The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Clinical presentations and outcomes of bile duct loss caused by drugs and herbal and dietary supplements
Abstract
Bile duct loss during the course of drug‐induced liver injury is uncommon, but can be an indication of vanishing bile duct syndrome (VBDS). In this work, we assess the frequency, causes, clinical features, and outcomes of cases of drug‐induced liver injury with histologically proven bile duct loss. All cases of drug‐induced liver injury enrolled into a prospective database over a 10‐year period that had undergone liver biopsies (n = 363) were scored for the presence of bile duct loss and assessed for clinical and laboratory features, causes, and outcomes. Twenty‐six of the 363 patients (7%) with drug‐, herbal‐, or dietary‐supplement–associated liver injury had bile duct loss on liver biopsy, which was moderate to severe (<50% of portal areas with bile ducts) in 14 and mild (50%‐75%) in 12. The presenting clinical features of the 26 cases varied, but the most common clinical pattern was a severe cholestatic hepatitis. The implicated agents included amoxicillin/clavulanate (n = 3), temozolomide (n = 3), various herbal products (n = 3), azithromycin (n = 2), and 15 other medications or dietary supplements. Compared to those without, those with bile duct loss were more likely to develop chronic liver injury (94% vs. 47%), which was usually cholestatic and sometimes severe. Five patients died and 2 others underwent liver transplantation for progressive cholestasis despite treatment with corticosteroids and ursodiol. The most predictive factor of poor outcome was the degree of bile duct loss on liver biopsy. Conclusion: Bile duct loss during acute cholestatic hepatitis is an ominous early indicator of possible VBDS, for which at present there are no known means of prevention or therapy. (H epatology 2017;65:1267‐1277)
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Prolonged cholestasis with progressive reduction of the interlobular bile ducts can lead to vanishing bile duct syndrome with a poor prognosis.
“Prolonged cholestasis with progressive reduction of the interlobular bile ducts can lead to vanishing bile duct syndrome with a poor prognosis [74].”
From Chinese guideline for the diagnosis and treatment of drug-induced liver injury: an update (2024) · cites this paper as [74]
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
No references could be resolved yet.
Research works printed but not linked: 22
- 1998, Histopathology of chronic cholestasis and adult ductopenic syndrome, Clin Liver Dis, 2, 249, 10.1016/S1089-3261(05)70006-4 · DOI
- 1992, Drug‐induced prolonged cholestasis in adults: a histological semiquantitative study demonstrating progressive ductopenia, Hepatology, 15, 244, 10.1002/hep.1840150212 · DOI
- 1992, Carbamazepine hepatotoxicity: another cause of the vanishing bile duct syndrome, Gastroenterology, 102, 1385, 10.1016/0016-5085(92)90780-3 · DOI
- 1994, Antibiotic‐associated acute vanishing bile duct syndrome: a pattern associated with severe, prolonged, intrahepatic cholestasis, J Hepatol, 20, 112, 10.1016/S0168-8278(05)80476-3 · DOI
- 1999, Prolonged cholestasis with ductopenia after administration of amoxicillin/clavulanic acid, Dig Dis Sci, 44, 1997, 10.1023/A:1026610015899 · DOI
- 2005, Vanishing bile duct syndrome: amoxicillin‐clavulanic acid associated intra‐hepatic cholestasis responsive to ursodeoxycholic acid, J Pediatr Gastroenterol Nutr, 41, 469, 10.1097/01.mpg.0000178086.44155.73 · DOI
- 2006, Restoration of bile ducts in drug‐induced vanishing bile duct syndrome due to zonisamide, Am J Surg Pathol, 30, 1619, 10.1097/01.pas.0000213342.78475.48 · DOI
- 2010, Vanishing bile duct syndrome associated with azithromycin in a 62‐year‐old man, Basic Clin Pharmacol Toxicol, 106, 62, 10.1111/j.1742-7843.2009.00474.x · DOI
- 2010, Moxifloxacin associated vanishing bile duct syndrome, J Clin Gastroenterol, 44, 72, 10.1097/MCG.0b013e3181a51af9 · DOI
- 2012, Lamotrigine induced vanishing bile duct syndrome in a child, J Pediatr Gastroenterol Nutr, 55, e147
- 2008, Vanishing bile duct syndrome, Clin Liver Dis, 12, 203, 10.1016/j.cld.2007.11.007 · DOI
- 2009, Drug‐Induced Liver Injury Network (DILIN) prospective study: rationale, design and conduct, [Paper # 03 from the US Drug Induced Liver Injury Network] Drug Saf, 32, 55
- 2015, Features and outcomes of 899 patients with drug‐induced liver injury: the DILIN Prospective Study, [Paper # 36 from the US Drug Induced Liver Injury Network] Gastroenterology, 148, 1340
- 2010, Causality assessment in drug‐induced liver injury using a structured expert opinion process: comparison to the Roussel‐Uclaf causality assessment method, Hepatology, 51, 2117, 10.1002/hep.23577 · DOI · Paper page
- 2014, Hepatic histological findings in suspected drug‐induced liver injury: systematic evaluation and clinical associations, Hepatology, 59, 661, 10.1002/hep.26709 · DOI
- Death and liver transplantation within two years of onset of drug‐induced liver injury, Hepatology
- 2016, Amoxicillin‐clavulanate‐induced liver injury, [Paper # 40 from the US Drug‐Induced Liver Injury Network] Dig Dis Sci, 61, 2406
- 2015, Azithromycin‐induced cholestatic hepatitis, Conn Med, 79, 213
- 2011, Clinical and histopathological features of fluoroquinolone‐induced liver injury, [Paper # 10 from the US Drug Induced Liver Injury Network] Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol, 9, 517
- 2013, Clinical and histological features of idiosyncratic acute liver injury caused by temozolomide, [Paper # 18 from the US Drug Induced Liver Injury Network] Dig Dis Sci, 58, 1415
- 2012, Severe sustained cholestatic hepatitis following temozolomide in a patient with glioblastoma multiforme: case study and review of data from the FDA adverse events reporting system, Neuro Oncol, 14, 541, 10.1093/neuonc/nos056 · DOI
- Vanishing bile duct syndrome in the context of concurrent temozolomide for glioblastoma, BMJ Case Rep
Cited by
Sorted by citations
EASL Clinical Practice Guidelines: Drug-induced liver injury
Andrade, R. J., Aithal, G. P., Björnsson, E. S., Kaplowitz, N., Kullak-Ublick, G. A., Larrey, D., & Karlsen, T. H. (2019) · Journal of Hepatology · doi:10.1016/j.jhep.2019.02.014 · Cited by 1,276
Andrade, R. J., Chalasani, N., Björnsson, E. S., Suzuki, A., Kullak-Ublick, G. A., Watkins, P. B., Devarbhavi, H., Merz, M., Lucena, M. I., Kaplowitz, N., et al. (2019) · Nature Reviews Disease Primers · doi:10.1038/s41572-019-0105-0 · Cited by 924
ACG Clinical Guideline: the diagnosis and management of idiosyncratic drug-induced liver injury
Chalasani, N. P., Hayashi, P. H., Bonkovsky, H. L., Navarro, V. J., Lee, W. M., & Fontana, R. J. (2014) · American Journal of Gastroenterology · doi:10.1038/ajg.2014.131 · Cited by 860
Self-citationDrug-induced liver injury—types and phenotypes
Hoofnagle, J. H., & Björnsson, E. S. (2019) · New England Journal of Medicine · doi:10.1056/nejmra1816149 · Cited by 652
Self-citationACG Clinical Guideline: Diagnosis and Management of Idiosyncratic Drug-Induced Liver Injury
Chalasani, N. P., Maddur, H., Russo, M. W., Wong, R. J., Reddy, K. R., & on behalf of the Practice Parameters Committee of the American College of Gastroenterology (2021) · American Journal of Gastroenterology · doi:10.14309/ajg.0000000000001259 · Cited by 430
Self-citationAASLD practice guidance on drug, herbal, and dietary supplement–induced liver injury
Fontana, R. J., Liou, I., Reuben, A., Suzuki, A., Fiel, M. I., Lee, W., & Navarro, V. (2023) · Hepatology · doi:10.1002/hep.32689 · Cited by 340
Self-citationSundaram, V., & Björnsson, E. S. (2017) · Hepatology Communications · doi:10.1002/hep4.1088 · Cited by 138
Chinese guideline for the diagnosis and treatment of drug-induced liver injury: an update
Mao, Y., Ma, S., Liu, C., Liu, X., Su, M., Li, D., Li, Y., Chen, G., Chen, J., Chen, J., et al. (2024) · Hepatology International · doi:10.1007/s12072-023-10633-7 · Cited by 62
Validation of the revised electronic version of RUCAM for diagnosis of DILI in Chinese patients
Zhao, X., Wang, Y., Lai, R., Wang, X., Yu, Y., Li, M., Zhao, H., Ma, Z., Li, M., Guo, T., et al. (2024) · Hepatology Communications · doi:10.1097/hc9.0000000000000235 · Cited by 12
Drug-induced liver injury: Diagnosis, management and the role of liver transplantation
Ozturk, N. B., Uskudar, E., Toruner, M. D., Simsek, C., & Gurakar, A. (2025) · Hepatology Forum · doi:10.14744/hf.2024.2024.0003 · Cited by 9
The contemporary epidemiology, causes, and management of drug-induced liver injury
Swanson, L., & Fontana, R. J. (2026) · Hepatology Communications · doi:10.1097/hc9.0000000000001011
Self-citation
Metadata
- Authors
- Bonkovsky, H. L., Kleiner, D. E., Gu, J., Odin, J. A., Russo, M. W., Navarro, V. M., Fontana, R. J., Ghabril, M. S., Barnhart, H., Hoofnagle, J. H., & for the U.S. Drug Induced Liver Injury Network Investigators
- Venue
- Hepatology
- Published
- 2017-02-07
- Volume
- 65
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 1267-1277
- ISSN
- 0270-9139
- 1527-3350
- PMC
- PMC5360519
- Cited by
- 137
- References
- 0
- Language
- en
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review