Cited by 30Mindfulness and Compassion InterventionsEarly Childhood Education and DevelopmentStudent Stress and Coping

Exploring Mindfulness Benefits for Students and Teachers in Three German High Schools

Luong, Minh Tam, Gouda, Sarah, Bauer, Joachim, Schmidt, Stefan·2019·Mindfulness

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/s12671-019-01231-6

Cites

123 of 123 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

1 of the 124 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Luong, M. T., Gouda, S., Bauer, J., & Schmidt, S.
Affiliations
University of Freiburg (DE)
Corresponding author
Schmidt, Stefan
Venue
Mindfulness
Published
2019-11-11
Volume
10
Issue
12
Pages
2682-2702
ISSN
  • 1868-8527 (ISSN-L)
  • 1868-8535
OpenAlex
W2983777960
Cited by
30
References
124
Citations by year
2026: 5 · 2025: 7 · 2024: 5 · 2023: 5 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 2 · 2020: 4
FWCI
2.34
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Mindfulness (publishedVersion)
Funders
Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft (Sonderforschungsbereich 1015)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Mindfulness and Compassion Interventions
  • Social Sciences › Education › Early Childhood Education and Development
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Developmental and Educational Psychology › Student Stress and Coping
Keywords
mindfulness-based stress reduction, academic stress, student mental health, teacher well-being, perceived stress, anxiety, depression, self-regulation, socioemotional skills, creativity, stress management, implementation factors, high school students, teachers

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review