Cited by 67Maternal Mental Health During Pregnancy and PostpartumSubstance Abuse Treatment and OutcomesChild Welfare and Adoption

PROMOTING SUPPORTIVE PARENTING IN NEW MOTHERS WITH SUBSTANCE-USE PROBLEMS: A PILOT RANDOMIZED TRIAL OF RESIDENTIAL TREATMENT PLUS AN ATTACHMENT-BASED PARENTING PROGRAM: Residential Treatment and Attachment

Open access
Berlin, Lisa J., Shanahan, Meghan, Appleyard Carmody, Karen·2014·Infant Mental Health Journal

Abstract

This pilot randomized trial tested the feasibility and efficacy of supplementing residential substance-abuse treatment for new mothers with a brief, yet rigorous, attachment-based parenting program. Twenty-one predominantly (86%) White mothers and their infants living together in residential substance-abuse treatment were randomly assigned to the program (n = 11) or control (n = 10) group. Program mothers received 10 home-based sessions of Dozier's Attachment and Biobehavioral Catch-up (ABC) intervention. Postintervention observations revealed more supportive parenting behaviors among the randomly assigned ABC mothers.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1002/imhj.21427

Cites

19 of 19 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Few of the EBPs potentially promising for mothers with SUDs have been successfully integrated into systems serving families with infants and young children.

    “Of this handful of EBPs that are potentially promising for mothers with SUDs, few have been successfully integrated into systems serving families with infants and young children (Berlin et al., 2014; Paris et al., 2015; Suchman, DeCoste, et al., 2017)”

    From Home‐based family recovery supports: Feasibility, acceptability, and adoption of training home visitors in “Mothering from the Inside Out” (2025) · cites this paper as Berlin et al., 2014

    The paper says attachment-focused care was typically absent from residential treatment and describes its own integration of an established program as a preliminary pilot (Discussion; page unavailable). It does not establish that few promising evidence-based programs have been successfully integrated across systems serving families with infants and young children; it says integration of substance-use and parenting services was becoming more prevalent (opening section labeled Abstract in our copy; page unavailable). (LLM, conf=0.85)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • An RCT involving mothers with substance abuse found that ABC mothers were more sensitive than controls (d=.67).

    “Results from an RCT with substance abusing mothers found that mothers who received ABC demonstrated greater sensitivity than mothers in a control condition of the same length that inquired about mother-child wellbeing and provided age-appropriate books (d = .67; Berlin, Shanahan, & Appleyard Carmody, 2014).”

    From Relational Interventions for Maltreated Children (2017) · cites this paper as Berlin, Shanahan, & Appleyard Carmody, 2014

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

1 of the 20 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. Bernstein DP Fink L 1998 CTQ Childhood Trauma Questionnaire: A retrospective self-report manual San Antonio, TX NCS Pearson

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Berlin, L. J., Shanahan, M., & Appleyard Carmody, K.
Affiliations
  • University of Maryland, College Park (US)
  • University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill (US)
  • Duke University
Corresponding author
Berlin, Lisa J.
Venue
Infant Mental Health Journal
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2013-12-09
Volume
35
Issue
1
Pages
81-85
ISSN
0163-9641 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W1519741888
Cited by
67
References
20
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 1 · 2024: 5 · 2023: 9 · 2022: 6 · 2021: 5 · 2020: 7 · 2019: 3 · 2018: 7 · 2017: 8 · 2016: 9 · 2015: 4 · 2014: 2
FWCI
5.10
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Infant Mental Health Journal (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
Funders
  • National Institutes of Health (5p20da017589-05)
  • National Institute of Mental Health (K01MH70378, K01MH070378)
  • National Institute on Drug Abuse (P20- DA017589, P30DA023026)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Maternal Mental Health During Pregnancy and Postpartum
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Epidemiology › Substance Abuse Treatment and Outcomes
  • Social Sciences › Safety Research › Child Welfare and Adoption
Keywords
Attachment and Biobehavioral Catch-up, maternal substance use, postpartum women, residential addiction treatment, supportive parenting, infant development, home-based intervention, feasibility
MeSH terms
Adult, Education, Nonprofessional, Feasibility Studies, Female, Humans, Infant, Male, Mothers, Pilot Projects, Psychiatric Status Rating Scales, Surveys and Questionnaires, Residential Treatment, Parenting, Treatment Outcome, Substance-Related Disorders, Young Adult

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review