The DOI matches its Crossref record.
The chick chorioallantoic membrane as a novel in vivo model for the testing of biomaterials
Abstract
Current in vivo models for testing biomaterials are time and labor intensive as well as expensive. This article describes a new approach for testing biomaterials in vivo using the chorioallantoic membrane (CAM) of the developing chicken embryo, as an alternative to the traditional mammalian models. Fertilized chicken eggs were incubated for 4 days, at which time a small window was cut in the shell of the egg. After 1 week of incubation, the CAM received several test materials, including the endotoxin LPS, a cotton thread and a Silastic tubing. One day and 1 week later, the tissue response to the test materials was assessed using gross, histological, and scanning electron microscope evaluations. The inflammatory response of the chorioallantoic membrane to biomaterials was fully characterized and found to be similar to that of the mammalian response and was also seen to vary according to test materials. We also found that the structure and geometry of the test materials greatly influenced the incorporation of the samples in the CAM. The similarity of the tissue response of the CAM with the mammalian models, plus the low cost, simplicity, and possibility to continuously visualize the test site through the shell window make this animal model particularly attractive for the rapid in vivo screening of biomaterials. © 2002 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J Biomed Mater Res 62: 273–282, 2002
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Eke, G., Mangir, N., Hasirci, N., MacNeil, S., & Hasirci, V. (2017) · Biomaterials · doi:10.1016/j.biomaterials.2017.03.021 · Cited by 417
Lokman, N. A., Elder, A. S. F., Ricciardelli, C., & Oehler, M. K. (2012) · International Journal of Molecular Sciences · doi:10.3390/ijms13089959 · Cited by 358
Biocompatible Materials for Continuous Glucose Monitoring Devices
Nichols, S. P., Koh, A., Storm, W. L., Shin, J. H., & Schoenfisch, M. H. (2013) · Chemical Reviews · doi:10.1021/cr300387j · Cited by 347
Koschwanez, H. E., & Reichert, W. M. (2007) · Biomaterials · doi:10.1016/j.biomaterials.2007.03.034 · Cited by 181
Allgayer, H., Mahapatra, S., Mishra, B., Swain, B., Saha, S., Khanra, S., Kumari, K., Panda, V. K., Malhotra, D., Patil, N. S., et al. (2025) · Molecular Cancer · doi:10.1186/s12943-025-02338-2 · Cited by 127
Metadata
- Authors
- Valdes, T. I., Kreutzer, D., & Moussy, F.
- Venue
- Journal of Biomedical Materials Research
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2002-08-02
- Volume
- 62
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 273-282
- ISSN
- 0021-9304 (ISSN-L)
- 1097-4636
- OpenAlex
- W2115452170
- Cited by
- 191
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 1.51
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: The chick chorioallantoic membrane as a novel in vivo model for the testing of biomaterials. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1002/jbm.10152
- The paper
- Valdes, T. I., Kreutzer, D., & Moussy, F. (2002). The chick chorioallantoic membrane as a novel in vivo model for the testing of biomaterials. Journal of Biomedical Materials Research. https://doi.org/10.1002/jbm.10152
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.