The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Breath gas aldehydes as biomarkers of lung cancer
Abstract
There is experimental evidence that volatile substances in human breath can reflect presence of neoplasma. Volatile aldehydes were determined in exhaled breath of 12 lung cancer patients, 12 smokers and 12 healthy volunteers. Alveolar breath samples were collected under control of expired CO 2. Reactive aldehydes were transformed into stable oximes by means of on‐fiber‐derivatization (SPME‐OFD). Aldehyde concentrations in the ppt and ppb level were determined by means of gas chromatography‐mass spectrometry (GC‐MS). Exhaled concentrations were corrected for inspired values. Exhaled C1–C10 aldehydes could be detected in all healthy volunteers, smokers and lung cancer patients. Concentrations ranged from 7 pmol/l (161 pptV) for butanal to 71 nmol/l (1,582 ppbV) for formaldehyde. Highest inspired concentrations were found for formaldehyde and acetaldehyde (0–55 nmol/l and 0–13 nmol/l, respectively). Acetaldehyde, propanal, butanal, heptanal and decanal concentrations showed no significant differences for cancer patients, smokers and healthy volunteers. Exhaled pentanal, hexanal, octanal and nonanal concentrations were significantly higher in lung cancer patients than in smokers and healthy controls (ppentanal = 0.001; phexanal = 0.006; poctanal = 0.014; pnonanal = 0.025). Sensitivity and specificity of this method were comparable to the diagnostic certitude of conventional serum markers and CT imaging. Lung cancer patients could be identified by means of exhaled pentanal, hexanal, octanal and nonanal concentrations. Exhaled aldehydes reflect aspects of oxidative stress and tumor‐specific tissue composition and metabolism. Noninvasive recognition of lung malignancies may be realized if analytical skills, biochemical knowledge and medical expertise are combined into a joint effort.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Volatile Organic Compounds of Lung Cancer and Possible Biochemical Pathways
Hakim, M., Broza, Y. Y., Barash, O., Peled, N., Phillips, M., Amann, A., & Haick, H. (2012) · Chemical Reviews · doi:10.1021/cr300174a · Cited by 953
Amann, A., Costello, B. D. L., Miekisch, W., Schubert, J., Buszewski, B., Pleil, J., Ratcliffe, N., & Risby, T. (2014) · Journal of Breath Research · doi:10.1088/1752-7155/8/3/034001 · Cited by 804
Self-citationSensors for Breath Testing: From Nanomaterials to Comprehensive Disease Detection
Konvalina, G., & Haick, H. (2014) · Accounts of Chemical Research · doi:10.1021/ar400070m · Cited by 561
Qiao, X., Su, B., Liu, C., Song, Q., Luo, D., Mo, G., & Wang, T. (2018) · Advanced Materials · doi:10.1002/adma.201702275 · Cited by 469
Breath Analysis as a Potential and Non-Invasive Frontier in Disease Diagnosis: An Overview
Pereira, J., Porto-Figueira, P., Cavaco, C., Taunk, K., Rapole, S., Dhakne, R., Nagarajaram, H., & Câmara, J. (2015) · Metabolites · doi:10.3390/metabo5010003 · Cited by 301
Metadata
- Authors
- Fuchs, P., Loeseken, C., Schubert, J. K., & Miekisch, W.
- Venue
- International Journal of Cancer
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2010-03-23
- Volume
- 126
- Issue
- 11
- Pages
- 2663-2670
- ISSN
- 0020-7136 (ISSN-L)
- 1097-0215
- OpenAlex
- W2009081566
- Cited by
- 513
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 7.38
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Breath gas aldehydes as biomarkers of lung cancer. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1002/ijc.24970
- The paper
- Fuchs, P., Loeseken, C., Schubert, J. K., & Miekisch, W. (2010). Breath gas aldehydes as biomarkers of lung cancer. International Journal of Cancer. https://doi.org/10.1002/ijc.24970
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.