The DOI matches its Crossref record; 152 of the 152 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Personality and gender differences in global perspective
Open accessAbstract
Men's and women's personalities appear to differ in several respects. Social role theories of development assume gender differences result primarily from perceived gender roles, gender socialization and sociostructural power differentials. As a consequence, social role theorists expect gender differences in personality to be smaller in cultures with more gender egalitarianism. Several large cross‐cultural studies have generated sufficient data for evaluating these global personality predictions. Empirically, evidence suggests gender differences in most aspects of personality—Big Five traits, Dark Triad traits, self‐esteem, subjective well‐being, depression and values—are conspicuously larger in cultures with more egalitarian gender roles, gender socialization and sociopolitical gender equity. Similar patterns are evident when examining objectively measured attributes such as tested cognitive abilities and physical traits such as height and blood pressure. Social role theory appears inadequate for explaining some of the observed cultural variations in men's and women's personalities. Evolutionary theories regarding ecologically‐evoked gender differences are described that may prove more useful in explaining global variation in human personality.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Statistical Power Analysis for the Behavioral Sciences
Muller, K. (1989) · Technometrics · doi:10.1080/00401706.1989.10488618 · Cited by 99,167
Statistical Power Analysis for the Behavioral Sciences (2nd ed.).
Lachenbruch, P. A., & Cohen, J. (1989) · Journal of the American Statistical Association · doi:10.2307/2290095 · Cited by 37,395
The descent of man and selection in relation to sex
(1907) · The Journal of the Anthropological Society of Tokyo · doi:10.1537/ase1887.22.495 · Cited by 10,892
Modernization and Postmodernization: Cultural, Economic, and Political Change in 43 Societies
Inglehart, R. (1997) · doi:10.1515/9780691214429 · Cited by 5,392
Modernization and Postmodernization: Cultural, Economic, and Political Change in 43 Societies
Fukuyama, F., & Inglehart, R. (1997) · Foreign Affairs · doi:10.2307/20048045 · Cited by 4,803
The Psychological Foundations of Culture
Tooby, J., & Cosmides, L. (1992) · The Adapted Mind · doi:10.1093/oso/9780195060232.003.0002 · Cited by 3,627
Social Dominance: An Intergroup Theory of Social Hierarchy and Oppression
Sidanius, J., & Pratto, F. (1999) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/cbo9781139175043 · Cited by 3,597
Social dominance: an intergroup theory of social hierarchy and oppression
(2000) · Choice Reviews Online · doi:10.5860/choice.37-3413 · Cited by 3,376
Sex Differences in Social Behavior: A Social-role interpretation
Eagly, A. H. (2013) · Psychology Press eBooks · doi:10.4324/9780203781906 · Cited by 3,320
Sex Differences in Social Behavior: A Social-Role Interpretation.
Doherty, E. G., & Eagly, A. H. (1989) · Contemporary Sociology · doi:10.2307/2073813 · Cited by 3,266
Cited by
Mate Preferences and Their Behavioral Manifestations
Buss, D. M., & Schmitt, D. P. (2019) · Annual Review of Psychology · doi:10.1146/annurev-psych-010418-103408 · Cited by 503
Self-citationGender stereotypes can explain the gender-equality paradox
Breda, T., Jouini, E., Napp, C., & Thebault, G. (2020) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.2008704117 · Cited by 233
Mac Giolla, E., & Kajonius, P. J. (2019) · International Journal of Psychology · doi:10.1002/ijop.12529 · Cited by 217
Kuśnierz, C., Rogowska, A. M., & Pavlova, I. (2020) · International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health · doi:10.3390/ijerph17165729 · Cited by 100
Fors Connolly, F., Goossen, M., & Hjerm, M. (2020) · Sex Roles · doi:10.1007/s11199-019-01097-x · Cited by 65
Metadata
- Authors
- Schmitt, D. P., Long, A. E., McPhearson, A., O'Brien, K., Remmert, B., & Shah, S. H.
- Venue
- International Journal of Psychology
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2016-03-21
- Volume
- 52
- Issue
- S1
- Pages
- 45-56
- ISSN
- 0020-7594 (ISSN-L)
- 1464-066X
- OpenAlex
- W2308704067
- Cited by
- 369
- References
- 152
- FWCI
- 17.91
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Personality and gender differences in global perspective. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1002/ijop.12265
- The paper
- Schmitt, D. P., Long, A. E., McPhearson, A., O'Brien, K., Remmert, B., & Shah, S. H. (2017). Personality and gender differences in global perspective. International Journal of Psychology. https://doi.org/10.1002/ijop.12265
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.