Cited by 400DNA Repair MechanismsUbiquitin and proteasome pathwaysNuclear Structure and Function

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 65 of the 70 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Purification and cloning of a nucleotide excision repair complex involving the xeroderma pigmentosum group C protein and a human homologue of yeast RAD23.

Open access
Masutani, C., Sugasawa, K., Yanagisawa, J., Sonoyama, T., Ui, M., Enomoto, T., Takio, K., Tanaka, K., van der Spek, P.J., Bootsma, D.·1994·The EMBO Journal

Abstract

Complementation group C of xeroderma pigmentosum (XP) represents one of the most common forms of this cancer-prone DNA repair syndrome. The primary defect is located in the subpathway of the nucleotide excision repair system, dealing with the removal of lesions from the non-transcribing sequences ('genome-overall' repair). Here we report the purification to homogeneity and subsequent cDNA cloning of a repair complex by in vitro complementation of the XP-C defect in a cell-free repair system containing UV-damaged SV40 minichromosomes. The complex has a high affinity for ssDNA and consists of two tightly associated proteins of 125 and 58 kDa. The 125 kDa subunit is an N-terminally extended version of previously reported XPCC gene product which is thought to represent the human homologue of the Saccharomyces cerevisiae repair gene RAD4. The 58 kDa species turned out to be a human homologue of yeast RAD23. Unexpectedly, a second human counterpart of RAD23 was identified. All RAD23 derivatives share a ubiquitin-like N-terminus. The nature of the XP-C defect implies that the complex exerts a unique function in the genome-overall repair pathway which is important for prevention of skin cancer.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1002/j.1460-2075.1994.tb06452.x

Cites

65 of 65 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 70 references

Research works printed but not linked: 7

  1. Bailly,V., Sommers,C.H., Sung,P., Prakash,L. and Prakash,S. (1992) Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA, 89, 8273 -8277.
  2. Baneri,J., Sands,J., Strominger,J.L. and Spies,T. (1990) Proc. NatlAcad. Sci. USA, 87, 2374-2378.
  3. Flejter,W.L., McDaniel,L.D., Johns,D., Friedberg,E.C. and Schultz,R.A. (1992) Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA, 89, 261 -265.
  4. Huang,J.-C., Svoboda,D.L., Reardon,J.T. and Sancar,A. (1992) Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA, 89, 3664-3668.
  5. Koken,M.H.M., Reynolds,P., Jaspers-Dekker,I., Prakash,L., Prakash,S., Bootsma,D. and Hoeijmakers,J.H.J. (1991) Proc. NatlAcad. Sci. USA, 88, 8865-8869.
  6. Sanger,F., Nicklen,S. and Coulson,A.R. (1977) Proc. NatlAcad. Sci. USA, 74, 5463-5467.
  7. Toniolo,D., Persico,M. and Alcalay,M. (1988) Proc. NatlAcad. Sci. USA, 85, 851-855.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Items 101–200 of 400

Metadata

Authors
Masutani, C., Sugasawa, K., Yanagisawa, J., Sonoyama, T., Ui, M., Enomoto, T., Takio, K., Tanaka, K., van der Spek, P. J., & Bootsma, D.
Affiliations
RIKEN (JP)
Venue
The EMBO Journal
Published
1994-04-01
Volume
13
Issue
8
Pages
1831-1843
ISSN
  • 0261-4189 (ISSN-L)
  • 1460-2075
OpenAlex
W1005028082
Cited by
400
References
70
Citations by year
2026: 5 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 6 · 2023: 6 · 2022: 5 · 2021: 7 · 2020: 8 · 2019: 9 · 2018: 5 · 2017: 7 · 2016: 13 · 2015: 9 · 2014: 7 · 2013: 5 · 2012: 9
FWCI
9.75
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • The EMBO Journal (publishedVersion)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • EUR Research Repository (Erasmus University Rotterdam) (submittedVersion)
Funders
  • Cosmetology Research Foundation
  • RIKEN
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › DNA Repair Mechanisms
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Ubiquitin and proteasome pathways
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Nuclear Structure and Function
Keywords
xeroderma pigmentosum group C, nucleotide excision repair, Rad23, Rad4, UV-damaged DNA, single-stranded DNA binding, cDNA cloning, protein complex purification, skin cancer prevention, SV40 minichromosomes
MeSH terms
Amino Acid Sequence, Base Sequence, DNA Damage, DNA Repair, DNA-Binding Proteins, DNA, Viral, Fungal Proteins, HeLa Cells, Humans, Models, Molecular, Molecular Sequence Data, Transglutaminases, Simian virus 40, Ubiquitins, Ultraviolet Rays, Sequence Homology, Amino Acid, DNA, Complementary, Schizosaccharomyces pombe Proteins, DNA Repair Enzymes

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review