Cited by 4Education, Achievement, and GiftednessSchool Choice and PerformanceGrit, Self-Efficacy, and Motivation

Academic Resilience in Contexts of Inequality: Motivational and Self‐Efficacy Profiles of Disadvantaged High Achievers

Open access
Rémeau, Margot, Raffy, Gaël, Borst, Grégoire·2026·Journal of Adolescence

Abstract

Introduction: Socioeconomic disparities in academic achievement are well‐documented in France and emerge early in schooling. Yet, a subset of students from socioeconomically disadvantaged backgrounds attains high academic performance, challenging deterministic accounts of educational inequality. Academic resilience offers a useful framework to identify these students, but little is known about the socio‐emotional characteristics that distinguish resilient learners during early adolescence, a critical developmental period. Methods: Using data from a nationally large cohort of 8934 French students (mean age = 11.50 years; 51% girls), we adopted a definition‐based approach to academic resilience. Learner profiles were constructed by cross‐classifying tertiles of family socioeconomic status (SES) and academic achievement assessed in Grade 7, yielding nine SES × achievement profiles. Intrinsic motivation, extrinsic motivation, and academic self‐efficacy were measured via student self‐report in Grade 6. Bayesian analyses of covariance were conducted to compare socio‐emotional profiles across groups, controlling for age and sex. Results: Decisive evidence emerged for differences in intrinsic motivation and self‐efficacy across learner profiles. Academically resilient students (low SES, high achievement) reported substantially higher intrinsic motivation and self‐efficacy than disadvantaged low achievers, and levels statistically indistinguishable from socioeconomically advantaged high achievers. Self‐efficacy showed the strongest differentiation across profiles and the steepest gradient across achievement levels. In contrast, extrinsic motivation exhibited weaker and less consistent differences between groups. Conclusions: These findings indicate that academic resilience in early adolescence is characterized by socio‐emotional profiles marked by strong self‐efficacy and elevated intrinsic motivation, comparable to those of advantaged high achievers. By highlighting psychological resources that differentiate resilient from non‐resilient students under conditions of socioeconomic disadvantage, this study identifies promising targets for interventions aimed at reducing educational inequalities.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1002/jad.70190

Cites

10 of 10 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 37

  1. Alfaro, E. C., A. J. Umaña‐Taylor, M. A. Gonzales‐Backen, M. Y. Bámaca, and K. H. Zeiders. 2009. “ Latino Adolescents' Academic Success: The Role of Discrimination, Academic Motivation, and Gender.” Journal of Adolescence 32, no. 4: 941– 962. 10.1016/j.adolescence.2008.08.007. 18973937 · DOI
  2. Areepattamannil, S., J. G. Freeman, and D. A. Klinger. 2011. “ Intrinsic Motivation, Extrinsic Motivation, and Academic Achievement Among Indian Adolescents in Canada and India.” Social Psychology of Education 14, no. 3: 427– 439. 10.1007/s11218-011-9155-1. · DOI
  3. Avci, S. 2022. “ Investigation of the Individual Characteristics That Predict Academic Resilience.” International Journal of Contemporary Educational Research 9, no. 3: 543– 556. 10.33200/ijcer.1076091. · DOI
  4. Avvisati, F. 2020. “ The Measure of Socio‐Economic Status in PISA: A Review and Some Suggested Improvements.” Large‐Scale Assessments in Education 8, no. 1: 8. 10.1186/s40536-020-00086-x. · DOI · Paper page
  5. Basileo, L. D., B. Otto, M. Lyons, N. Vannini, and M. D. Toth. 2024. “ The Role of Self‐Efficacy, Motivation, and Perceived Support of Students' Basic Psychological Needs in Academic Achievement.” Frontiers in Education 9: 1385442. 10.3389/feduc.2024.1385442. · DOI
  6. Corpus, J. H., K. A. Robinson, and S. V. Wormington. 2020. “ Trajectories of Motivation and Their Academic Correlates over the First Year of College.” Contemporary Educational Psychology 63: 101907. 10.1016/j.cedpsych.2020.101907. · DOI
  7. Deci, E. L., and R. M. Ryan. 1985. “ In Intrinsic Motivation and Self‐determination in Human Behavior.” In Conceptualizations of Intrinsic Motivation and Self‐determination. Springer.
  8. Delarue, M.‐C., L. Heidmann, and G. Raffy. 2024. “ Apprentissages Hétérogènes: Comment Les Élèves Progressent Au Collège?: Une Étude Psychométrique De L’Évolution Des Compétences Des Élèves.” Éducation & Formations 107, no. 2: 7– 34. 10.3917/edfo.107.0007. · DOI
  9. Dunn, T. J., T. Baguley, and V. Brunsden. 2014. “ From Alpha to Omega: A Practical Solution to the Pervasive Problem of Internal Consistency Estimation.” British Journal of Psychology 105, no. 3: 399– 412. 10.1111/bjop.12046. 24844115 · DOI
  10. Evans, D., G. A. Borriello, and A. P. Field. 2018. “ A Review of the Academic and Psychological Impact of the Transition to Secondary Education.” Frontiers in Psychology 9: 1482. 30210385 PMC6123573
  11. Givord, P. 2020. “ How Student's Month of Birth Is Linked to Performance at School: New Evidence from PISA (OECD Education Working.” OECD Education Working Papers 221, no. 221. 10.1787/822ea6ce-en. · DOI
  12. Haidari, S. M., A. Koçoğlu, and S. Kanadlı. 2023. “ Contribution of Locus of Control, Self‐Efficacy, and Motivation to Student Achievement: A Meta‐Analytic Structural Equation Modelling.” Journal on Efficiency and Responsibility in Education and Science 16, no. 3: 245– 261. 10.7160/eriesj.2023.160308. · DOI
  13. Kim, S., H. Cho, and L. Y. Kim. 2019. “ Socioeconomic Status and Academic Outcomes in Developing Countries: A Meta‐Analysis.” Review of educational research 89, no. 6: 875– 916. 10.3102/0034654319877155. · DOI
  14. Kolen, M. J., and R. L. Brennan. 2014. Test Equating, Scaling, and Linking: Methods and Practices. Springer. 10.1007/978-1-4939-0317-7. · DOI
  15. Lemos, M. S., and L. Veríssimo. 2014. “ The Relationships Between Intrinsic Motivation, Extrinsic Motivation, and Achievement, Along Elementary School.” Procedia—Social and Behavioral Sciences 112: 930– 938. 10.1016/j.sbspro.2014.01.1251. · DOI
  16. Linnenbrink‐Garcia, L., E. A. Patall, and R. Pekrun. 2016. “ Adaptive Motivation and Emotion in Education: Research and Principles for Instructional Design.” Policy Insights from the Behavioral and Brain Sciences 3, no. 2: 228– 236. 10.1177/2372732216644450. · DOI
  17. Liu, J., P. Peng, and L. Luo. 2020. “ The Relation Between Family Socioeconomic Status and Academic Achievement in China: A Meta‐Analysis.” Educational Psychology Review 32, no. 1: 49– 76.
  18. Logan, S., E. Medford, and N. Hughes. 2011. “ The Importance of Intrinsic Motivation for High and Low Ability Readers’ Reading Comprehension Performance.” Learning and Individual Differences 21, no. 1: 124– 128. 10.1016/j.lindif.2010.09.011. · DOI
  19. Luthar, S. S., N. L. Kumar, and N. Zillmer. 2020. “ High‐Achieving Schools Connote Risks for Adolescents: Problems Documented, Processes Implicated, and Directions for Interventions.” American Psychologist 75, no. 7: 983– 995. 10.1037/amp0000556. 31697105 · DOI
  20. Martin, A. J., and H. W. Marsh. 2009. “ Academic Resilience and Academic Buoyancy: Multidimensional and Hierarchical Conceptual Framing of Causes, Correlates and Cognate Constructs.” Oxford Review of Education 35, no. 3: 353– 370. 10.1080/03054980902934639. · DOI
  21. Martinot, P., B. Colnet, T. Breda, et al. 2025. “ Rapid Emergence of a Maths Gender Gap in First Grade.” Nature 643: 1020– 1029. 10.1038/s41586-025-09126-4. 40500443 PMC7618463 · DOI
  22. Morey, R. D., J. N. Rouder, T. Jamil, S. Urbanek, K. Forner, and A. Ly. 2025. “ BayesFactor: Computation of Bayes Factors for Common Designs.” (p. 0.9.12‐4.7) [Jeu de données]. 10.32614/CRAN.package.BayesFactor. · DOI
  23. Oakes, J. M., and P. H. Rossi. 2003. “ The Measurement of SES in Health Research: Current Practice and Steps Toward a New Approach.” Social Science & Medicine (1982) 56, no. 4: 769– 784. 10.1016/S0277-9536(02)00073-4. 12560010 · DOI · Paper page
  24. OECD. 2023. “ PISA 2022 Results.” In The State of Learning and Equity in Education (I). OECD. 10.1787/53f23881-en. · DOI
  25. Qi, B., L. Ma, and X. Wang. 2024. “ Using Meta‐Analytic Path Analysis to Examine Mechanisms Relating Students’ Perceived Feedback, Motivation, Self‐Efficacy, and Academic Performance.” Learning and Motivation 88: 102059. 10.1016/j.lmot.2024.102059. · DOI
  26. Rakesh, D., P. A. Lee, A. Gaikwad, and K. A. McLaughlin. 2025. “ Annual Research Review: Associations of Socioeconomic Status with Cognitive Function, Language Ability, and Academic Achievement in Youth: A Systematic Review of Mechanisms and Protective Factors.” Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, and Allied Disciplines 66: 417– 439. 10.1111/jcpp.14082. 39625804 PMC11920614 · DOI
  27. Rémeau, M., and G. Borst. 2026. “ Among Well‐Being, Cognitive, Metacognitive and Socio‐Emotional Skills, Executive Functions Best Explain SES–Achievement Inequalities.” Trends in Neuroscience and Education 42: 100277. 10.1016/j.tine.2026.100277. 41807070 · DOI
  28. Rémeau, M., G. Raffy, and G. Borst. 2026. “ How Do Sex and Family SES Influence the Relation Between School Well‐Being and Academic Domains? A Multi‐Group Cross‐Lagged Panel Analysis from Fifth to Eighth Grade.” Journal of Youth and Adolescence 55: 864– 884. 10.1007/s10964-025-02281-x. 41171509 · DOI
  29. Rémeau, M., P. Schmitt, R. Bijeljac‐Babic, T. Nazzi, de Carvalho, and G. Borst. 2026. “ Executive Functions as Mediators Between Family Socio‐Economic Status and Pre‐Academic Abilities.” Educational Psychology 1: 19. 10.1080/01443410.2026.2616014. · DOI
  30. Rudd, G., K. Meissel, and F. Meyer. 2021. “ Measuring Academic Resilience in Quantitative Research: A Systematic Review of the Literature.” Educational Research Review 34: 100402. 10.1016/j.edurev.2021.100402. · DOI
  31. Ryan, R. M., and E. L. Deci. 2020. “ Intrinsic and Extrinsic Motivation From a Self‐Determination Theory Perspective: Definitions, Theory, Practices, and Future Directions.” Contemporary Educational Psychology 61: 101860. 10.1016/j.cedpsych.2020.101860. · DOI · Paper page
  32. Skinner, E. A. 2023. “ Four Guideposts Toward an Integrated Model of Academic Motivation: Motivational Resilience, Academic Identity, Complex Social Ecologies, and Development.” Educational Psychology Review 35, no. 3: 80. 10.1007/s10648-023-09790-w. · DOI
  33. Steinmayr, R., and B. Spinath. 2009. “ The Importance of Motivation as a Predictor of School Achievement.” Learning and Individual Differences 19, no. 1: 80– 90. 10.1016/j.lindif.2008.05.004. · DOI
  34. Voyer, D., and S. D. Voyer. 2014. “ Gender Differences in Scholastic Achievement: A Meta‐Analysis.” Psychological Bulletin 140, no. 4: 1174– 1204. 10.1037/a0036620. 24773502 · DOI · Paper page
  35. Yan, Y., and X. Gai. 2022. “ High Achievers from Low Family Socioeconomic Status Families: Protective Factors for Academically Resilient Students.” International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health 19, no. 23: 15882. 10.3390/ijerph192315882. 36497953 PMC9741340 · DOI
  36. Yeager, D. S., R. E. Dahl, and C. S. Dweck. 2018. “ Why Interventions to Influence Adolescent Behavior Often Fail but Could Succeed.” Perspectives on Psychological Science 13, no. 1: 101– 122. 10.1177/1745691617722620. 29232535 PMC5758430 · DOI · Paper page
  37. Zumbo, B. D. 2007. “ Three Generations of DIF Analyses: Considering Where it Has Been, Where it is Now, and Where it is Going.” Language Assessment Quarterly 4, no. 2: 223– 233. 10.1080/15434300701375832. · DOI

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Rémeau, M., Raffy, G., & Borst, G.
Affiliations
  • Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique (FR)
  • Ministere de l'Education Nationale (FR)
Corresponding author
Rémeau, Margot
Venue
Journal of Adolescence
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2026-05-28
Volume
98
Issue
6
Pages
1939-1956
ISSN
  • 0140-1971 (ISSN-L)
  • 1095-9254
OpenAlex
W7162669969
Cited by
4
References
10
Citations by year
2026: 4
FWCI
22.42
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Journal of Adolescence (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
Agence Nationale de la Recherche (ANR-21-ESRE-0034)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Education, Achievement, and Giftedness
  • Social Sciences › Education › School Choice and Performance
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Grit, Self-Efficacy, and Motivation
Keywords
academic resilience, educational inequality, socioeconomic status, academic performance, intrinsic motivation, extrinsic motivation, academic self-efficacy, early adolescence, French students
MeSH terms
Academic Success, Low Socioeconomic Status, Adolescent, Child, Female, France, Humans, Male, Motivation, Social Class, Socioeconomic Factors, Students, Self Efficacy, Resilience, Psychological

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review