Cited by 39Nausea and vomiting managementSpaceflight effects on biologyVestibular and auditory disorders

Use of Promethazine to Hasten Adaptation to Provocative Motion

Lackner, James R., Graybiel, Ashton·1994·The Journal of Clinical Pharmacology

Abstract

In an earlier study, the authors found that severely motion sick individuals could be greatly relieved of their symptoms by intramuscular injections of promethazine (50 mg) or scopolamine (.5 mg). Comparable 50‐mg injections of promethazine also have been found effective in alleviating symptoms of space motion sickness. The concern has risen, however, that such drugs may delay or retard the acquisition of adaptation to stressful environments. In the current study, we controlled arousal using a mental arithmetic task and precisely equated the exposure history (number of head movements during rotation) of a placebo, control group and an experimental group who had received promethazine. No differences in total adaptation or in rates of adaptation were present between the two groups. Another experimental group also received promethazine and was allowed to make as many head movements as they could, before reaching nausea, up to 800. This group showed a greater level of adaptation than the placebo group. These results suggest a strategy for dealing with space motion sickness that is described.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1002/j.1552-4604.1994.tb02018.x

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Anti-motion sickness drugs potentially can enhance the rate of adaptation by allowing progressive exposure to higher levels of stimulation without symptoms being elicited.

    “Anti-motion sickness drugs potentially can enhance the rate of adaptation by allowing progressive exposure to higher levels of stimulation without symptoms being elicited (Cohen et al. 2008; Lackner and Graybiel 1994; Levine et al. 2000).”

    From Motion sickness: more than nausea and vomiting (2014) · cites this paper as Lackner and Graybiel 1994

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Lackner, J. R., & Graybiel, A.
Affiliations
Brandeis University (US)
Corresponding author
Lackner, James R.
Venue
The Journal of Clinical Pharmacology
Publisher
Wiley
Published
1994-06
Volume
34
Issue
6
Pages
644-648
ISSN
  • 0021-9754 (ISSN-L)
  • 0091-2700
  • 1552-4604
OpenAlex
W2040720170
Cited by
39
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 3 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 2 · 2019: 2 · 2018: 1 · 2017: 3 · 2016: 1 · 2014: 1 · 2013: 2 · 2012: 2
FWCI
0.43
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • The Journal of Clinical Pharmacology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Surgery › Nausea and vomiting management
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology › Spaceflight effects on biology
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Neurology › Vestibular and auditory disorders
Keywords
promethazine, motion sickness, space motion sickness, scopolamine, head rotation, nausea, mental arithmetic task
MeSH terms
Adaptation, Physiological, Adult, Arousal, Head, Humans, Male, Mental Processes, Motion Sickness, Movement, Promethazine, Rotation

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review