The DOI matches its Crossref record; 5 of the 5 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Mental models, team mental models, and performance: Process, development, and future directions
Open accessAbstract
Since the 1940s, researchers have grappled with the notion of a mental model . The concept is eminently reasonable and somewhat seductive, but presents us with a number of difficulties regarding its incompleteness, multiplicity, and inconsistency. Not the least of these difficulties is the problem of “capturing” (measuring) mental models, and still more difficult, capturing a team mental model , an extension of the earlier term. Once captured, finding an appropriate analytic procedure to analyze team mental models has challenged researchers for a long time. Nonetheless, the literature suggests that the construct is well worth the trouble, with many applied benefits especially to industry. In the present work we set out to (a) review the notion of team mental models (TMM); (b) identify the key concepts and thinking behind their development; (c) demonstrate how they support teamworking performance; and (d) outline a three‐phase model of TMM development. Details on TMM measurement are given, before concluding with a discussion of the difficulties facing researchers who wish to study and utilize the notion, and some of the pressing research issues that need investigation. © 2004 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. Hum Factors Man 14: 331–352, 2004.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
A Dynamic Theory of Organizational Knowledge Creation
Nonaka, I. (1994) · Organization Science · doi:10.1287/orsc.5.1.14 · Cited by 17,809
Developmental sequence in small groups.
Tuckman, B. W. (1965) · Psychological Bulletin · doi:10.1037/h0022100 · Cited by 5,778
Acquisition of cognitive skill
Anderson, J. R. (1982) · Psychological Review · doi:10.1037/0033-295x.89.4.369 · Cited by 3,663
Stages of Small-Group Development Revisited
Tuckman, B. W., & Jensen, M. A. C. (1977) · Group & Organization Studies · doi:10.1177/105960117700200404 · Cited by 2,679
Olson, G. M., & Olson, J. S. (2000) · Human–Computer Interaction · doi:10.1207/s15327051hci1523_4 · Cited by 1,983 · cited 1×
“Groups with common ground, loosely coupled work, and readiness to use collaborative technology, have a chance at succeeding with remote work (Olson & Olson, 2000).”
Cited by
Metaphor No More: A 15-Year Review of the Team Mental Model Construct
Mohammed, S., Ferzandi, L., & Hamilton, K. (2010) · Journal of Management · doi:10.1177/0149206309356804 · Cited by 832
Cooke, N. J., Gorman, J. C., Myers, C. W., & Duran, J. L. (2013) · Cognitive Science · doi:10.1111/cogs.12009 · Cited by 522
Borrego, M., Karlin, J., McNair, L. D., & Beddoes, K. (2013) · Journal of Engineering Education · doi:10.1002/jee.20023 · Cited by 330
The effects of virtualness on teamwork behavioral components: The role of shared mental models
Schmidtke, J. M., & Cummings, A. (2017) · Human Resource Management Review · doi:10.1016/j.hrmr.2016.12.011 · Cited by 61
Petsolari, M., Ibrahim, S. B., & Slovak, P. (2024) · Proceedings of the CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems · doi:10.1145/3613904.3642619 · Cited by 35
Metadata
- Authors
- Langan‐Fox, J., Anglim, J., & Wilson, J. R.
- Venue
- Human Factors and Ergonomics in Manufacturing & Service Industries
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2004-09
- Volume
- 14
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 331-352
- ISSN
- 1090-8471 (ISSN-L)
- 1520-6564
- OpenAlex
- W2020471348
- Cited by
- 180
- References
- 5
- FWCI
- 7.22
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.