The DOI matches its Crossref record; 7 of the 7 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Selective damage to the hippocampal region blocks long‐term retention of a natural and nonspatial stimulus‐stimulus association
Abstract
Normal rats rapidly acquire and remember associations between nonspatial stimuli as expressed in the social transmission of food preferences. In the present study, rats with selective neurotoxic lesions including all subdivisions of the hippocampal region (hippocampus proper, dentate gyrus, and subiculum) normally acquired and briefly retained the food odor association as demonstrated by intact memory immediately after social training. However, long‐term memory in these animals was severly impaired in contrast to strong 24‐h retention by intact rats. More selective lesions to the hippocampus proper plus dentate gyrus alone, or the subiculum alone had no effect on memory at either test interval. These finding indicate that the hippocampal region is required for long‐term retention of a nonspatial form of natural memory. © 1995 Wiley‐Liss, Inc.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Memory and the hippocampus: A synthesis from findings with rats, monkeys, and humans.
Squire, L. R. (1992) · Psychological Review · doi:10.1037/0033-295x.99.2.195 · Cited by 5,376
Differential contribution of amygdala and hippocampus to cued and contextual fear conditioning.
Phillips, R. G., & LeDoux, J. E. (1992) · Behavioral Neuroscience · doi:10.1037/0735-7044.106.2.274 · Cited by 3,292
Implicit memory: History and current status.
Schacter, D. L. (1987) · Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition · doi:10.1037/0278-7393.13.3.501 · Cited by 2,983
Modality-Specific Retrograde Amnesia of Fear
Kim, J. J., & Fanselow, M. S. (1992) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.1585183 · Cited by 2,483
Cohen, N. J., & Squire, L. R. (1980) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.7414331 · Cited by 2,296
Hippocampus, space, and memory
Olton, D. S., Becker, J. T., & Handelmann, G. E. (1979) · Behavioral and Brain Sciences · doi:10.1017/s0140525x00062713 · Cited by 2,018
Gaffan, D. (1994) · Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience · doi:10.1162/jocn.1994.6.4.305 · Cited by 484
Cited by
Regional dissociations within the hippocampus-memory and anxiety
Bannerman, D. M., Rawlins, J. N. P., McHugh, S. B., Deacon, R. M. J., Yee, B. K., Bast, T., Zhang, W.-N., Pothuizen, H. H. J., & Feldon, J. (2004) · Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews · doi:10.1016/j.neubiorev.2004.03.004 · Cited by 1,462
Silva, A. J., Kogan, J. H., Frankland, P. W., & Kida, S. (1998) · Annual Review of Neuroscience · doi:10.1146/annurev.neuro.21.1.127 · Cited by 1,462
The Hippocampus, Memory, and Place Cells
Eichenbaum, H., Dudchenko, P., Wood, E., Shapiro, M., & Tanila, H. (1999) · Neuron · doi:10.1016/s0896-6273(00)80773-4 · Cited by 1,064
Self-citationRampon, C., Tang, Y.-P., Goodhouse, J., Shimizu, E., Kyin, M., & Tsien, J. Z. (2000) · Nature Neuroscience · doi:10.1038/72945 · Cited by 755
Jessberger, S., Clark, R. E., Broadbent, N. J., Clemenson, G. D., Consiglio, A., Lie, D. C., Squire, L. R., & Gage, F. H. (2009) · Learning & Memory · doi:10.1101/lm.1172609 · Cited by 654
Metadata
- Authors
- Bunsey, M., & Eichenbaum, H.
- Venue
- Hippocampus
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 1995-01
- Volume
- 5
- Issue
- 6
- Pages
- 546-556
- ISSN
- 1050-9631 (ISSN-L)
- 1098-1063
- OpenAlex
- W1990178385
- Cited by
- 265
- References
- 7
- FWCI
- 9.96
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Selective damage to the hippocampal region blocks long‐term retention of a natural and nonspatial stimulus‐stimulus association. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1002/hipo.450050606
- The paper
- Bunsey, M., & Eichenbaum, H. (1995). Selective damage to the hippocampal region blocks long‐term retention of a natural and nonspatial stimulus‐stimulus association. Hippocampus. https://doi.org/10.1002/hipo.450050606
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
