The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Global potential soil erosion with reference to land use and climate changes
Abstract
A GIS‐based RUSLE model is employed to study the global soil erosion potential for viewing the present situation, analysing changes over the past century, and projecting future trends with reference to global changes in land use and climate. Scenarios considered in the study include historical, present and future conditions of cropland and climate. This research gives the first overview of the global situation of soil erosion potential considering the previous century as well as the present and future. Present soil erosion potential is estimated to be about 0·38 mm year−1 for the globe, with Southeast Asia found to be the most seriously affected region in the world. It is estimated that nearly 60% of present soil erosions are induced by human activity. With development of cropland in the last century, soil erosion potential is estimated to have increased by about 17%. Global warming might significantly increase the potential for soil erosion, and the regions with the same increasing trend of precipitation and population might face much more serious problems related to soil erosion in the future. Copyright © 2003 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Estimating historical changes in global land cover: Croplands from 1700 to 1992
Ramankutty, N., & Foley, J. A. (1999) · Global Biogeochemical Cycles · doi:10.1029/1999gb900046 · Cited by 2,074
Cited by
An assessment of the global impact of 21st century land use change on soil erosion
Borrelli, P., Robinson, D. A., Fleischer, L. R., Lugato, E., Ballabio, C., Alewell, C., Meusburger, K., Modugno, S., Schütt, B., Ferro, V., et al. (2017) · Nature Communications · doi:10.1038/s41467-017-02142-7 · Cited by 2,779
Farming the planet: 1. Geographic distribution of global agricultural lands in the year 2000
Ramankutty, N., Evan, A. T., Monfreda, C., & Foley, J. A. (2008) · Global Biogeochemical Cycles · doi:10.1029/2007gb002952 · Cited by 1,942
Using the USLE: Chances, challenges and limitations of soil erosion modelling
Alewell, C., Borrelli, P., Meusburger, K., & Panagos, P. (2019) · International Soil and Water Conservation Research · doi:10.1016/j.iswcr.2019.05.004 · Cited by 804
Crossing Disciplines and Scales to Understand the Critical Zone
Brantley, S. L., Goldhaber, M. B., & Ragnarsdottir, K. V. (2007) · Elements · doi:10.2113/gselements.3.5.307 · Cited by 697
Management of crop water under drought: a review
Bodner, G., Nakhforoosh, A., & Kaul, H.-P. (2015) · Agronomy for Sustainable Development · doi:10.1007/s13593-015-0283-4 · Cited by 629
Metadata
- Authors
- Yang, D., Kanae, S., Oki, T., Koike, T., & Musiake, K.
- Venue
- Hydrological Processes
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2003-09-29
- Volume
- 17
- Issue
- 14
- Pages
- 2913-2928
- ISSN
- 0885-6087 (ISSN-L)
- 1099-1085
- OpenAlex
- W2028855984
- Cited by
- 715
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 7.17
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
