Cited by 609Dietetics, Nutrition, and EducationPatient-Provider Communication in HealthcareObesity and Health Practices

Barriers to Providing Nutrition Counseling by Physicians: A Survey of Primary Care Practitioners

Kushner, R.F.·1995·Preventive Medicine

Abstract

Background Previous surveys have shown that there is a disparity between physicians' beliefs about the importance of diet and nutrition in health maintenance and disease prevention and the actual delivery of nutrition counseling. The primary objective of this study was to assess the current attitudes, practice behavior, and barriers to the delivery of nutrition counseling by primary care physicians.Methods A random-sample-mailed questionnaire was sent to 2,250 primary care physicians selected from the AMA masterfile from general practice, internal medicine, and pediatrics, representing self-employed, group, hospital, and HMO practices. Participants were stratified by age, gender, geographical region, and present employment. The main outcome measures were to determine time spent by physicians providing and percentage of patients receiving dietary counseling and to identify barriers to the delivery of nutrition counseling.Results A 49% response rate (n = 1,103) was obtained. Results are presented for the 1,030 physicians (70% private practice) with complete data. Over two-thirds of physicians provide dietary counseling to 40% or less of patients and spend 5 or fewer min discussing dietary changes. Despite this pattern, nearly three-quarters of respondents feel that dietary counseling is important and is the responsibility of the physician. Ranking of perceived barriers to delivery of dietary counseling were lack of time, patient noncompliance, inadequate teaching materials, lack of counseling, training, lack of knowledge, inadequate reimbursement, and low physician confidence.Conclusions This survey suggests that multiple barriers exist that prevent the primary care practitioner from providing dietary counseling. A multifaceted approach will be needed to change physician counseling behavior.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1006/pmed.1995.1087

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Kushner, R. F.
Affiliations
University of Chicago (US)
Corresponding author
Kushner, R.F.
Venue
Preventive Medicine
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
1995-11
Volume
24
Issue
6
Pages
546-552
ISSN
0091-7435 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2007745104
Cited by
604
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 9 · 2025: 14 · 2024: 17 · 2023: 19 · 2022: 18 · 2021: 21 · 2020: 15 · 2019: 29 · 2018: 25 · 2017: 27 · 2016: 34 · 2015: 33 · 2014: 27 · 2013: 28 · 2012: 29
FWCI
7.42
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Preventive Medicine (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • National Institutes of Health (5p30dk026678-20)
  • National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases (DK-26678)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › Health Information Management › Dietetics, Nutrition, and Education
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Patient-Provider Communication in Healthcare
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › Pharmacy › Obesity and Health Practices
Keywords
nutrition counseling, primary care physicians, barriers to counseling, physician attitudes, physician practice behavior, time constraints, patient noncompliance, physician confidence, physician training, reimbursement, diet and health
MeSH terms
Adult, Counseling, Female, Humans, Health Knowledge, Attitudes, Practice, Male, Middle Aged, Physicians, Family, Surveys and Questionnaires, Time Factors, United States, Treatment Refusal, Workload, Nutritional Sciences

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review