Cited by 44Mental Health Treatment and AccessPsychiatric care and mental health servicesMigration, Health and Trauma

Who experiences unmet need for mental health services and what other barriers to accessing health care do they face? F indings from A ustralia and C anada

Corscadden, Lisa, Callander, Emily J., Topp, Stephanie M.·2019·The International Journal of Health Planning and Management

Abstract

Summary: Purpose: To examine factors associated with unmet need for mental health services and links with barriers to access to care more broadly. Methodology: The Commonwealth Fund International Health Policy Surveys from 2013 and 2016 were used to explore factors associated with unmet need for adults who experienced emotional distress for 1320 respondents in Australia and 2284 in Canada. Findings: Over one in five adults in Australia (21%) and in Canada (25%) experienced emotional distress, just over half said they received professional help (51% in Australia, 59% in Canada). The majority of those who did not get help indicated did not want to see a professional (37% in Australia, 30% in Canada). For those who did seek help, the factors associated with not receiving care included lower income, higher out‐of‐pocket health care costs, and poorer health. When compared with people with met needs, those with unmet needs for mental health services were more likely to also experience affordability, medication, and trust‐related access barriers (AOR range 2.41 to 7.49 for the two countries, P < 0.01). Conclusion: Including unmet needs for mental health services as part of regular reporting on access to care may bring attention to access barriers for people with mental health conditions.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1002/hpm.2733

Cites

33 of 33 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Corscadden, L., Callander, E. J., & Topp, S. M.
Affiliations
  • Australian Institute of Tropical Health and Medicine (AU)
  • James Cook University (AU)
Corresponding author
Corscadden, Lisa
Venue
The International Journal of Health Planning and Management
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2019-01-18
Volume
34
Issue
2
Pages
761-772
ISSN
  • 0749-6753 (ISSN-L)
  • 1099-1751
OpenAlex
W2910357614
Cited by
44
References
33
Citations by year
2025: 7 · 2024: 9 · 2023: 6 · 2022: 14 · 2021: 5 · 2020: 2 · 2019: 1
FWCI
6.91
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • The International Journal of Health Planning and Management (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • ResearchOnline - JCU (James Cook University) (submittedVersion)
  • Griffith Research Online (submittedVersion)
Funders
James Cook University
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Mental Health Treatment and Access
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Psychiatric care and mental health services
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Migration, Health and Trauma
Keywords
barriers to mental health care, emotional distress, help-seeking, out-of-pocket health care costs, income, access to medicines, trust in healthcare, access to mental health care, Australia, Canada
MeSH terms
Adolescent, Adult, Aged, Australia, Mental Disorders, Canada, Female, Health Services Accessibility, Health Services Needs and Demand, Health Surveys, Humans, Male, Mental Health Services, Middle Aged, Young Adult

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review