Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 714

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Liver stiffness measurement predicts severe portal hypertension in patients with HCV‐related cirrhosis†‡

Open access
Vizzutti, Francesco, Arena, Umberto, Romanelli, Roberto G., Rega, Luigi, Foschi, Marco, Colagrande, Stefano, Petrarca, Antonio, Moscarella, Stefania, Belli, Giacomo, Zignego, Anna Linda, Marra, Fabio, Laffi, Giacomo, Pinzani, Massimo·2007·Hepatology

Abstract

UNLABELLED: Measurement of hepatic venous pressure gradient (HVPG) is a standard method for the assessment of portal pressure and correlates with the occurrence of its complications. Liver stiffness measurement (LSM) has been proposed as a noninvasive technique for the prediction of the complications of cirrhosis. In this study, we evaluated the ability of LSM to predict severe portal hypertension compared with that of HVPG in 61 consecutive patients with HCV-related chronic liver disease. A strong relationship between LSM and HVPG measurements was found in the overall population (r=0.81, P<0.0001). However, although the correlation was excellent for HVPG values less than 10 or 12 mm Hg (r=0.81, P=0.0003 and r=0.91, P<0.0001, respectively), linear regression analysis was not optimal for HVPG values>or=10 mm Hg (r2=0.35, P<0.0001) or>or=12 mm Hg (r2=0.17, P=0.02). The AUROC for the prediction of HVPG>or=10 and >or=12 mm Hg were 0.99 and 0.92, respectively and at LSM cutoff values of 13.6 kPa and 17.6 kPa, sensitivity was 97% and 94%, respectively. In patients with cirrhosis, LSM positively correlated with the presence of esophageal varices (P=0.002), although no correlation between LSM and esophageal varices size was detected. The area under the ROC for the prediction of EV was 0.76 and at a LSM cutoff value of 17.6 kPa sensitivity was 90%. CONCLUSION: LSM represents a non-invasive tool for the identification of chronic liver disease patients with clinically significant or severe portal hypertension and could be employed for screening patients to be subjected to standard investigations including upper GI endoscopy and hemodynamic studies.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1002/hep.21665

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

No references could be resolved yet.

Research works printed but not linked: 24

  1. Burroughs, 2005, Assessment of therapeutic benefit of antiviral therapy in chronic hepatitis C: is hepatic venous pressure gradient a better end point?, Gut, 50, 425, 10.1136/gut.50.3.425 · DOI
  2. Sandrin, 2002, Shear elasticity probe for soft tissues with 1‐D transient elastography, IEEE Trans Ultrason Ferroelectr Freq Control, 49, 436, 10.1109/58.996561 · DOI · Paper page
  3. Ziol, 2004, Non‐invasive assessment of liver fibrosis by measurement of stiffness in patients with chronic hepatitis C, HEPATOLOGY, 41, 48, 10.1002/hep.20506 · DOI · Paper page
  4. Castera, 2005, Prospective comparison of transient elastography. Fibrotest, APRI and liver biopsy for the assessment of liver fibrosis in chronic hepatitis C, Gastroenterology, 128, 343, 10.1053/j.gastro.2004.11.018 · DOI · Paper page
  5. Foucher, 2006, Diagnosis of cirrhosis by transient elastography (Fibroscan): a prospective study, Gut, 55, 403, 10.1136/gut.2005.069153 · DOI · Paper page
  6. Kazemi, 2006, Liver stiffness measurements selects patients with cirrhosis at risk of bearing large esophageal varices, J Hepatol, 45, 230, 10.1016/j.jhep.2006.04.006 · DOI · Paper page
  7. Carrion, 2006, Transient elastography for diagnosis of advanced fibrosis and portal hypertension in patients with hepatitis C recurrence after liver transplantation, Liver Transpl, 12, 1791, 10.1002/lt.20857 · DOI · Paper page
  8. 1994, The French METAVIR Cooperative Study Group ., HEPATOLOGY, 20, 15
  9. Bosch, 1989, Portal hypertension, Med Clin North Am, 73, 931, 10.1016/S0025-7125(16)30646-0 · DOI
  10. Groszmann, 2004, The hepatic venous pressure gradient: anything worth doing should be done right, HEPATOLOGY, 39, 280, 10.1002/hep.20062 · DOI · Paper page
  11. de Franchis, 2000, Updating consensus in portal hypertension: report of the Baveno III Consensus Workshop of Definitions, Methodology and Therapeutic Strategies in Portal Hypertension, J Hepatol, 33, 846, 10.1016/S0168-8278(00)80320-7 · DOI · Paper page
  12. McNeil, 1975, Primer on certain elements of medical decision making, N Engl J Med, 293, 211, 10.1056/NEJM197507312930501 · DOI · Paper page
  13. Garcia‐Tsao, 1985, Portal pressure, presence of gastro‐esophageal varices and variceal bleeding, HEPATOLOGY, 28, 868
  14. Groszmann, 1990, Hemodynamic events in a prospective randomized trial of propranolol versus placebo in the prevention of a first variceal haemorrhage, Gastroenterology, 99, 1401, 10.1016/0016-5085(90)91168-6 · DOI · Paper page
  15. Viallet, 1975, Hemodynamic evaluation of patients with intrahepatic portal hypertension: relationship between bleeding varices and the portohepatic gradient, Gastroenterology, 69, 1297
  16. Casado, 1998, Clinical events after transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt: correlation with hemodynamic findings, Gastroenterology, 114, 1296, 10.1016/S0016-5085(98)70436-6 · DOI · Paper page
  17. Vorobioff, 1996, Prognostic value of hepatic venous pressure gradient measurements in alcoholic cirrhosis: a 10‐year prospective study, Gastroenterology, 111, 701, 10.1053/gast.1996.v111.pm8780575 · DOI · Paper page
  18. Pinzani, 1999, Biology of hepatic stellate cells and their possible relevance in the pathogenesis of portal hypertension in cirrhosis, Semin Liver Dis, 19, 397, 10.1055/s-2007-1007128 · DOI
  19. Wiest, 2002, The paradox of nitric oxide in cirrhosis and portal hypertension: too much, not enough, HEPATOLOGY, 35, 478, 10.1053/jhep.2002.31432 · DOI · Paper page
  20. Gupta, 1998, Endothelial dysfunction and decreased production of nitric oxide in the intrahepatic microcirculation of cirrhotic rats, HEPATOLOGY, 28, 926, 10.1002/hep.510280405 · DOI · Paper page
  21. Ripoll, 2006, Hepatic venous pressure gradient (HVPG) predicts clinical decompensation (CD) in patients (PTS) with compensated cirrhosis, HEPATOLOGY, 44, 203A
  22. Lemoine, 2006, Liver stiffness measurement is correlated with hepatic venous pressure gradient in patients with uncomplicated alcoholic and/or HVC related‐cirrhosis, HEPATOLOGY, 44, 204A
  23. Bosch, 2006, Predictions from a hard liver, J Hepatol, 45, 174, 10.1016/j.jhep.2006.06.002 · doi:10.1016/j.jhep.2006.06.002
  24. de Franchis, 2005, Evolving consensus in portal hypertension: report of the Baveno IV Consensus Workshop on methodology of diagnosis and therapy in portal hypertension, J Hepatol, 43, 167, 10.1016/j.jhep.2005.05.009 · DOI · Paper page

Cited by

See all 714

Metadata

Authors
Vizzutti, F., Arena, U., Romanelli, R. G., Rega, L., Foschi, M., Colagrande, S., Petrarca, A., Moscarella, S., Belli, G., Zignego, A. L., Marra, F., Laffi, G., & Pinzani, M.
Venue
Hepatology
Published
2007-05
Volume
45
Issue
5
Pages
1290-1297
ISSN
0270-9139 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W1972702648
Cited by
714
References
0
FWCI
26.54
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
bronze
Licence
doi.wiley.com/10.1002/tdm_license_1.1 (tdm, 3045 d)

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Liver stiffness measurement predicts severe portal hypertension in patients with HCV‐related cirrhosis†‡. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1002/hep.21665
The paper
Vizzutti, F., Arena, U., Romanelli, R. G., Rega, L., Foschi, M., Colagrande, S., Petrarca, A., Moscarella, S., Belli, G., Zignego, A. L., Marra, F., Laffi, G., & Pinzani, M. (2007). Liver stiffness measurement predicts severe portal hypertension in patients with HCV‐related cirrhosis†‡. Hepatology. https://doi.org/10.1002/hep.21665

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.