Cited by 3,185Psychometric Methodologies and TestingPersonality Traits and PsychologyPsychological Testing and Assessment

The international personality item pool and the future of public-domain personality measures

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.jrp.2005.08.007

Cites

37 of 37 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The personality analysis is based on around 72 thousand participants with at least 1,000 words who took a Big Five questionnaire.

    “We created age and gender-adjusted word clouds for each personality factor based on around 72 thousand participants with at least 1,000 words across their Facebook status updates, who took a Big Five questionnaire [91].”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 10

  1. Ashton, M. C. (2005). How the IPIP benefits personality research and education. In L. R. Goldberg (Chair), The international personality item pool and the future of public-domain personality measures. Presidential symposium at the sixth annual meeting of the association for research in personality, New Orleans, January.
  2. Cloninger, C. R. (2005). Comments on Lew Goldberg’s IPIP. In L. R. Goldberg (Chair), The international personality item pool and the future of public-domain personality measures. Presidential symposium at the sixth annual meeting of the association for research in personality, New Orleans, January.
  3. Conn, S. R., & Rieke, M. L. (1994). The 16PF fifth edition technical manual. Champaign, IL: Institute for Personality and Ability Testing.
  4. Eber, H. (2005). IPIP: A milestone on the path to conceptual clarity. In L. R. Goldberg (Chair), The international personality item pool and the future of public-domain personality measures. Presidential symposium at the sixth annual meeting of the association for research in personality, New Orleans.
  5. Goldberg, L. R. (2005a). A scientific collaboratory for the development of advanced measures of personality traits and other individual differences. In L. R. Goldberg (Chair), The international personality item pool and the future of public-domain personality measures. Presidential symposium at the sixth annual meeting of the association for research in personality, New Orleans, January.
  6. Goldberg, 2005, The Eugene–Springfield community sample: Information available from the research participants, ORI Technical Report, 45
  7. Gough, H. G. (2005). Remarks for the ARP presidential symposium. In L. R. Goldberg (Chair), The international personality item pool and the future of public-domain personality measures. Presidential symposium at the sixth annual meeting of the association for research in personality, New Orleans, January.
  8. Hogan, R. (2005). On the IPIP. In L. R. Goldberg (Chair), The international personality item pool and the future of public-domain personality measures. Presidential symposium at the sixth annual meeting of the Association for Research in Personality, New Orleans, January.
  9. Johnson, J. A. (2005b). The good, the bad, and the ugly: The IPIP consultant’s experiences recounted. In L. R. Goldberg (Chair), The international personality item pool and the future of public-domain personality measures. Presidential symposium at the sixth annual meeting of the association for research in personality, New Orleans, January.
  10. Tellegen, A. (in press). MPQ (Multidimensional Personality Questionnaire): Manual for administration, scoring, and interpretation. Minneapolis, MN: University of Minnesota Press.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Goldberg, L. R., Johnson, J. A., Eber, H. W., Hogan, R., Ashton, M. C., Cloninger, C. R., & Gough, H. G.
Affiliations
  • Oregon Research Institute (US)
  • Pennsylvania State University (US)
  • Brock University (CA)
  • Washington University in St. Louis (US)
  • University of California, Berkeley (US)
Corresponding author
Johnson, John A.
Venue
Journal of Research in Personality
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2006-02
Volume
40
Issue
1
Pages
84-96
ISSN
0092-6566 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2136219431
Cited by
3,185
References
37
Citations by year
2026: 111 · 2025: 151 · 2024: 188 · 2023: 182 · 2022: 186 · 2021: 209 · 2020: 256 · 2019: 174 · 2018: 192 · 2017: 195 · 2016: 184 · 2015: 210 · 2014: 206 · 2013: 142 · 2012: 170
FWCI
51.36
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Journal of Research in Personality (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › Management Science and Operations Research › Psychometric Methodologies and Testing
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Personality Traits and Psychology
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Applied Psychology › Psychological Testing and Assessment
Keywords
International Personality Item Pool, personality assessment, cross-cultural translation, scoring keys

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review