Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 234

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

THE FOUR GENERATIONS OF COMPUTERIZED EDUCATIONAL MEASUREMENT

Bunderson, C. Victor, Inouye, Dillon K., Olsen, James B.·1988·ETS Research Report Series

Abstract

Educational measurement is undergoing a revolution, due to the rapid dissemination of information‐processing technology. One of the most notable aspects of that revolution is the rapidity with which it has come upon us. It is perhaps inevitable that the recent growth in power and sophistication of computing resources and the widespread dissemination of computers in daily life have brought about irreversible changes in educational measurement. Recent developments in computerized measurement are summarized by placing them in a four‐generation framework, in which each generation represents a genus of increasing sophistication and power. Generation 1. Computerized testing (CT): administering conventional tests by computer Generation 2. Computerized adaptive testing (CAT): tailoring the difficulty or contents of the next piece presented or an aspect of the timing of the next item on the basis of examinees' responses Generation 3. Continuous measurement (CM): using calibrated measures embedded in a curriculum to continuously and unobtrusively estimate dynamic changes in the student's achievement trajectory and profile as a learner Generation 4. Intelligent measurement (IM): producing intelligent scoring, interpretation of individual profiles, and advice to learners and teachers, by means of knowledge bases and inferencing procedures While acknowledging the obvious pitfalls associated with proposing a framework in a developing field, the authors hope that the suggested framework will provide an ad interim contribution to the field's universe of discourse and facilitate communication about the rapidly developing issues.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1002/j.2330-8516.1988.tb00291.x

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 1 references

Cited by

See all 234

Metadata

Authors
Bunderson, C. V., Inouye, D. K., & Olsen, J. B.
Venue
ETS Research Report Series
Publisher
Wiley
Published
1988-06
Volume
1988
Issue
1
ISSN
2330-8516 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2007888849
Cited by
234
References
1
FWCI
5.01
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: THE FOUR GENERATIONS OF COMPUTERIZED EDUCATIONAL MEASUREMENT. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1002/j.2330-8516.1988.tb00291.x
The paper
Bunderson, C. V., Inouye, D. K., & Olsen, J. B. (1988). THE FOUR GENERATIONS OF COMPUTERIZED EDUCATIONAL MEASUREMENT. ETS Research Report Series. https://doi.org/10.1002/j.2330-8516.1988.tb00291.x

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.