Cited by 61

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Explaining Career Decision-Making Self-Efficacy: Personality, Cognitions, and Cultural Mistrust

Bullock‐Yowell, Emily, Andrews, Lindsay, Buzzetta, Mary E.·2011·The Career Development Quarterly

Abstract

The authors explore the hypothesis that career decision‐making self‐efficacy could be affected by negative career thoughts, Big Five personality factors, and cultural mistrust in a sample of African American and Caucasian college students. Findings demonstrated that negative career thinking, openness, and conscientiousness explained a significant amount of variance in career decision‐making self‐efficacy in a general sample of college students, but no unique variance was explained by cultural mistrust in a sample of African American college students.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1002/j.2161-0045.2011.tb00967.x

Cites

2 of 2 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Show all 2 references

Research works printed but not linked: 42

  1. 10.1177/1073191104269871 · DOI
  2. 10.1037/0033-295X.84.2.191 · DOI · Paper page
  3. 10.1002/j.2161-1912.2005.tb00004.x · DOI
  4. 10.1177/1069072707305759 · DOI
  5. 10.1177/106907279600400103 · DOI
  6. 10.1177/106907279600400405 · DOI
  7. 10.1177/106907279300100104 · DOI
  8. 10.1111/j.0022-3506.2004.00282.x · DOI
  9. Brown D., 2007, Career information, career counseling, and career development
  10. 10.1177/1069072706298020 · DOI
  11. 10.1177/089484530202800404 · DOI
  12. Cohen J., 1988, Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences
  13. Costa P. T., 1992, The NEO Personality Inventory (NEO PI‐R) and NEO Five‐Factor Inventory (NEO‐FFI) professional manual
  14. 10.1016/0001-8791(76)90012-9 · DOI
  15. 10.1002/j.2161-0045.2008.tb00040.x · DOI
  16. 10.1002/j.2161-0045.1999.tb00282.x · DOI
  17. 10.1177/0894845306293416 · DOI
  18. 10.1177/1069072706298011 · DOI
  19. Holland J. L., 1980, My Vocational Situation
  20. 10.1177/1069072704266673 · DOI
  21. Krumboltz J. D., 1991, Career Beliefs Inventory
  22. 10.1006/jvbe.1994.1027 · DOI · Paper page
  23. 10.1177/1094428105283193 · DOI
  24. 10.1037/0022-0167.40.2.194 · DOI
  25. Miller M. J., 2005, Career development and counseling: Putting theory and research to work, 441
  26. 10.1037/0022-0167.41.3.378 · DOI
  27. Osipow S. H., 1976, The Career Decision Scale
  28. Osipow S. H., 1987, The Career Decision Scale
  29. Robbins S. B., 1985, Validity estimates for the Career Decision‐Making Self‐Efficacy Scale, Measurement and Evaluation in Counseling and Development, 18, 64, 10.1080/07481756.1985.12022792 · DOI
  30. Rollins V. B., 2000, Perceived racism and career self‐efficacy in African‐American adolescents
  31. Sampson J. P., 1996, Career Thoughts Inventory: Professional manual
  32. 10.1177/106907279800600201 · DOI
  33. Sampson J. P., 2004, Career counseling & services: A cognitive information processing approach
  34. 10.1016/0001-8791(83)90006-4 · DOI
  35. 10.1016/0001-8791(90)90004-L · DOI · Paper page
  36. Terrell F., 1981, An inventory to measure cultural mistrust among Blacks, Western Journal of Black Studies, 3, 180
  37. 10.1007/BF02249424 · DOI
  38. 10.1006/jvbe.1998.1660 · DOI
  39. 10.1177/0011000001294003 · DOI
  40. 10.1037/0002-9432.71.2.252 · DOI
  41. 10.1002/jclp.1150 · DOI
  42. 10.1080/00223989809599170 · DOI

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Bullock‐Yowell, E., Andrews, L., & Buzzetta, M. E.
Venue
The Career Development Quarterly
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2011-09
Volume
59
Issue
5
Pages
400-411
ISSN
  • 0889-4019
  • 2161-0045
Cited by
61
References
2
Language
en

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review