Cited by 22Gestational Diabetes Research and ManagementDiabetes Management and ResearchDiabetes, Cardiovascular Risks, and Lipoproteins

Towards a global consensus on GDM diagnosis: Light at the end of the tunnel?

Open access
Kapur, Anil, McIntyre, H. David, Divakar, Hema, Di Renzo, Gian Carlo, Kihara, Anne Beatrice, McAuliffe, Fionnuala, Hanson, Mark, Ma, Ronald C. +2 more·2020·International Journal of Gynecology & Obstetrics

Abstract

The diagnostic criteria for GDM continue to be debated. The arguments presented here may help to dissipate confusion and help build global consensus.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1002/ijgo.13149

Cites

42 of 42 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

1 of the 43 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. International Diabetes Federation IDF Diabetes Atlas 7th Edition. http://www.diabe tesat las.org/. Accessed March 10, 2020.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Kapur, A., McIntyre, H. D., Divakar, H., Di Renzo, G. C., Kihara, A. B., McAuliffe, F., Hanson, M., Ma, R. C., Hod, M., & FIGO Working Group on Hyperglycemia in Pregnancy
Affiliations
  • World Diabetes Foundation (DK)
  • Mater Health and Mater Research University of Queensland Brisbane Australia
  • Divakars Speciality Hospital Bangalore India
  • Center of Perinatal and Reproductive Medicine Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology University of Perugia Italy
  • University of Nairobi (KE)
  • National Maternity Hospital (IE)
  • University of Southampton (GB)
  • Department of Medicine and Therapeutics The Prince of Wales Hospital The Chinese University of Hong Kong China
  • Rabin Medical Center (IL)
  • International Federation of Gynaecology and Obstetrics (GB)
Corresponding author
Hod, Moshe
Venue
International Journal of Gynecology & Obstetrics
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2020-04-25
Volume
149
Issue
3
Pages
257-261
ISSN
  • 0020-6695 (ISSN-L)
  • 0020-7292
  • 1879-3479
OpenAlex
W3020215275
Cited by
22
References
43
Citations by year
2025: 1 · 2024: 6 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 5 · 2021: 3 · 2020: 4
FWCI
2.29
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • International Journal of Gynecology & Obstetrics (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • ePrints Soton (University of Southampton) (acceptedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Obstetrics and Gynecology › Gestational Diabetes Research and Management
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism › Diabetes Management and Research
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism › Diabetes, Cardiovascular Risks, and Lipoproteins
Keywords
gestational diabetes mellitus, diagnostic criteria, international consensus, diagnostic thresholds

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review