greater variability compared with functional difficulties. CONCLUSION: Appearance and functional changes to body image are important areas of concern for patients with head and neck cancer as they prepare for reconstructive surgery. Knowledge regarding specific body image issues can be used to guide psychosocial assessments and intervention to enhance patient care. © 2016 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. Head Neck 38: 1035-1042, 2016.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1002/hed.24415

Cites

38 of 38 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Teo, I., Fronczyk, K. M., Guindani, M., Vannucci, M., Ulfers, S. S., Hanasono, M. M., & Fingeret, M. C.
Affiliations
  • The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center (US)
  • Rice University (US)
  • Washington University in St. Louis (US)
Corresponding author
Fingeret, Michelle Cororve
Venue
Head & Neck
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2016-03-11
Volume
38
Issue
7
Pages
1035-1042
ISSN
1043-3074 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2295707681
Cited by
34
References
38
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 6 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 5 · 2021: 3 · 2020: 2 · 2019: 7 · 2018: 2 · 2016: 1
FWCI
1.80
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Head & Neck (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
National Cancer Institute (P30CA016672)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Oncology › Cancer survivorship and care
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Surgery › Reconstructive Facial Surgery Techniques
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Body Image and Dysmorphia Studies
Keywords
body image concern, head and neck cancer, head and neck reconstruction, functional difficulties, psychosocial assessment, Bayesian factor analysis
MeSH terms
Adaptation, Physiological, Adaptation, Psychological, Aged, Aged, 80 and over, Bayes Theorem, Body Image, Female, Head and Neck Neoplasms, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Quality of Life, Surveys and Questionnaires, Texas, Cohort Studies, Treatment Outcome, Survivors, Plastic Surgery Procedures, Neck Dissection, Self Report

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review