Cited by 25Angiogenesis and VEGF in CancerLymphatic System and DiseasesCancer Cells and Metastasis

G‐CSF rescues tumor growth and neo‐angiogenesis during liver metastasis under host angiopoietin‐2 deficiency

Open access
Im, Jae Hong, Tapmeier, Thomas, Balathasan, Lukxmi, Gal, Annamaria, Yameen, Sabira, Hill, Sally, Smart, Sean, Noterdaeme, Olivier +7 more·2013·International Journal of Cancer

Abstract

Suppression of neo‐angiogenesis is a clinically used anti‐tumor strategy with new targets such as angiopoietin‐2 (Ang2) being proposed. However, the functions of Ang2 in vascular remodeling, inflammation and tumor growth are not consistent. We examined effect of depletion of host Ang2 on liver colony formation using Ang2 deficient (Ang2−/−) mice. Surprisingly, the metastatic colonies formed in Ang2−/− mice were larger than those in the wild type. These colonies had greater vascular density with more pericyte coverage than the vessels in liver colonies in the wild type. Liver VEGF concentration in both genotypes was equivalent, and thus, the differences appeared VEGF independent. However, after colony formation, the serum concentration of granulocyte‐colony stimulating factor (G‐CSF) and CXCL1 in Ang2−/− mice was 12 and 6 times greater than after colony formation in wild type. Increase of these two cytokines was associated with two times greater numbers of neutrophils recruited to the liver. Two times more Tie2+/CD11b+/CD31− cells were present in the tumors in Ang2−/− than in the wild type livers. These results suggest that the depletion of host Ang2 induced compensatory VEGF‐independent angiogenic mechanisms and thus enhanced liver metastatic colony growth and colony vascularity. They further indicate organotypic differences in response to tumor metastasis. In contrast, Ang2 deficiency inhibited tumor growth during metastatic colony formation in the lung, consistent with the reports of decreased pulmonary seeding of tumor cells after pharmacological inhibition of Ang2. Further studies are thus required to assess the effects of pharmacological Ang2 blockade for cancer patients particularly in the liver.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1002/ijc.27677

Cites

51 of 51 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Im, J. H., Tapmeier, T., Balathasan, L., Gal, A., Yameen, S., Hill, S., Smart, S., Noterdaeme, O., Kelly, M., Brady, M., Fu, W., Kruse, K., Bernhard, E. J., Augustin, H. G., & Muschel, R. J.
Affiliations
  • University of Oxford (GB)
  • GlaxoSmithKline (United States) (US)
  • German Cancer Research Center (DE)
Corresponding author
Muschel, Ruth J.
Venue
International Journal of Cancer
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2012-07-03
Volume
132
Issue
2
Pages
315-326
ISSN
  • 0020-7136 (ISSN-L)
  • 1097-0215
OpenAlex
W1969172409
Cited by
25
References
51
Citations by year
2024: 1 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 3 · 2020: 1 · 2019: 2 · 2018: 2 · 2017: 3 · 2016: 4 · 2015: 2 · 2014: 2 · 2013: 1
FWCI
0.64
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • International Journal of Cancer (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • University of Brighton Repository (University of Brighton) (submittedVersion)
  • University of Bedfordshire Repository (University of Bedfordshire) (submittedVersion)
Funders
  • Cancer Research UK (16466, 11563)
  • Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft (Project C3)
  • Aventis Foundation
  • Engineering and Physical Sciences Research Council
  • Oxford Cancer Imaging Centre
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Angiogenesis and VEGF in Cancer
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Oncology › Lymphatic System and Diseases
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Oncology › Cancer Cells and Metastasis
Keywords
angiopoietin-2, liver metastasis, granulocyte colony-stimulating factor, tumor angiogenesis, VEGF-independent angiogenesis, CXCL1, neutrophil recruitment, pericytes, tumor vascularity, lung metastasis, anti-angiogenic therapy
MeSH terms
Adenocarcinoma, Animals, Capillary Permeability, Female, Liver, Liver Neoplasms, Mice, Inbred C57BL, Neoplasm Transplantation, Neoplasms, Experimental, Neovascularization, Pathologic, Neutrophils, Granulocyte Colony-Stimulating Factor, Cytokines, Mice, Knockout, Statistics, Nonparametric, Platelet Endothelial Cell Adhesion Molecule-1, Receptor Protein-Tyrosine Kinases, CD11b Antigen, Vascular Endothelial Growth Factor A, Angiopoietin-2, Receptor, TIE-2, Cell Line, Tumor, Cell Proliferation, Green Fluorescent Proteins, Mice

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review