The DOI matches its Crossref record; 63 of the 63 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
An Analysis of Motivation Constructs with First‐Year Engineering Students: Relationships Among Expectancies, Values, Achievement, and Career Plans
Abstract
B ackground Researchers have identified many factors affecting undergraduate engineering students' achievement and persistence. Yet, much of this research focuses on persistence within academia, with less attention to career plans after graduation. Furthermore, the relative influence of expectancy‐versus value‐related beliefs on students' achievement and career plans is not fully understood. P urpose (H ypothesis) To address these gaps, we examined the relationships among the following motivation constructs for female and male first‐year engineering students: (a) expectancy‐related constructs that included engineering self‐efficacy (i.e., a judgment of one's ability to perform a task in engineering) and expectancy for success in engineering (i.e., the belief in the possibility of success in engineering); (b) value‐related constructs that included identification with engineering (i.e., the extent to which one defines the self through a role or performance in engineering) and engineering values (i.e., beliefs related to engineering interest, importance, and usefulness); (c) engineering achievement; and (d) engineering career plans. D esign/M ethod Participants included 363 first‐year engineering students at a large state university. The students completed an online survey instrument in the first and second semester of their first year. R esults Students' expectancy‐ and value‐related beliefs decreased over the first year for both men and women. Men reported higher levels for expectancy‐related beliefs than women. Expectancy‐related constructs predicted achievement better than the value‐related constructs, whereas value‐related constructs predicted career plans better for both men and women. C onclusions Expectancy‐ and value‐related constructs predicted different outcomes. Thus, both types of constructs are needed to understand students' achievement and career plans in engineering.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Statistical Power Analysis for the Behavioral Sciences
Muller, K. (1989) · Technometrics · doi:10.1080/00401706.1989.10488618 · Cited by 99,167
Self-efficacy: Toward a unifying theory of behavioral change
Bandura, A. (1977) · Psychological Review · doi:10.1037/0033-295x.84.2.191 · Cited by 43,925
Self-efficacy mechanism in human agency
Bandura, A. (1982) · American Psychologist · doi:10.1037/0003-066x.37.2.122 · Cited by 15,975
Social Foundations of Thought and Action
Bandura, A. (2002) · The Health Psychology Reader · doi:10.4135/9781446221129.n6 · Cited by 9,902
Expectancy-value theory of achievement motivation
Wigfield, A., & Eccles, J. S. (2000) · Contemporary Educational Psychology · doi:10.1006/ceps.1999.1015 · Cited by 7,383
Handbook of Competence and Motivation
Elliot, A. J., & Dweck, C. S. (2013) · Cited by 4,671
Nebraska Symposium on Motivation: 1955
Feshbach, S., & Jones, M. R. (1957) · The American Journal of Psychology · doi:10.2307/1419253 · Cited by 3,793
Motivational determinants of risk-taking behavior.
Atkinson, J. W. (1957) · Psychological Review · doi:10.1037/h0043445 · Cited by 3,706
Self-Efficacy Beliefs of Adolescents
(2006) · Emerald Group Publishing Limited eBooks · doi:10.1108/978-1-60752-750-3 · Cited by 3,506
Talking about Leaving: Why Undergraduates Leave the Sciences
Correll, S. J., Seymour, E., & Hewitt, N. M. (1997) · Contemporary Sociology · doi:10.2307/2655673 · Cited by 3,086
Cited by
Measuring Undergraduate Students' Engineering Self‐Efficacy: A Validation Study
Mamaril, N. A., Usher, E. L., Li, C. R., Economy, D. R., & Kennedy, M. S. (2016) · Journal of Engineering Education · doi:10.1002/jee.20121 · Cited by 302
Han, J., Kelley, T., & Knowles, J. G. (2021) · Journal for STEM Education Research · doi:10.1007/s41979-021-00053-3 · Cited by 192
Cromley, J. G., Perez, T., & Kaplan, A. (2016) · Policy Insights from the Behavioral and Brain Sciences · doi:10.1177/2372732215622648 · Cited by 159
Self-efficacy and belonging: the impact of a university makerspace
Andrews, M. E., Borrego, M., & Boklage, A. (2021) · International Journal of STEM Education · doi:10.1186/s40594-021-00285-0 · Cited by 97
Dockter, D., Uvarov, C., Guzman-Alvarez, A., & Molinaro, M. (2017) · ACS Symposium Series · doi:10.1021/bk-2017-1261.ch002 · Cited by 15
Metadata
- Authors
- Jones, B. D., Paretti, M. C., Hein, S. F., & Knott, T. W.
- Venue
- Journal of Engineering Education
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2010-10
- Volume
- 99
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 319-336
- ISSN
- 1069-4730 (ISSN-L)
- 2168-9830
- OpenAlex
- W1999677863
- Cited by
- 405
- References
- 63
- FWCI
- 30.88
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: An Analysis of Motivation Constructs with First‐Year Engineering Students: Relationships Among Expectancies, Values, Achievement, and Career Plans. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1002/j.2168-9830.2010.tb01066.x
- The paper
- Jones, B. D., Paretti, M. C., Hein, S. F., & Knott, T. W. (2010). An Analysis of Motivation Constructs with First‐Year Engineering Students: Relationships Among Expectancies, Values, Achievement, and Career Plans. Journal of Engineering Education. https://doi.org/10.1002/j.2168-9830.2010.tb01066.x
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.