Cited by 117Memory and Neural MechanismsSpatial Cognition and NavigationNeurogenesis and neuroplasticity mechanisms

Navigation by fragment fitting: A theory of hippocampal function

Worden, Robert·1992·Hippocampus

Abstract

This paper describes a computational theory of spatial learning and navigation and its possible realization in the hippocampus. In the theory, mammals store memories of their geographical environment as a large number of independent fragments. A typical fragment denotes a few prominent landmarks in some region, their geometric relations, and their nongemetric properties, such as smells and visual cues. Navigation involves piecing together current sense data and relevant fragments to form a local map of the animal's surroundings; this is like solving a jigsaw puzzle. This computational model has been implemented in a computer program, whose performance is broadly consistent with observed levels of animal performance, and laboratory results, in spatial learning. Possible realizations of the model in animal brains are discussed. Unlike some neural net models of spatial learning, the model is strongly geometric, and uses special neural structures to store and manipulate two‐dimensional vectors and bearings. A possible neural architecture is described in which the hippocampus performs the geometric operatios; this has a long‐term memory for fragments (somewhere in the neocortex), which can associatively recall fragments into a number of parallel fragment fitters, in the dentate gyrus and CA3 regions. These vary the positions and orientations of their fragments, to optimize the fit of the fragments to each other and to the animal's recent sense data. A local map of the animal's surroundings is stored in CA1 and subicular regions, where matching of fragment positions and attributes takes place. Mismatches are passed back via the entorhinal cortex to improve the fit during the next hippocampal theta cycle. The model offers the potential for understading current data on spatial learning, on the neuroanatomy of the hippocampus and on place cells in a coherent framework, as well as understanding the role of the hippocampus in nonpositional memory tasks. Comparisons with experimental data are given.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1002/hipo.450020208

Cites

4 of 4 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • A number of neurobiologically inspired, fully mechanistic computational models of navigational behavior have been developed to account for the ability of animals relying on allocentric frameworks to perform path planning without resorting to mentalistic explanations.

    “A number of neurobiologically inspired, fully mechanistic computational models of navigational behavior have been developed to account for the ability of animals relying on allocentric frameworks to perform path planning, without the need to resort to “mentalistic” explanations”

    From Spatial Cognition in Teleost Fish: Strategies and Mechanisms (2021) · cites this paper as [95]

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Worden, R.
Corresponding author
Worden, Robert
Venue
Hippocampus
Publisher
Wiley
Published
1992-04-02
Volume
2
Issue
2
Pages
165-187
ISSN
  • 1050-9631 (ISSN-L)
  • 1098-1063
OpenAlex
W1998338384
Cited by
117
References
4
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 2 · 2023: 1 · 2021: 2 · 2020: 1 · 2019: 2 · 2018: 1 · 2017: 3 · 2015: 2 · 2014: 2 · 2013: 1 · 2012: 1
FWCI
8.60
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Hippocampus (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Memory and Neural Mechanisms
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Automotive Engineering › Spatial Cognition and Navigation
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Developmental Neuroscience › Neurogenesis and neuroplasticity mechanisms
Keywords
hippocampal function, spatial learning, spatial navigation, computational model, place cells, dentate gyrus, CA3, CA1, entorhinal cortex, geometric memory, neural architecture
MeSH terms
Animals, Brain Mapping, Cognition, Hippocampus, Learning, Mammals, Memory, Models, Neurological, Models, Psychological, Neurons, Space Perception

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review