Cited by 55Liver Disease and TransplantationSepsis Diagnosis and TreatmentAntifungal resistance and susceptibility

Impact of Rifaximin on the Frequency and Characteristics of Spontaneous Bacterial Peritonitis in Patients with Liver Cirrhosis and Ascites

Open access
Lutz, Philipp, Parcina, Marijo, Bekeredjian-Ding, Isabelle, Nischalke, Hans Dieter, Nattermann, Jacob, Sauerbruch, Tilman, Hoerauf, Achim, Strassburg, Christian P. +1 more·2014·PLoS ONE

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Rifaximin is a non-absorbable antibiotic used to prevent relapses of hepatic encephalopathy which may also be a candidate for prophylaxis of spontaneous bacterial peritonitis (SBP). AIM: To detect the impact of rifaximin on the occurrence and characteristics of SBP. METHODS: We prospectively studied all hospitalized patients that underwent a diagnostic paracentesis in our department from March 2012 to April 2013 for SBP and recorded all clinical data including type of SBP prophylaxis, prior use of rifaximin, concomitant complications of cirrhosis, as well as laboratory results and bacteriological findings. Patients were divided into the following three groups: no antibiotic prophylaxis, prophylaxis with rifaximin or with systemically absorbed antibiotic prophylaxis. RESULTS: Our study cohort comprised 152 patients with advanced liver cirrhosis, 32 of whom developed SBP during the study period. As expected, our study groups differed regarding a history of hepatic encephalopathy and SBP before inclusion into the study. None of the 17 patients on systemic antibiotic prophylaxis developed SBP while 8/27 patients on rifaximin and 24/108 without prophylaxis had SBP (p = 0.02 and p = 0.04 versus systemic antibiotics, respectively). In general, episodes of SBP were similar for patients treated with rifaximin and those without any prophylaxis. However, Escherichia coli and enterococci were dominant in the ascites of patients without any prophylaxis, while mostly klebsiella species were recovered from the ascites samples in the rifaximin group. CONCLUSION: Rifaximin pretreatment did not lead to a reduction of SBP occurrence in hospitalized patients with advanced liver disease. However, the bacterial species causing SBP were changed by rifaximin.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1371/journal.pone.0093909

Cites

39 of 39 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. [24]Gillis JC, Brogden RN (1995) Rifaximin. A review of its antibacterial activity, pharmacokinetic properties and therapeutical potential in conditions mediated by gastrointestinal bacteria. Drugs 49: 467– 484. 7774516

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Lutz, P., Parcina, M., Bekeredjian-Ding, I., Nischalke, H. D., Nattermann, J., Sauerbruch, T., Hoerauf, A., Strassburg, C. P., & Spengler, U.
Affiliations
University of Bonn (DE)
Corresponding author
Lutz, Philipp
Venue
PLoS ONE
Published
2014-04-08
Volume
9
Issue
4
Pages
e93909
ISSN
1932-6203 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2053677150
Cited by
55
References
39
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 6 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 6 · 2020: 1 · 2018: 9 · 2017: 11 · 2016: 7 · 2015: 9
FWCI
5.04
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • PLoS ONE (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion, other-oa)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
  • University of Birmingham Research Portal (University of Birmingham) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
Funders
Deutsches Zentrum für Infektionsforschung
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Hepatology › Liver Disease and Transplantation
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Epidemiology › Sepsis Diagnosis and Treatment
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Infectious Diseases › Antifungal resistance and susceptibility
Keywords
rifaximin, spontaneous bacterial peritonitis, liver cirrhosis, ascites, antibiotic prophylaxis, systemic antibiotic prophylaxis, Escherichia coli, Klebsiella, Enterococcus, bacterial species composition, hepatic encephalopathy
MeSH terms
Rifaximin, Adult, Aged, Aged, 80 and over, Anti-Infective Agents, Ascites, Bacterial Infections, Escherichia coli, Female, Humans, Klebsiella, Liver Cirrhosis, Male, Middle Aged, Peritonitis, Prospective Studies, Rifamycins, Treatment Outcome, Enterococcus, Antibiotic Prophylaxis

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review