Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 16

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Effect of chlorine and monochloramine in drinking water on the developing rat fetus

Abdel‐Rahman, Mohamed S., Berardi, Mark R., Bull, Richard J.·1982·Journal of Applied Toxicology

Abstract

Chlorine dioxide (ClO 2) or monochloramine (NH 2 Cl) may be considered as an alternative to chlorine (HOCl) as a disinfectant in public water supplies, since chlorination produces trihalomethanes. This study was conducted to determine the effect of chlorine and monochloramine on rat fetuses. Female rats were administered 0, 1, 10 or 100 mg l−1 NH 2 Cl or HOCl daily in the drinking water for 2 1/2 months prior to and throughout gestation. Rats were sacrificed on Day 20 of gestation and fetuses were preserved for soft‐tissue and skeletal examination. No significant increase in fetal resorptions was found in any treated group. A slight increase in skeletal variants (such as incompletely ossified or missing sternebrae, or rudimentary ribs) was seen in 10 and 100 mg l−1 HOCl groups. Soft‐tissue defects, mainly improper orientation of the heart or adrenal agenesis, were observed in the 100 mg l−1 HOCl group. The percentage of total defects (skeletal and soft‐tissue) was increased significantly over control in the 100 mg l−1 HOCl group; however, monochloramine did not produce any significant changes in rat fetuses at any dose level.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1002/jat.2550020307

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

No references could be resolved yet.

Research works printed but not linked: 19

  1. Bellar T. A., 1974, The occurrence of organohalides in chlorinated drinking water, J. Am. Water Works Assoc., 71, 40
  2. Rook J. J., 1974, Formation of haloforms during chlorination of natural waters, Water Treat. Exam., 23, 234
  3. 10.1002/j.1551-8833.1975.tb02318.x · DOI · Paper page
  4. Eschenbrenner A., 1945, Induction of hepatomas in mice by repeated oral administration of chloroform with observations on sex differences, J. Natl Cancer Inst., 5, 251
  5. 10.1016/0041-008X(71)90301-2 · DOI
  6. 10.2105/AJPH.67.8.725 · DOI
  7. 10.1126/science.935854 · DOI · Paper page
  8. Symons J. M., 1977, Ozone, Chlorine Dioxide and Chloramines as Alternatives to Chlorine for Distinfection of Drinking Water
  9. 10.1021/es60106a008 · doi:10.1021/es60106a008
  10. 10.1126/science.181.4098.463 · DOI
  11. Hopkins E. S., 1966, Water Purification Control, 108
  12. 10.1126/science.818709 · DOI · Paper page
  13. 10.1073/pnas.44.10.1072 · DOI · Paper page
  14. Moore G. S., 1980, The health effects of chloramines in potable water supplies. A literature review, J. Environ. Pathol. Toxicol., 4, 257
  15. Zillich J. A., 1972, Toxicity of combined chlorine residuals to freshwater fish, J. Water Pollut. Control. Fed., 44, 212
  16. Palin A. T., 1967, Methods for the determination in water, of free and combined available chlorine, chlorine dioxide and chlorite, bromine, iodine and ozone using diethyl‐ p‐phenylene diamine (DPD), J. Inst. Water Eng., 21, 537
  17. Wilson J. G., 1965, Teratology: Principles and Techniques, 262
  18. 10.1002/tera.1420080311 · doi:10.1002/tera.1420080311
  19. 10.1002/tera.1420030409 · doi:10.1002/tera.1420030409

Cited by

Metadata

Authors
Abdel‐Rahman, M. S., Berardi, M. R., & Bull, R. J.
Venue
Journal of Applied Toxicology
Publisher
Wiley
Published
1982-06
Volume
2
Issue
3
Pages
156-159
ISSN
  • 0260-437X
  • 1099-1263
Cited by
16
References
0
Language
en

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.