Cited by 669Maternal and fetal healthcarePregnancy and preeclampsia studiesUterine Myomas and Treatments

FIGO classification for the clinical diagnosis of placenta accreta spectrum disorders,

Open access
Jauniaux, Eric, Ayres‐de‐Campos, Diogo, Langhoff‐Roos, Jens, Fox, Karin A., Collins, Sally, FIGO Placenta Accreta Diagnosis and Management Expert Consensus Panel·2019·International Journal of Gynecology & Obstetrics

Abstract

Placenta accreta spectrum is impacting maternal health outcomes globally and its prevalence is likely to increase. Maternal outcomes depend on identification of the condition before or during delivery and, in particular, on the differential diagnosis between its adherent and invasive forms. However, accurate estimation of its prevalence and outcome is currently problematic because of the varying use of clinical criteria to define it at birth and the lack of detailed pathologic examination in most series. Adherence to this new International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics ( FIGO ) classification should improve future systematic reviews and meta‐analyses and provide more accurate epidemiologic data which are essential to develop new management strategies.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1002/ijgo.12761

Cites

22 of 22 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Jauniaux, E., Ayres‐de‐Campos, D., Langhoff‐Roos, J., Fox, K. A., Collins, S., & Panel, F. P. A. D. A. M. E. C.
Affiliations
  • University College London (GB)
  • University of Lisbon (PT)
  • University of Copenhagen (DK)
  • Baylor College of Medicine (US)
  • John Radcliffe Hospital (GB)
Corresponding author
Jauniaux, Eric
Venue
International Journal of Gynecology & Obstetrics
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2019-06-07
Volume
146
Issue
1
Pages
20-24
ISSN
  • 0020-6695 (ISSN-L)
  • 0020-7292
  • 1879-3479
OpenAlex
W2953060245
Cited by
668
References
22
Citations by year
2026: 106 · 2025: 109 · 2024: 126 · 2023: 112 · 2022: 88 · 2021: 77 · 2020: 38 · 2019: 11 · 2014: 1
FWCI
55.76
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • International Journal of Gynecology & Obstetrics (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Digital Access to Libraries (Université catholique de Louvain (UCL), l'Université de Namur (UNamur) and the Université Saint-Louis (USL-B)) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
  • UCL Discovery (University College London) (submittedVersion)
  • Portuguese National Funding Agency for Science, Research and Technology (RCAAP Project by FCT) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health › Maternal and fetal healthcare
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Obstetrics and Gynecology › Pregnancy and preeclampsia studies
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Obstetrics and Gynecology › Uterine Myomas and Treatments
Keywords
placenta accreta spectrum, FIGO classification, placenta accreta, placenta increta, placenta percreta, diagnosis, differential diagnosis, maternal morbidity, prevalence
MeSH terms
Adult, Female, Humans, Placenta Accreta, Pregnancy, Perinatal Care, Delivery, Obstetric

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review