Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 164

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Reliability of the Roussel Uclaf Causality Assessment Method for assessing causality in drug‐induced liver injury†‡

Rochon, James, Protiva, Petr, Seeff, Leonard B., Fontana, Robert J., Liangpunsakul, Suthat, Watkins, Paul B., Davern, Timothy, McHutchison, John G.·2008·Hepatology

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1002/hep.22442

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 1 references

Research works printed but not linked: 31

  1. Watkins, 2006, Drug‐induced liver injury: summary of a single topic clinical research conference, HEPATOLOGY, 43, 618, 10.1002/hep.21095 · DOI · Paper page
  2. Navarro, 2006, Current concepts: drug‐related hepatotoxicity, N Engl J Med, 354, 731, 10.1056/NEJMra052270 · DOI · Paper page
  3. Abboud, 2007, Drug‐induced liver injury, Drug Saf, 30, 277, 10.2165/00002018-200730040-00001 · DOI
  4. Lee, 2005, Recognizing drug‐induced liver injury: current problems and possible solutions, Toxicol Pathol, 33, 155, 10.1080/01926230590522356 · DOI
  5. Kaplowitz, 2001, Causality assessment versus guilt‐by‐association in drug hepatotoxicity, HEPATOLOGY, 33, 308, 10.1053/jhep.2001.21083 · DOI
  6. Danan, 1993, Causality assessment of adverse reactions to drugs. I. A novel method based on the conclusions of international consensus meetings: application to drug‐induced liver injuries, J Clin Epidemiol, 46, 1323, 10.1016/0895-4356(93)90101-6 · DOI · Paper page
  7. Benichou, 1993, Causality assessment of adverse reactions to drugs. II. An original model for validation of drug causality assessment methods: case reports with positive rechallenge, J Clin Epidemiol, 46, 1331, 10.1016/0895-4356(93)90102-7 · DOI · Paper page
  8. Maria, 1997, Development and validation of a clinical scale for the diagnosis of drug‐induced hepatitis, HEPATOLOGY, 26, 664, 10.1002/hep.510260319 · DOI · Paper page
  9. Lucena, 2001, Comparison of two clinical scales for causality assessment in hepatotoxicity, HEPATOLOGY, 33, 123, 10.1053/jhep.2001.20645 · DOI · Paper page
  10. Stojanovski, 2007, Atomoxetine‐induced hepatitis in a child, Clin Toxicol, 45, 51, 10.1080/15563650600795644 · DOI
  11. Yan, 2006, Rofecoxib‐induced hepatotoxicity: a forgotten complication of the coxibs, Can J Gastroenterol, 20, 351, 10.1155/2006/356434 · DOI
  12. Fontana, 2005, Acute liver failure due to amoxicillin and amoxicillin/clavulanate, Dig Dis Sci, 50, 1785, 10.1007/s10620-005-2938-5 · DOI
  13. Cárdenas, 2006, Acute hepatitis due to Shen‐Min: a herbal product derived from Polygonum multiflorum, J Clin Gastroenterol, 40, 629, 10.1097/00004836-200608000-00014 · DOI
  14. Lynch, 2006, Fulminant hepatic failure associated with the use of black cohosh: a case report, Liver Transpl, 12, 989, 10.1002/lt.20778 · DOI
  15. Björnsson, 2007, Long‐term follow‐up of patients with mild to moderate drug‐induced liver injury, Aliment Pharmacol Ther, 26, 79, 10.1111/j.1365-2036.2007.03355.x · DOI
  16. Andrade, 2006, Outcome of acute idiosyncratic drug‐induced liver injury: long‐term follow‐up in a hepatotoxicity registry, HEPATOLOGY, 44, 1581, 10.1002/hep.21424 · DOI · Paper page
  17. Masumoto, 2003, Diagnosis of drug‐induced liver injury in Japanese patients by criteria of Consensus Meetings in Europe, Hepatol Res, 25, 1, 10.1016/S1386-6346(02)00148-1 · DOI
  18. Lee, 2005, Hepatic findings in long‐term clinical trials of ximelagatran, Drug Saf, 28, 351, 10.2165/00002018-200528040-00006 · DOI
  19. Andrade, 2004, HLA class II genotype influences the type of liver injury in drug‐induced idiosyncratic liver disease, HEPATOLOGY, 39, 1603, 10.1002/hep.20215 · DOI
  20. Hoofnagle, 2004, Drug‐Induced Liver Network (DILIN), HEPATOLOGY, 40, 773, 10.1002/hep.20445 · DOI
  21. Eliasziw, 1994, Statistical methodology for the concurrent assessment of interrater and intrarater reliability: using goniometric measurements as an example, Phys Ther, 74, 777, 10.1093/ptj/74.8.777 · DOI
  22. Carpenter, 2000, Bootstrap confidence intervals: when, which, what? A practical guide for medical statisticians, Stat Med, 19, 1141, 10.1002/(SICI)1097-0258(20000515)19:9<1141::AID-SIM479>3.0.CO;2-F · DOI
  23. Walsh, 1990, Bootstrapping: a tool for clinical research, J Clin Psychol, 46, 928, 10.1002/1097-4679(199011)46:6<928::AID-JCLP2270460638>3.0.CO;2-7 · DOI
  24. Donner, 1987, Sample size requirements for reliability studies, Stat Med, 6, 441, 10.1002/sim.4780060404 · DOI · Paper page
  25. Salaffi, 2005, Measuring functional disability in early rheumatoid arthritis: the validity, reliability and responsiveness of the Recent‐Onset Arthritis Disability (ROAD) index, Clin Exp Rheumatol, 23, S31
  26. Migliore Norweg, 2006, A new functional status outcome measure of dyspnea and anxiety for adults with lung disease: the dyspnea management questionnaire, J Cardiopulm Rehabil, 26, 395, 10.1097/00008483-200611000-00010 · DOI
  27. Cheung, 2000, The UK IBDQ—a British version of the inflammatory bowel disease questionnaire: development and validation, J Clin Epidemiol, 53, 297, 10.1016/S0895-4356(99)00152-3 · DOI
  28. Turner, 2007, Development, validation, and evaluation of a pediatric ulcerative colitis activity index: a prospective multicenter study, Gastroenterology, 133, 423, 10.1053/j.gastro.2007.05.029 · DOI · Paper page
  29. Huber, 2004, Validation and clinical significance of the Childhood Myositis Assessment Scale for assessment of muscle function in the juvenile idiopathic inflammatory myopathies, Arthritis Rheum, 50, 1595, 10.1002/art.20179 · DOI
  30. Isenberg, 2004, International consensus outcome measures for patients with idiopathic inflammatory myopathies. Development and initial validation of myositis activity and damage indices in patients with adult onset disease, Rheumatology, 43, 49, 10.1093/rheumatology/keg427 · DOI · Paper page
  31. Lachin, 2004, The role of measurement reliability in clinical trials, Clin Trials, 1, 553, 10.1191/1740774504cn057oa · DOI

Cited by

See all 164

Metadata

Authors
Rochon, J., Protiva, P., Seeff, L. B., Fontana, R. J., Liangpunsakul, S., Watkins, P. B., Davern, T., & McHutchison, J. G.
Venue
Hepatology
Published
2008-10
Volume
48
Issue
4
Pages
1175-1183
ISSN
0270-9139
Cited by
164
References
1
Language
en
Licence
doi.wiley.com/10.1002/tdm_license_1.1 (tdm, 2526 d)

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Reliability of the Roussel Uclaf Causality Assessment Method for assessing causality in drug‐induced liver injury†‡. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1002/hep.22442
The paper
Rochon, J., Protiva, P., Seeff, L. B., Fontana, R. J., Liangpunsakul, S., Watkins, P. B., Davern, T., & McHutchison, J. G. (2008). Reliability of the Roussel Uclaf Causality Assessment Method for assessing causality in drug‐induced liver injury†‡. Hepatology. https://doi.org/10.1002/hep.22442

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.