Cited by 516Creativity in Education and NeurosciencePsychological Testing and AssessmentCognitive Abilities and Testing

Predictive Validity of the Torrance Tests of Creative Thinking*

TORRANCE, E. PAUL·1972·The Journal of Creative Behavior

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1002/j.2162-6057.1972.tb00936.x

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Torrance (1972, 1974) reported TTCT reliability coefficients of 0.82, 0.78, 0.51 and 0.78 for fluency, flexibility, originality and elaboration respectively, and 0.86 for the total test.

    “Regarding the estimation of reliability of TTCT test (Torrance, 1972(Torrance, , 1974) ) the reliability coefficients have been 0.82, 0.78, 0.51, and 0.78 for fluency, flexibility, originality and elaboration respectively.For the total test it has been 0.86.”
  • Torrance (1972) referred to content validity, concurrent validity, construct validity and predictive validity.

    “In a study Torrance (1972) has referred to content validity, concurrent validity, construct validity as well as predictive validity .”

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
TORRANCE, E. P.
Affiliations
University of Georgia (US)
Corresponding author
TORRANCE, E. PAUL
Venue
The Journal of Creative Behavior
Publisher
Wiley
Published
1972-12
Volume
6
Issue
4
Pages
236-262
ISSN
  • 0022-0175 (ISSN-L)
  • 2162-6057
OpenAlex
W2019443768
Cited by
516
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 16 · 2025: 36 · 2024: 39 · 2023: 53 · 2022: 32 · 2021: 38 · 2020: 34 · 2019: 35 · 2018: 18 · 2017: 19 · 2016: 18 · 2015: 8 · 2014: 18 · 2013: 12 · 2012: 10
FWCI
6.51
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
The Journal of Creative Behavior (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Creativity in Education and Neuroscience
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Applied Psychology › Psychological Testing and Assessment
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Cognitive Abilities and Testing
Keywords
Torrance Tests of Creative Thinking, predictive validity, creativity assessment, creative thinking, test validity

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review