Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 161

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 7 of the 7 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

The lymphocyte/monocyte ratio predicts poor clinical outcome and improves the predictive accuracy in patients with soft tissue sarcomas: Lymphocyte/monocyte ratio and clinical outcome in soft tissue sarcoma patients

Szkandera, Joanna, Gerger, Armin, Liegl-Atzwanger, Bernadette, Absenger, Gudrun, Stotz, Michael, Friesenbichler, Joerg, Trajanoski, Slave, Stojakovic, Tatjana, Eberhard, Katharina, Leithner, Andreas, Pichler, Martin·2014·International Journal of Cancer

Abstract

Increasing evidence indicates the involvement of inflammation and coagulation in cancer progression and metastases. Inflammatory biomarkers hold great promise for improving the predictive ability of existing prognostic tools in cancer patients. In the present study, we investigated several inflammatory indices with regard to their prognostic relevance for predicting clinical outcome in soft tissue sarcoma (STS) patients. Three hundred and forty STS patients were divided into a training set (n = 170) and a validation set (n = 170). Besides well-established clinico-pathological prognostic factors, we evaluated the prognostic value of the neutrophil/lymphocyte (N/L) ratio, the lymphocyte/monocyte (L/M) ratio and the platelet/lymphocyte (P/L) ratio using Kaplan-Meier curves and univariate as well as multivariate Cox regression models. Additionally, we developed a nomogram by supplementing the L/M ratio to the well-established Kattan nomogram and evaluated the predictive accuracy of this novel nomogram by applying calibration and Harrell's concordance index (c-index). In multivariate analysis, a low L/M ratio was significantly associated with decreased CSS and DFS (HR = 0.41, 95% CI = 0.18-0.97, p = 0.043; HR = 0.39, 95% CI = 0.16-0.91, p = 0.031, respectively) in the training set. Using the validation set for confirmation, we found also in multivariate analysis an independent value for CSS (HR = 0.33, 95% CI = 0.12-0.90, p = 0.03) and for DFS (HR = 0.36, 95% CI = 0.16-0.79, p = 0.01). The estimated c-index was 0.74 using the original Kattan nomogram and 0.78 when the L/M ratio was added. Our study reports for the first time that the pre-operative L/M ratio represents a novel independent prognostic factor for prediction the clinical outcome in STS patients. This easily determinable biomarker might be helpful in improved individual risk assessment.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1002/ijc.28677

Cites

7 of 7 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 7 references

Cited by

See all 161

Metadata

Authors
Szkandera, J., Gerger, A., Liegl-Atzwanger, B., Absenger, G., Stotz, M., Friesenbichler, J., Trajanoski, S., Stojakovic, T., Eberhard, K., Leithner, A., & Pichler, M.
Venue
International Journal of Cancer
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2014-01-10
Volume
135
Issue
2
Pages
362-370
ISSN
0020-7136 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2155668225
Cited by
161
References
7
FWCI
8.85
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: The lymphocyte/monocyte ratio predicts poor clinical outcome and improves the predictive accuracy in patients with soft tissue sarcomas: Lymphocyte/monocyte ratio and clinical outcome in soft tissue sarcoma patients. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1002/ijc.28677
The paper
Szkandera, J., Gerger, A., Liegl-Atzwanger, B., Absenger, G., Stotz, M., Friesenbichler, J., Trajanoski, S., Stojakovic, T., Eberhard, K., Leithner, A., & Pichler, M. (2014). The lymphocyte/monocyte ratio predicts poor clinical outcome and improves the predictive accuracy in patients with soft tissue sarcomas: Lymphocyte/monocyte ratio and clinical outcome in soft tissue sarcoma patients. International Journal of Cancer. https://doi.org/10.1002/ijc.28677

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.