Genome‐wide small noncoding RNA profiling of pediatric high‐grade gliomas reveals deregulation of several mi RNA s, identifies downregulation of sno RNA cluster HBII‐52 and delineates H3F3A and TP53 mutant‐specific mi RNA s and sno RNA s
Abstract
Pediatric high‐grade gliomas (HGGs) are highly malignant tumors that remain incurable and relatively understudied. The crucial role of noncoding RNAs (ncRNAs) has been reported in various cancers. However, the study on miRNAs in pediatric HGGs is scant and there is no report till date on the status of other small ncRNAs. Genome‐wide microarray analysis was performed to investigate small ncRNA expression in pediatric HGG (n = 14) and compared to adult glioblastoma (GBM) signature. The validation of miRNAs and small nucleolar RNAs (snoRNAs) was done by real‐time polymerase chain reaction. TP53 and H3F3A mutation‐specific miRNA and snoRNA profiles were generated and analyzed. Pediatric HGGs showed upregulation of miR‐17/92 and its paralog clusters (miR106b/25 and miR‐106a/363), whereas majority of downregulated miRNAs belonged to miR379/656 cluster (14q32). Unsupervised hierarchical clustering identified two distinct groups. Interestingly, Group 2 with downregulated 14q32 cluster showed better overall survival. The miRNAs unique to pediatric HGG as compared to adult GBM were predicted to affect PDGFR and SMAD2/3 pathways. Similarities were seen between pediatric HGG and TP53 mutant miRNA profiles as compared to wild types. Several of H3F3A mutation‐regulated genes were found to be the targets of H3F3A mutant‐specific miRNAs. Remarkably, a significant downregulation of HBII‐52 snoRNA cluster was found in pediatric HGGs, and was specific to H3F3A nonmutants. This is the first genome‐wide profiling study on miRNAs and snoRNAs in pediatric HGGs with respect to H3F3A and TP53 mutations. The comparison of miRNA profiles of pediatric HGGs and adult GBM reiterates the overlaps and differences as also seen with their gene expression and methylation signatures.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In meningioma samples, members of the SNORD115 cluster have not been identified as up-regulated, supporting their exclusive neuronal origin.
“Interestingly, in meningioma samples – members of SNORD115 cluster have not been identified as up-regulated, supporting their exclusive neuronal origin (Jha et al., 2015; Rynkeviciene et al., 2018).”
From Small nucleolar RNAs in plasma extracellular vesicles and their discriminatory power as diagnostic biomarkers of Alzheimer's disease (2021) · cites this paper as Jha et al., 2015
Cites
Small nucleolar RNA signatures as biomarkers for non-small-cell lung cancer
Liao, J., Yu, L., Mei, Y., Guarnera, M., Shen, J., Li, R., Liu, Z., & Jiang, F. (2010) · Molecular Cancer · doi:10.1186/1476-4598-9-198 · Cited by 293 · see citing works
Skalsky, R. L., & Cullen, B. R. (2011) · PLoS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0024248 · Cited by 170 · see citing works
Ronchetti, D., Todoerti, K., Tuana, G., Agnelli, L., Mosca, L., Lionetti, M., Fabris, S., Colapietro, P., Miozzo, M., Ferrarini, M., et al. (2012) · Blood Cancer Journal · doi:10.1038/bcj.2012.41 · Cited by 79 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
New frontiers in translational control of the cancer genome
Truitt, M. L., & Ruggero, D. (2016) · Nature Reviews Cancer · doi:10.1038/nrc.2016.27 · Cited by 378 · see citing works
Fitz, N. F., Wang, J., Kamboh, M. I., Koldamova, R., & Lefterov, I. (2021) · Neurobiology of Disease · doi:10.1016/j.nbd.2021.105481 · Cited by 49 · see citing works
“Interestingly, in meningioma samples – members of SNORD115 cluster have not been identified as up-regulated, supporting their exclusive neuronal origin (Jha et al., 2015; Rynkeviciene et al., 2018).”
- Authors
- Jha, P., Agrawal, R., Pathak, P., Kumar, A., Purkait, S., Mallik, S., Suri, V., Chand Sharma, M., Gupta, D., Suri, A., Sharma, B. S., Julka, P. K., Kulshreshtha, R., & Sarkar, C.
- Affiliations
- Indian Institute of Technology Delhi (IN)
- All India Institute of Medical Sciences (IN)
- DR. B.R.A. Institute Rotary Cancer Hospital (IN)
- Department of Pathology All India Institute of Medical Sciences New Delhi India
- Corresponding author
- Kulshreshtha, Ritu
- Sarkar, Chitra
- ORCID
- Venue
- International Journal of Cancer
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2015-06-03
- Volume
- 137
- Issue
- 10
- Pages
- 2343-2353
- ISSN
- 0020-7136 (ISSN-L)
- 1097-0215
- OpenAlex
- W1885073966
- Cited by
- 44
- References
- 3
- Citations by year
- 2026: 2 · 2025: 4 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 6 · 2020: 4 · 2019: 6 · 2018: 4 · 2017: 8 · 2016: 3 · 2015: 2
- FWCI
- 1.87
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- International Journal of Cancer (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Funders
- DST (SB/YS/LS-362/2013)
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Cancer Research › MicroRNA in disease regulation
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Cancer Research › Cancer-related molecular mechanisms research
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Genetics › Glioma Diagnosis and Treatment
- Keywords
- pediatric high-grade glioma, miRNA expression profiling, small RNA, small nucleolar RNA, H3F3A mutation, TP53 mutation, miR-17-92 cluster, 14q32, Smad2/3 signaling, overall survival, tumor subtypes
- MeSH terms
- Adolescent, Adult, Brain Neoplasms, Child, Child, Preschool, Glioma, Histones, Humans, Mutation, Gene Expression Regulation, Neoplastic, Survival Analysis, Tumor Suppressor Protein p53, RNA, Small Nucleolar, Gene Expression Profiling, MicroRNAs
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review