Cited by 115Posttraumatic Stress Disorder ResearchMigration, Health and TraumaMaternal Mental Health During Pregnancy and Postpartum

Effectiveness and specificity of a classroom‐based group intervention in children and adolescents exposed to war in Lebanon

Open access
KARAM, ELIE G., FAYYAD, JOHN, KARAM, AIMEE NASSER, TABET, CAROLINE CORDAHI, MELHEM, NADINE, MNEIMNEH, ZEINA, DIMASSI, HANI·2008·World Psychiatry

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to examine the effectiveness and specificity of a classroom-based psychosocial intervention after war. All students (n=2500) of six villages in Southern Lebanon designated as most heavily exposed to war received a classroom-based intervention delivered by teachers, consisting of cognitive-behavioural and stress inoculation training strategies. A random sample of treated students (n=101) and a matched control group (n=93) were assessed one month post-war and one year later. Mental disorders and psychosocial stressors were assessed using the Diagnostic Interview for Children and Adolescents - Revised with children and parents. War exposure was measured using the War Events Questionnaire. The prevalence of major depressive disorder (MDD), separation anxiety disorder (SAD) and post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD) was examined pre-war, one month post-war (pre-intervention), and one year post-war. Specificity of treatment was determined by rating teachers' therapy diaries. The rates of disorders peaked one month post-war and decreased over one year. There was no significant effect of the intervention on the rates of MDD, SAD or PTSD. Post-war MDD, SAD and PTSD were associated with pre-war SAD and PTSD, family violence parameters, financial problems and witnessing war events. These findings have significant policy and public health implications, given current practices of delivering universal interventions immediately post-war.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1002/j.2051-5545.2008.tb00170.x

Cites

49 of 49 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • A Lebanese cross-sectional follow-up found no positive effects for children in a school-based program that combined cognitive-behavioral strategies with drawing, creative play, and group discussion.

    “in a cross-sectional follow-up study comparing intervention participants to community controls in Lebanon, no positive effects were observed among children who received a school-based intervention combining cognitive-behavioral treatment strategies with activities like drawing, creative play, and group discussion.47”
  • In a Lebanon trial of a 12-session teacher-delivered classroom intervention for 6-18-year-olds in conflict-affected areas, depression, separation anxiety, and PTSD did not differ between study conditions.

    “In another trial of a classroom-based intervention (consisting of 12 daily sessions implemented by teachers) with 6–18-year-olds residing in armed conflict-affected areas in Lebanon, no differences in depression, separation anxiety, and PTSD between study conditions were recorded.”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 3

  1. Stein BD, Jaycox LH, Kataoka SH et al. A mental health interven- tion for school children exposed to violence; a randomized con- trolled trial. JAMA 2003;290:603-11.
  2. Karam EG, Al Atrash R, Saliba S et al. The War Events Question- naire. Soc Psychiatry Psychiatr Epidemiol 1999;34:265-74.
  3. Punamaki RL. Can ideological commitment protect children's psy- chological wellbeing in situations of political violence? Child De- velop 1996;67:55-69.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
KARAM, E. G., FAYYAD, J., KARAM, A. N., TABET, C. C., MELHEM, N., MNEIMNEH, Z., & DIMASSI, H.
Affiliations
  • University of Balamand (LB)
  • University of Pittsburgh (US)
  • University of Michigan (US)
  • Institute for Development, Research, Advocacy and Applied Care (LB)
Venue
World Psychiatry
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2008-06
Volume
7
Issue
2
Pages
103-109
ISSN
  • 1723-8617 (ISSN-L)
  • 2051-5545
OpenAlex
W1723388838
Cited by
115
References
49
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 5 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 6 · 2021: 2 · 2020: 8 · 2019: 3 · 2018: 2 · 2017: 41 · 2016: 3 · 2015: 3 · 2014: 7 · 2013: 7 · 2012: 4
FWCI
7.44
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • World Psychiatry (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Deep Blue (University of Michigan) (submittedVersion)
Funders
UNICEF
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Posttraumatic Stress Disorder Research
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Migration, Health and Trauma
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Maternal Mental Health During Pregnancy and Postpartum
Keywords
war exposure, post-war mental health, classroom intervention, teacher-delivered intervention, cognitive-behavioural intervention, stress inoculation training, major depressive disorder, separation anxiety disorder, post-traumatic stress disorder, children and adolescents, Lebanon, domestic violence, treatment specificity

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review