The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Denaturing high-performance liquid chromatography: A review
Open accessAbstract
Denaturing high-performance liquid chromatography (DHPLC) compares two or more chromosomes as a mixture of denatured and reannealed PCR amplicons, revealing the presence of a mutation by the differential retention of homo- and heteroduplex DNA on reversed-phase chromatography supports under partial denaturation. Temperature determines sensitivity, and its optimum can be predicted by computation. Single-nucleotide substitutions, deletions, and insertions have been detected successfully by on-line UV or fluorescence monitoring within 2-3 minutes in unpurified amplicons as large as 1.5 Kb. Sensitivity and specificity of DHPLC consistently exceed 96%. These features and its low cost make DHPLC one of the most powerful tools for the re-sequencing of the human and other genomes. Aside from its application to the mutational analysis of candidate genes, DHPLC has proven instrumental in elucidating human evolution and in the mapping of genes. Employing completely denaturing conditions, the utility of DHPLC has been extended to the genotyping of known polymorphisms by utilizing the ability of poly(styrene-divinylbenzene) to resolve single-stranded DNA molecules of identical size that differ in a single base. Under completely denaturing conditions, it is thus possible to resolve all possible base substitutions with the single exception of C-->G transversions. Improvements in throughput became feasible with the recent introduction of monolithic poly(styrene-divinylbenzene) capillaries that lend themselves to the fabrication of arrays connected to a multi-color laser induced fluorescence scanner or a mass spectrometer.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Lichtenstein, P., Holm, N. V., Verkasalo, P. K., Iliadou, A., Kaprio, J., Koskenvuo, M., Pukkala, E., Skytthe, A., & Hemminki, K. (2000) · New England Journal of Medicine · doi:10.1056/nejm200007133430201 · Cited by 4,114
The New Genomics: Global Views of Biology
Lander, E. S. (1996) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.274.5287.536 · Cited by 1,174
Cited by
Nickerson, M. L., Warren, M. B., Toro, J. R., Matrosova, V., Glenn, G., Turner, M. L., Duray, P., Merino, M., Choyke, P., Pavlovich, C. P., et al. (2002) · Cancer Cell · doi:10.1016/s1535-6108(02)00104-6 · Cited by 940
Blay, J.-Y., Bonvalot, S., Casali, P., Choi, H., Debiec-Richter, M., Dei Tos, A. P., Emile, J.-F., Gronchi, A., Hogendoorn, P. C. W., Joensuu, H., et al. (2005) · Annals of Oncology · doi:10.1093/annonc/mdi127 · Cited by 722
High-Resolution DNA Melting Analysis for Simple and Efficient Molecular Diagnostics
Reed, G. H., Kent, J. O., & Wittwer, C. T. (2007) · Pharmacogenomics · doi:10.2217/14622416.8.6.597 · Cited by 678
Efficient discovery of DNA polymorphisms in natural populations by Ecotilling
Comai, L., Young, K., Till, B. J., Reynolds, S. H., Greene, E. A., Codomo, C. A., Enns, L. C., Johnson, J. E., Burtner, C., Odden, A. R., et al. (2004) · The Plant Journal · doi:10.1111/j.0960-7412.2003.01999.x · Cited by 451
Mulley, J. C., Scheffer, I. E., Petrou, S., Dibbens, L. M., Berkovic, S. F., & Harkin, L. A. (2005) · Human Mutation · doi:10.1002/humu.20178 · Cited by 351
Metadata
- Authors
- Xiao, W., & Oefner, P. J.
- Venue
- Human Mutation
- Publisher
- Hindawi Limited
- Published
- 2001
- Volume
- 17
- Issue
- 6
- Pages
- 439-474
- ISSN
- 1059-7794 (ISSN-L)
- 1098-1004
- OpenAlex
- W2054007006
- Cited by
- 725
- References
- 2
- FWCI
- 39.20
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Denaturing high-performance liquid chromatography: A review. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1002/humu.1130
- The paper
- Xiao, W., & Oefner, P. J. (2001). Denaturing high-performance liquid chromatography: A review. Human Mutation. https://doi.org/10.1002/humu.1130
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.