Cited by 14Health Literacy and Information AccessibilityOvarian function and disordersObesity and Health Practices

Health literacy needs in weight management of women with Polycystic Ovary Syndrome

Open access
Lim, Siew, Smith, Caroline A., Costello, Michael F., MacMillan, Freya, Moran, Lisa, Teede, Helena, Ee, Carolyn·2021·Health Promotion Journal of Australia

Abstract

Issue addressed: Lifestyle modification plays a key role in weight management and chronic disease prevention in polycystic ovary syndrome (PCOS). Women with PCOS experience challenges in adopting and maintaining healthy lifestyle behaviours, which may be related to health literacy. The aims of this study were to explore the health literacy needs of women with PCOS in lifestyle and weight management to inform research and practice. Methods: Ten women with PCOS participated in focus groups and semi‐structured telephone interviews on lifestyle and weight management in PCOS. Results: For functional health literacy, women with PCOS are highly motivated for lifestyle and weight management due to the long‐term consequences of PCOS. For interactive health literacy, barriers included delayed diagnosis and poor communication. Women with PCOS were resourceful in accessing a wide range of weight management services but some experience barriers such as costs or the feelings of embarrassment associated with accessing relevant services. For critical health literacy, no facilitators and barriers could be identified for the domain of participation in making decisions for health. Conclusions: Women with PCOS experience facilitators and barriers in functional and interactive health literacy in lifestyle and weight management. So what?: Future interventions should seek to further understand and address these gaps in health literacy by increasing weight management skills through behaviour change techniques, improving health professional‐patient communication through tools such as question prompt lists, enhancing peer support by increasing distributed health literacy in PCOS support groups and by providing opportunities for co‐design of interventions.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1002/hpja.349

Cites

0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Nine included papers report on patients' own preferences, views, and experiences of the IoT for PCOS-related reasons.

    “Nine included papers report on patients’ own preferences, views, and experiences of the IoT for PCOS-related reasons [17,44,45,97,98,99,100,101,102] (Supplementary File S4).”

    From Polycystic Ovary Syndrome and the Internet of Things: A Scoping Review (2024) · cites this paper as [44]

    The Results and Interactive health literacy sections report women with PCOS describing positive and negative experiences of online support groups. The paper therefore supports the patient-experience aspect, but it does not study the Internet of Things as such. The count of nine included papers belongs to the citing review, not to this individual study. (LLM, conf=0.78)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Women with PCOS brought attention to the negative aspect of reading online comments and how it can lead to distress, feeling isolated, and anxiety, especially for those trying to get pregnant.

    “Women with PCOS brought attention to the negative aspect of reading online comments and how it can lead to distress, feeling isolated, and even anxiety, especially for those trying to get pregnant [44,45,101].”

    From Polycystic Ovary Syndrome and the Internet of Things: A Scoping Review (2024) · cites this paper as [44]

    The Interactive health literacy discussion (section 4.2; page unavailable) reports negative experiences with online PCOS support groups and cites a past study linking others’ negative posts to anxiety. It discusses isolation separately as a possible consequence of lacking peer support. It does not link online comments to isolation or distress specifically, or identify women trying to get pregnant as especially affected. (LLM, conf=0.85)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Positive feedback regarding online forums as a place for support by connecting with others and finding anecdotal information was shared in three Australian studies, one UK study, and one Canada study.

    “Nevertheless, positive feedback regarding how those with PCOS consider online forums to be a place where they can find support by connecting with others going through relatable struggles, finding anecdotal information was shared in three Australian studies [44,45,102], one in the UK [101], and one in Canada [98].”
  • Publication dates of participant voices papers ranged from 2007 to 2023, with the majority from Australia (n = 6), two from the UK, and one from Canada.

    “The publication dates ranged from 2007 to 2023, with the majority originating from Australia (n = 6) [17,44,45,97,99,102], while two originated from the UK [100,101], and one from Canada [98].”
  • There has been very limited research on health literacy in women with PCOS.

    “However, there has been very limited research on health literacy in women with PCOS, as discussed below [89,90].”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 34

  1. Broekmans FJ, Knauff EAH, Valkenburg O, Laven JS, Eijkemans MJ, Fauser BCJM. PCOS according to the Rotterdam consensus criteria: change in prevalence among WHO-II anovulation and association with metabolic factors. BJOG. 2006;113:1210-7.
  2. Bozdag G, Mumusoglu S, Zengin D, Karabulut E, Yildiz BO. The prevalence and phenotypic features of polycystic ovary syn- drome: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Hum Reprod. 2016;31:2841-55.
  3. Moran LJ, Misso ML, Wild RA, Norman RJ. Impaired glucose toler- ance, type 2 diabetes and metabolic syndrome in polycystic ovary syndrome: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Hum Reprod Update. 2010;16:347-63.
  4. Kakoly NS, Khomami MB, Joham AE, Cooray SD, Misso ML, Norman RJ, et al. Ethnicity, obesity and the prevalence of impaired glucose tolerance and type 2 diabetes in PCOS: a systematic review and meta-regression. Hum Reprod Update. 2018;24:455-67.
  5. Kaczmarek C, Haller DM, Yaron M. Health-related quality of life in adolescents and young adults with polycystic ovary syndrome: a systematic review. J Pediatr Adolesc Gynecol. 2016;29:551-7.
  6. Nasiri Amiri F, Ramezani Tehrani F, Simbar M, Montazeri A, Mohammadpour Thamtan RA. The experience of women affected by polycystic ovary syndrome: a qualitative study from iran. Int J Endocrinol Metab. 2014;12:e13612.
  7. Pastore LM, Patrie JT, Morris WL, Dalal P, Bray MJ. Depression symptoms and body dissatisfaction association among polycystic ovary syndrome women. J Psychosom Res. 2011;71:270-6.
  8. Lim SS, Davies MJ, Norman RJ, Moran LJ. Overweight, obesity and central obesity in women with polycystic ovary syndrome: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Hum Reprod Update. 2012;18:618-37.
  9. Barbieri RL, Makris A, Randall RW, Daniels G, Kistner RW, Ryan KJ. Insulin stimulates androgen accumulation in incubations of ovar- ian stroma obtained from women with hyperandrogenism. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 1986;62:904-10.
  10. Zheng Y, Manson JE, Yuan C, Liang MH, Grodstein F, Stampfer MJ, et al. Associations of weight gain from early to middle adulthood with major health outcomes later in life. JAMA. 2017;318:255-69.
  11. Nutbeam D. Health promotion glossary. Health Promotion. 1986;1:113-27.
  12. Nutbeam D. Health literacy as a public health goal: a challenge for contemporary health education and communication strategies into the 21st century. Health Promot Int. 2000;15:259-67.
  13. Berkman ND, Sheridan SL, Donahue KE, Halpern DJ, Crotty K. Low health literacy and health outcomes: an updated systematic review. Ann Intern Med. 2011;155:97-107.
  14. Cheng Y-L, Shu J-H, Hsu H-C, Liang Y, Chou R-H, Hsu P-F, et al. High health literacy is associated with less obesity and lower Framingham risk score: sub-study of the VGH-HEALTHCARE trial. PLoS ONE. 2018;13:e0194813.
  15. Osborne RH, Batterham RW, Elsworth GR, Hawkins M, Buchbinder R. The grounded psychometric development and initial validation of the Health Literacy Questionnaire (HLQ). BMC Public Health. 2013;13:658.
  16. Nutbeam D. The evolving concept of health literacy. Soc Sci Med. 2008;67:2072-8.
  17. Lim S, Beauchamp A, Dodson S, O'Hara J, McPhee C, Fulton A, et al. Health literacy and fruit and vegetable intake in rural Australia. Public Health Nutr. 2017;20:2680-4.
  18. Moran LJ, Ranasinha S, Zoungas S, McNaughton SA, Brown WJ, Teede HJ. The contribution of diet, physical activity and sedentary behaviour to body mass index in women with and without polycys- tic ovary syndrome. Human Reprod. 2013;28:2276-83.
  19. Banting LK, Gibson-Helm M, Polman R, Teede HJ, Stepto NK. Physical activity and mental health in women with polycystic ovary syndrome. BMC Women's Health. 2014;14:51.
  20. Kataoka J, Tassone E, Misso M, Joham A, Stener-Victorin E, Teede H, et al. Weight management interventions in women with and without PCOS. A systematic review. Nutrients. 2017;9:996.
  21. Ee C, Smith C, Costello M, MacMillan F, Moran L, Baylock B, et al. Feasibility and acceptability of a proposed trial of acupuncture as an adjunct to lifestyle interventions for weight loss in Polycystic Ovary Syndrome: a qualitative study. BMC Complement Altern Med. 2018;18:298.
  22. Liamputtong P, Ezzy D. Qualitative research methods, 3rd edn. South Melbourne, Vic: Oxford University Press; 2009.
  23. Batterham RW, Hawkins M, Collins PA, Buchbinder R, Osborne RH. Health literacy: applying current concepts to improve health ser- vices and reduce health inequalities. Public Health. 2016;132:3-12.
  24. Moran LJ, Brown WJ, McNaughton SA, Joham AE, Teede HJ. Weight management practices associated with PCOS and their relation- ships with diet and physical activity. Hum Reprod. 2017;32:669-78.
  25. Mulquiney KJ, Tapley A, van Driel ML, Morgan S, Davey AR, Henderson KM, et al. Referrals to dietitians/nutritionists: a cross-sectional analysis of Australian GP registrars' clinical practice. Nutr Diet. 2018;75:98-105.
  26. Michie S, Abraham C, Whittington C, McAteer J, Gupta S. Effective techniques in healthy eating and physical activity interventions: a meta-regression. Health Psychol. 2009;28:690-701.
  27. Bazarganipour F, Taghavi SA, Allan H, Hosseini N. Facilitating and inhibiting factors related to treatment adherence in women with polycystic ovary syndrome: a qualitative study. Int J Reprod Biomed (Yazd). 2017;15:553-60.
  28. Crete J, Adamshick P. Managing polycystic ovary syndrome: what our patients are telling us. J Holistic Nurs. 2011;29:256-66.
  29. Khan NN, Vincent A, Boyle JA, Burggraf M, Pillay M, Teede H, et al. Development of a question prompt list for women with polycystic ovary syndrome. Fertil Steril. 2018;110:514-22.
  30. Xie J, Burstein F, Garad R, Teede HJ, Boyle JA. Personalized mobile tool AskPCOS delivering evidence-based quality information about Polycystic Ovary Syndrome. Semin Reprod Med. 2018;36:66-72.
  31. Amundsen A, Bergvik S, Butow P, Tattersall MHN, Sorlie T, Nordoy T. Supporting doctor-patient communication: providing a question prompt list and audio recording of the consultation as communi- cation aids to outpatients in a cancer clinic. Patient Educ Couns. 2018;101:1594-600.
  32. Edwards M, Wood F, Davies M, Edwards A. 'Distributed health lit- eracy': longitudinal qualitative analysis of the roles of health liter- acy mediators and social networks of people living with a long-term health condition. Health Expect. 2015;18:1180-93.
  33. Sentell T, Zhang W, Davis J, Baker KK, Braun KL. The influence of community and individual health literacy on self-reported health status. J Gen Intern Med. 2014;29:298-304.
  34. Greenhalgh T, Jackson C, Shaw S, Janamian T. Achieving re- search impact through co-creation in community-based health services: literature review and case study. Milbank Q. 2016;94: 392-429.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Lim, S., Smith, C. A., Costello, M. F., MacMillan, F., Moran, L., Teede, H., & Ee, C.
Affiliations
  • Monash University (AU)
  • Western Sydney University (AU)
  • Royal Hospital for Women (AU)
  • Monash Medical Centre (AU)
Corresponding author
Ee, Carolyn
Venue
Health Promotion Journal of Australia
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2020-05-26
Volume
32
Issue
S1
Pages
41-48
ISSN
  • 1036-1073 (ISSN-L)
  • 2201-1617
OpenAlex
W3020319353
Cited by
14
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 1 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 2
FWCI
2.09
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Health Promotion Journal of Australia (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Health Literacy and Information Accessibility
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Reproductive Medicine › Ovarian function and disorders
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › Pharmacy › Obesity and Health Practices
Keywords
polycystic ovary syndrome, health literacy, weight management, lifestyle modification, functional health literacy, interactive health literacy, critical health literacy, barriers to health services, health professional-patient communication, peer support, behaviour change techniques, women's health
MeSH terms
Female, Humans, Life Style, Polycystic Ovary Syndrome, Health Literacy

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review