The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Counseling Uses of Career Self‐Efficacy Theory
Abstract
This article discusses the use of career self‐efficacy theory in counseling individuals having low career‐related self‐efficacy.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Protean and boundaryless careers: An empirical exploration
Briscoe, J. P., Hall, D. T., & Frautschy DeMuth, R. L. (2006) · Journal of Vocational Behavior · doi:10.1016/j.jvb.2005.09.003 · Cited by 1,041
Zeldin, A. L., & Pajares, F. (2000) · American Educational Research Journal · doi:10.2307/1163477 · Cited by 835
Zeldin, A. L., Britner, S. L., & Pajares, F. (2008) · Journal of Research in Science Teaching · doi:10.1002/tea.20195 · Cited by 497
Factors That Influence Persistence in Science and Engineering Career Aspirations
Mau, W. (2003) · The Career Development Quarterly · doi:10.1002/j.2161-0045.2003.tb00604.x · Cited by 340
Career Assessment and the Career Decision-Making Self-Efficacy Scale
Betz, N. E., & Luzzo, D. A. (1996) · Journal of Career Assessment · doi:10.1177/106907279600400405 · Cited by 334
Self-citation
Metadata
- Authors
- Betz, N. E.
- Venue
- The Career Development Quarterly
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 1992-09
- Volume
- 41
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 22-26
- ISSN
- 0889-4019 (ISSN-L)
- 2161-0045
- OpenAlex
- W2057145785
- Cited by
- 178
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 17.79
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Counseling Uses of Career Self‐Efficacy Theory. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1002/j.2161-0045.1992.tb00352.x
- The paper
- Betz, N. E. (1992). Counseling Uses of Career Self‐Efficacy Theory. The Career Development Quarterly. https://doi.org/10.1002/j.2161-0045.1992.tb00352.x
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
