Cited by 53Mindfulness and Compassion InterventionsSubstance Abuse Treatment and OutcomesOpioid Use Disorder Treatment

Impact of Mindfulness-Based Parenting on Women in Treatment for Opioid Use Disorder

Gannon, Meghan, Mackenzie, Michael, Kaltenbach, Karol, Abatemarco, Diane·2017·Journal of Addiction Medicine

Abstract

Objectives: Mothers with opioid use disorder are at high risk for maladaptive parenting. The present observational study aimed to measure the impact of a trauma-informed mindfulness-based parenting (MBP) intervention on quality of parenting behaviors of mothers primarily with opioid use disorders as well as examine associations between exposure to adverse childhood experiences and self-reported mindful parenting. Methods: A pretest posttest design was used with repeated measures. A total of 160 women were recruited from a substance use treatment program into the 12-week-long group-based intervention comprised didactic and experiential mindfulness activities. The Keys to Interactive Parenting Scale (KIPS) measured quality of parenting behavior, the Adverse Childhood Experiences Tool captured history of exposure to childhood trauma, and the Interpersonal Mindfulness in Parenting (IM-P) scale measured the degree of mindful parenting. Analyses were conducted using multilevel modeling. Results: The MBP intervention resulted in clinically significant improvements in KIPS total and all subscale scores and an IM-P total score. Data showed higher baseline Adverse Childhood Experiences and higher program attendance significantly predicted improved overall quality of parenting behaviors at a greater rate over time. Higher IM-P scores were associated with greater rate of improvement in KIPS total and all subscale scores. Conclusions: Study findings suggest a trauma-informed MBP intervention for parenting women with opioid use disorders is associated with significant clinical improvements in quality of parenting behavior. Results of this model show promise in supporting parenting of mothers receiving treatment for opioid use disorders to enhance bonding and parenting.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1097/adm.0000000000000336

Cites

41 of 41 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Gannon, M., Mackenzie, M., Kaltenbach, K., & Abatemarco, D.
Affiliations
Thomas Jefferson University (US)
Corresponding author
Gannon, Meghan
Venue
Journal of Addiction Medicine
Published
2017-09
Volume
11
Issue
5
Pages
368-376
ISSN
  • 1932-0620 (ISSN-L)
  • 1935-3227
OpenAlex
W2737083174
Cited by
53
References
41
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 7 · 2023: 10 · 2022: 6 · 2021: 11 · 2020: 4 · 2019: 7 · 2018: 3 · 2017: 1
FWCI
5.09
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Journal of Addiction Medicine (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Mindfulness and Compassion Interventions
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Epidemiology › Substance Abuse Treatment and Outcomes
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Opioid Use Disorder Treatment
Keywords
opioid use disorder, mothers, parenting quality, adverse childhood experiences, trauma-informed interventions, addiction treatment, maternal substance use
MeSH terms
Adult Survivors of Child Adverse Events, Adult, Child, Preschool, Female, Humans, Infant, Mothers, Opioid-Related Disorders, Parenting, Outcome Assessment, Health Care, Young Adult, Mindfulness

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review