Cited by 194Alzheimer's disease research and treatmentsMicrotubule and mitosis dynamicsCancer Treatment and Pharmacology

Microtubule bundling by tau proteins in vivo: analysis of functional domains

Open access
Kanai, Y., Chen, J., Hirokawa, N.·1992·The EMBO Journal

Abstract

Tau varies both in the N-terminal region (three types) and in the C-terminal repeated microtubule binding domain (two types), generating six isoforms through alternative splicing. To understand the differences between the isoforms and to determine which domains are important for microtubule bundling, we performed transfection studies on fibroblasts using tau isoforms and deletion mutants to quantify their ability to bundle microtubules. By comparing the isoforms, we found that a longer N-terminal region induced microtubule bundling more efficiently, but changes in the microtubule binding domain did not. Mutants lacking the proline rich region or the repeated domain did not bind to microtubules. Although all the other mutants could bind to and bundle microtubules, deletion in the N-terminal neutral region or the first half of the C-terminal tail caused a significant decrease in microtubule bundling, indicating the importance of these regions in microtubule bundling.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1002/j.1460-2075.1992.tb05489.x

Cites

4 of 4 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 9

  1. De Brabander,M., Geuens,G., Nuydens,R., Willebrords,R. and de Mey,J. (1981) Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA, 78, 5608-5612.
  2. Goedert,M., Wischik,C.M., Crowther,R.A., Walker,J.E. and Klug,A. (1988) Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA, 85, 4051-5055.
  3. Grundke-Iqbal,I., Iqbal,K., Tung,Y., Quinlan,M., Wisniewski,H.M. and Binder,L.I. (1986b) Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA, 83, 4913-4917.
  4. Hirokawa,N. (1991) In Burgoyne,R.D. (eds), Neuronal Cytoskeleton. Wiley Liss, New York, pp. 5-74.
  5. Kosik,K.S., Joachim,C.L. and Selkoe,D.J. (1986) Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA, 83, 4044-4048.
  6. Murphy,D.B. and Borisy,G.G. (1975) Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA, 72, 2696-2700.
  7. Sloboda,R.D., Rudolph,S.A., Rosenbaum,J.L. and Greengard,P. (1975) Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA, 72, 177-181.
  8. Weingarten,M.D., Lockwood,A.H., Hwo,S.-Y. and Kirschner,M.W. (1975) Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA, 72, 1858-1862.
  9. Wood,J.G., Mirra,S.S., Pollock,N.J. and Binder,L.I. (1986) Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA, 83, 4040-4043.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Kanai, Y., Chen, J., & Hirokawa, N.
Affiliations
The University of Tokyo (JP)
Venue
The EMBO Journal
Published
1992-11-01
Volume
11
Issue
11
Pages
3953-3961
ISSN
  • 0261-4189 (ISSN-L)
  • 1460-2075
OpenAlex
W1685478544
Cited by
194
References
4
Citations by year
2026: 5 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 6 · 2021: 10 · 2020: 3 · 2019: 4 · 2018: 2 · 2017: 6 · 2016: 6 · 2015: 8 · 2014: 2 · 2013: 3 · 2012: 3
FWCI
8.98
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • The EMBO Journal (publishedVersion)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
Japan Society for the Promotion of Science
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology › Alzheimer's disease research and treatments
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Cell Biology › Microtubule and mitosis dynamics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Oncology › Cancer Treatment and Pharmacology
Keywords
tau protein, microtubule bundling, tau isoforms, alternative splicing, microtubule-binding domain, N-terminal domain, C-terminal tail, proline-rich region, functional domains, fibroblasts
MeSH terms
Animals, Antibodies, Monoclonal, Electrophoresis, Polyacrylamide Gel, Fluorescent Antibody Technique, L Cells, Microtubules, Terminator Regions, Genetic, Transfection, Immunoblotting, Mutagenesis, Site-Directed, tau Proteins, Sequence Deletion, Mice

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review