Activity and plasticity in the CA1, the dentate gyrus, and the amygdala following controllable vs. uncontrollable water stress
Abstract
The level of controllability has been shown to modulate the effects of stress on physiology and behavior. In the present study, we investigated the effects of controllable vs. uncontrollable stressors on plasticity in hippocampal CA1, the dentate gyrus (DG), and basal amygdala nucleus (B) in the rat, using the electrophysiological procedure of long‐term potentiation (LTP). A naive group was left undisturbed until the electrophysiological recording commenced. Rats of the two controllable stress groups were trained in the Morris water maze to locate an invisible underwater platform (the first group), or visible platform (the second group), thus escaping from the water, before the recording. The uncontrollable stress group underwent the same procedure (exposure time to water was adjusted to the averaged exposure time of the first controllable group) without the escape platform. We first assessed the effects of stress and controllability on LTP in CA1. Both controllable stressors and the uncontrollable stress impaired CA1 LTP, with a more robust effect induced by the uncontrollable stress. We further assessed the effects of the same procedures on LTP in DG and B. The uncontrollable stress enhanced LTP in DG and increased baseline responses (suggesting uncontrollable stress‐induced plasticity) in the amygdala. All the stressors decreased amygdalar LTP. An assessment of plasma levels of corticosterone (CORT), following the behavioral procedures, revealed an enhancement in CORT release following the uncontrollable, but not controllable stress, indicating the uncontrollable condition as the most stressful. These findings provide insight into the differential effects of stress and stress controllability on different hippocampal subregions and the amygdala. © 2005 Wiley‐Liss, Inc.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Rats given water maze training exhibited a reduction in the magnitude of LTP in the basal amygdala in response to tetanizing stimulation of the EC.
“Kavushanky et al. [346], who showed that rats given water maze training exhibited a reduction in the magnitude of LTP in the basal amygdala in response to tetanizing stimulation of the EC.”
From The Temporal Dynamics Model of Emotional Memory Processing: A Synthesis on the Neurobiological Basis of Stress-Induced Amnesia, Flashbulb and Traumatic Memories, and the Yerkes-Dodson Law (2007) · cites this paper as Kavushanky et al. [346]
Cites
Learned helplessness: Theory and evidence
Maier, S. F., & Seligman, M. E. (1976) · Journal of Experimental Psychology: General · doi:10.1037/0096-3445.105.1.3 · Cited by 2,494 · see citing works
THE AMYGDALA MODULATES THE CONSOLIDATION OF MEMORIES OF EMOTIONALLY AROUSING EXPERIENCES
McGaugh, J. L. (2004) · Annual Review of Neuroscience · doi:10.1146/annurev.neuro.27.070203.144157 · Cited by 2,296 · see citing works
Fear conditioning induces associative long-term potentiation in the amygdala
Rogan, M. T., Stäubli, U. V., & LeDoux, J. E. (1997) · Nature · doi:10.1038/37601 · Cited by 1,310 · see citing works
Maroun, M., & Richter-Levin, G. (2003) · The Journal of Neuroscience · doi:10.1523/jneurosci.23-11-04406.2003 · Cited by 293 · see citing works
Self-citation
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Diamond, D. M., Campbell, A. M., Park, C. R., Halonen, J., & Zoladz, P. R. (2007) · Neural Plasticity · doi:10.1155/2007/60803 · Cited by 762 · see citing works
“Comparable findings were re-ported recently by Kavushanky et al. [346], who showed that rats given water maze training exhibited a reduction in the magnitude of LTP in the basal amygdala in response to tetanizing stimulation of the EC.”
MethodCorticosteroid hormones in the central stress response: Quick-and-slow
de Kloet, E. R., Karst, H., & Joëls, M. (2008) · Frontiers in Neuroendocrinology · doi:10.1016/j.yfrne.2007.10.002 · Cited by 391 · see citing works
Chronic stress: Implications for neuronal morphology, function and neurogenesis
Joëls, M., Karst, H., Krugers, H. J., & Lucassen, P. J. (2007) · Frontiers in Neuroendocrinology · doi:10.1016/j.yfrne.2007.04.001 · Cited by 381 · see citing works
Myers, B., McKlveen, J. M., & Herman, J. P. (2014) · Frontiers in Neuroendocrinology · doi:10.1016/j.yfrne.2013.12.003 · Cited by 318 · see citing works
Zohar, J., Yahalom, H., Kozlovsky, N., Cwikel-Hamzany, S., Matar, M. A., Kaplan, Z., Yehuda, R., & Cohen, H. (2011) · European Neuropsychopharmacology · doi:10.1016/j.euroneuro.2011.06.001 · Cited by 292 · see citing works
Self-citationBagot, R. C., van Hasselt, F. N., Champagne, D. L., Meaney, M. J., Krugers, H. J., & Joëls, M. (2009) · Neurobiology of Learning and Memory · doi:10.1016/j.nlm.2009.03.004 · Cited by 216 · see citing works
Stress‐induced dynamic routing of hippocampal connectivity: A hypothesis
Segal, M., Richter‐Levin, G., & Maggio, N. (2010) · Hippocampus · doi:10.1002/hipo.20751 · Cited by 146 · see citing works
Self-citationEnvironmental programming of susceptibility and resilience to stress in adulthood in male mice
Peña, C. J., Nestler, E. J., & Bagot, R. C. (2019) · Frontiers in Behavioral Neuroscience · doi:10.3389/fnbeh.2019.00040 · Cited by 97 · see citing works
Maroun, M. (2006) · European Journal of Neuroscience · doi:10.1111/j.1460-9568.2006.05169.x · Cited by 82 · see citing works
Amygdala modulation of memory-related processes in the hippocampus: potential relevance to PTSD
Tsoory, M. M., Vouimba, R. M., Akirav, I., Kavushansky, A., Avital, A., & Richter-Levin, G. (2007) · Progress in Brain Research · doi:10.1016/s0079-6123(07)67003-4 · Cited by 78 · see citing works
Self-citationEffects of repeated stress on excitatory drive of basal amygdala neurons in vivo
Padival, M., Quinette, D., & Rosenkranz, J. A. (2013) · Neuropsychopharmacology · doi:10.1038/npp.2013.74 · Cited by 75 · see citing works
Steroid modulation of hippocampal plasticity: switching between cognitive and emotional memories
Maggio, N., & Segal, M. (2012) · Frontiers in Cellular Neuroscience · doi:10.3389/fncel.2012.00012 · Cited by 60 · see citing works
- Authors
- Kavushansky, A., Vouimba, R., Cohen, H., & Richter‐Levin, G.
- Affiliations
- University of Haifa (IL)
- Ben-Gurion University of the Negev (IL)
- Corresponding author
- Richter‐Levin, Gal
- Venue
- Hippocampus
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2005-09-30
- Volume
- 16
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 35-42
- ISSN
- 1050-9631 (ISSN-L)
- 1098-1063
- OpenAlex
- W2108079270
- Cited by
- 141
- References
- 4
- Citations by year
- 2025: 1 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 4 · 2020: 5 · 2019: 2 · 2018: 5 · 2017: 10 · 2016: 2 · 2015: 9 · 2014: 10 · 2013: 10 · 2012: 11
- FWCI
- 5.03
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Hippocampus (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Behavioral Neuroscience › Stress Responses and Cortisol
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Memory and Neural Mechanisms
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience › Neuroscience and Neuropharmacology Research
- Keywords
- uncontrollable stress, hippocampal CA1, dentate gyrus, basal amygdala, long-term potentiation, synaptic plasticity, corticosterone, stress-induced plasticity, hippocampal subfields
- MeSH terms
- Amygdala, Animals, Corticosterone, Electrophysiology, Hippocampus, Neuronal Plasticity, Stress, Psychological, Rats, Sprague-Dawley, Long-Term Potentiation, Maze Learning, Dentate Gyrus, Rats
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review