Navigation by fragment fitting: A theory of hippocampal function
Abstract
This paper describes a computational theory of spatial learning and navigation and its possible realization in the hippocampus. In the theory, mammals store memories of their geographical environment as a large number of independent fragments. A typical fragment denotes a few prominent landmarks in some region, their geometric relations, and their nongemetric properties, such as smells and visual cues. Navigation involves piecing together current sense data and relevant fragments to form a local map of the animal's surroundings; this is like solving a jigsaw puzzle. This computational model has been implemented in a computer program, whose performance is broadly consistent with observed levels of animal performance, and laboratory results, in spatial learning. Possible realizations of the model in animal brains are discussed. Unlike some neural net models of spatial learning, the model is strongly geometric, and uses special neural structures to store and manipulate two‐dimensional vectors and bearings. A possible neural architecture is described in which the hippocampus performs the geometric operatios; this has a long‐term memory for fragments (somewhere in the neocortex), which can associatively recall fragments into a number of parallel fragment fitters, in the dentate gyrus and CA3 regions. These vary the positions and orientations of their fragments, to optimize the fit of the fragments to each other and to the animal's recent sense data. A local map of the animal's surroundings is stored in CA1 and subicular regions, where matching of fragment positions and attributes takes place. Mismatches are passed back via the entorhinal cortex to improve the fit during the next hippocampal theta cycle. The model offers the potential for understading current data on spatial learning, on the neuroanatomy of the hippocampus and on place cells in a coherent framework, as well as understanding the role of the hippocampus in nonpositional memory tasks. Comparisons with experimental data are given.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
A number of neurobiologically inspired, fully mechanistic computational models of navigational behavior have been developed to account for the ability of animals relying on allocentric frameworks to perform path planning without resorting to mentalistic explanations.
“A number of neurobiologically inspired, fully mechanistic computational models of navigational behavior have been developed to account for the ability of animals relying on allocentric frameworks to perform path planning, without the need to resort to “mentalistic” explanations”
From Spatial Cognition in Teleost Fish: Strategies and Mechanisms (2021) · cites this paper as [95]
Cites
McClelland, J. L., Rumelhart, D. E., & AU (1987) · doi:10.7551/mitpress/5237.001.0001 · Cited by 3,315 · see citing works
Zola-Morgan, S., Squire, L., & Amaral, D. (1986) · The Journal of Neuroscience · doi:10.1523/jneurosci.06-10-02950.1986 · Cited by 1,997 · see citing works
The effects of changes in the environment on the spatial firing of hippocampal complex-spike cells
Muller, R., & Kubie, J. (1987) · The Journal of Neuroscience · doi:10.1523/jneurosci.07-07-01951.1987 · Cited by 1,581 · see citing works
Hippocampal synaptic enhancement and information storage within a distributed memory system
McNaughton, B. L., & Morris, R. G. M. (1987) · Trends in Neurosciences · doi:10.1016/0166-2236(87)90011-7 · Cited by 1,304 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
On the role of the hippocampus in learning and memory in the rat.
Jarrard, L. E. (1993) · Behavioral and Neural Biology · doi:10.1016/0163-1047(93)90664-4 · Cited by 1,125 · see citing works
The Hippocampus, Memory, and Place Cells
Eichenbaum, H., Dudchenko, P., Wood, E., Shapiro, M., & Tanila, H. (1999) · Neuron · doi:10.1016/s0896-6273(00)80773-4 · Cited by 1,064 · see citing works
Spatial representation in the hippocampal formation: a history
Moser, E. I., Moser, M.-B., & McNaughton, B. L. (2017) · Nature Neuroscience · doi:10.1038/nn.4653 · Cited by 560 · see citing works
Event memory: A theory of memory for laboratory, autobiographical, and fictional events.
Rubin, D. C., & Umanath, S. (2015) · Psychological Review · doi:10.1037/a0037907 · Cited by 379 · see citing works
A Model of Spatial Map Formation in the Hippocampus of the Rat
Blum, K. I., & Abbott, L. F. (1996) · Neural Computation · doi:10.1162/neco.1996.8.1.85 · Cited by 352 · see citing works
McNaughton, N., Kocsis, B., & Hajós, M. (2007) · Behavioural Pharmacology · doi:10.1097/fbp.0b013e3282ee82e3 · Cited by 187 · see citing works
Landmark stability is a prerequisite for spatial but not discrimination learning
Biegler, R., & Morris, R. G. M. (1993) · Nature · doi:10.1038/361631a0 · Cited by 181 · see citing works
Place and cue learning in turtles
López, J. C., Rodríguez, F., Gómez, Y., Vargas, J. P., Broglio, C., & Salas, C. (2000) · Animal Learning & Behavior · doi:10.3758/bf03200270 · Cited by 66 · see citing works
Spatial Cognition in Teleost Fish: Strategies and Mechanisms
Rodríguez, F., Quintero, B., Amores, L., Madrid, D., Salas-Peña, C., & Salas, C. (2021) · Animals · doi:10.3390/ani11082271 · Cited by 59 · see citing works
- Authors
- Worden, R.
- Corresponding author
- Worden, Robert
- ORCID
- Worden, Robert
- Venue
- Hippocampus
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 1992-04-02
- Volume
- 2
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 165-187
- ISSN
- 1050-9631 (ISSN-L)
- 1098-1063
- OpenAlex
- W1998338384
- Cited by
- 117
- References
- 4
- Citations by year
- 2026: 1 · 2025: 2 · 2023: 1 · 2021: 2 · 2020: 1 · 2019: 2 · 2018: 1 · 2017: 3 · 2015: 2 · 2014: 2 · 2013: 1 · 2012: 1
- FWCI
- 8.60
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Hippocampus (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Memory and Neural Mechanisms
- Physical Sciences › Engineering › Automotive Engineering › Spatial Cognition and Navigation
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Developmental Neuroscience › Neurogenesis and neuroplasticity mechanisms
- Keywords
- hippocampal function, spatial learning, spatial navigation, computational model, place cells, dentate gyrus, CA3, CA1, entorhinal cortex, geometric memory, neural architecture
- MeSH terms
- Animals, Brain Mapping, Cognition, Hippocampus, Learning, Mammals, Memory, Models, Neurological, Models, Psychological, Neurons, Space Perception
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review