Cited by 130Meta-analysis and systematic reviewsPsychology Research and BibliometricsBehavioral and Psychological Studies

A survey of publication practices of single-case design researchers when treatments have small or large effects.

Shadish, William R., Zelinsky, Nicole A. M., Vevea, Jack L., Kratochwill, Thomas R.·2016·Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis

Abstract

The published literature often underrepresents studies that do not find evidence for a treatment effect; this is often called publication bias. Literature reviews that fail to include such studies may overestimate the size of an effect. Only a few studies have examined publication bias in single-case design (SCD) research, but those studies suggest that publication bias may occur. This study surveyed SCD researchers about publication preferences in response to simulated SCD results that show a range of small to large effects. Results suggest that SCD researchers are more likely to submit manuscripts that show large effects for publication and are more likely to recommend acceptance of manuscripts that show large effects when they act as a reviewer. A nontrivial minority of SCD researchers (4% to 15%) would drop 1 or 2 cases from the study if the effect size is small and then submit for publication. This article ends with a discussion of implications for publication practices in SCD research.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1002/jaba.308

Cites

46 of 46 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Shadish, W. R., Zelinsky, N. A. M., Vevea, J. L., & Kratochwill, T. R.
Affiliations
  • University of California, Merced (US)
  • University of Wisconsin–Madison (US)
Corresponding author
Shadish, William R.
Venue
Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2016-05-13
Volume
49
Issue
3
Pages
656-673
ISSN
  • 0021-8855 (ISSN-L)
  • 1938-3703
OpenAlex
W2361447118
Cited by
130
References
46
Citations by year
2026: 5 · 2025: 7 · 2024: 9 · 2023: 9 · 2022: 14 · 2021: 15 · 2020: 17 · 2019: 24 · 2018: 13 · 2017: 15 · 2016: 2
FWCI
16.81
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
U.S. Department of Education (R305D100046, R305D100033, R305D150041)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › Statistics, Probability and Uncertainty › Meta-analysis and systematic reviews
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Psychology Research and Bibliometrics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Developmental and Educational Psychology › Behavioral and Psychological Studies
Keywords
publication bias, single-case experimental design, publication practices, effect size, manuscript submission, peer review, reviewer recommendation, small effect sizes, overestimation of treatment effects
MeSH terms
Humans, Surveys and Questionnaires, Research Design, Research Personnel, Publication Bias

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review