The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Biocompatibility of silicon‐based electrode arrays implanted in feline cortical tissue
Abstract
The passive biocompatibility of silicon‐based electrode arrays was studied in feline cortical tissue. Three types of arrays were used: uncoated, coated with polyimide, and coated with polyimide over an adhesion promoter. Fifteen arrays were implanted for 24 h to determine early tissue reaction to the implantation procedure, and twelve arraays were implanted for 6 months to determine structural and material biocompatibility. Edema and hemorrhage were present around the short‐term implants, but involved less than 6% of the total area of the tissue covered by the array. With chronic implants, leukocytes were rarely present and macrophages were found around roughly one‐third of the tracks. Remnants of foreign material from the electrodes could be identified in less than 10% of the tracks. Gliosis was found around all tracks, forming an annulus between 20 and 40 μm thick. A capsule was not always present, and never exceeded a thickness of 9 μm. These results suggest that the implantation procedure produces limited amounts of tissue damage, and that the arrays are biocompatible. However, the arrays insulated with polyimide over a primer had significantly greater involvement of macrophages, gliosis, and capsule formation than uncoated arrays and arrays insulated with polyimide without printer, perhaps indicating a reaction to aluminum oxide in the primer. © 1993 John Wiley & Sons, Inc.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Campbell, P. K., Jones, K. E., Huber, R. J., Horch, K. W., & Normann, R. A. (1991) · IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering · doi:10.1109/10.83588 · Cited by 881
Self-citationPhagocytic and metabolic reactions to chronically implanted metal brain electrodes.
Babb, T. L., & Kupfer, W. (1984) · Experimental Neurology · doi:10.1016/0014-4886(84)90179-1 · Cited by 51
Cited by
Electrical stimulation of excitable tissue: design of efficacious and safe protocols
Merrill, D. R., Bikson, M., & Jefferys, J. G. R. (2005) · Journal of Neuroscience Methods · doi:10.1016/j.jneumeth.2004.10.020 · Cited by 2,078
Response of brain tissue to chronically implanted neural electrodes
Polikov, V. S., Tresco, P. A., & Reichert, W. M. (2005) · Journal of Neuroscience Methods · doi:10.1016/j.jneumeth.2005.08.015 · Cited by 1,896
Viventi, J., Kim, D.-H., Vigeland, L., Frechette, E. S., Blanco, J. A., Kim, Y.-S., Avrin, A. E., Tiruvadi, V. R., Hwang, S.-W., Vanleer, A. C., et al. (2011) · Nature Neuroscience · doi:10.1038/nn.2973 · Cited by 1,136
Larrañeta, E., Lutton, R. E. M., Woolfson, A. D., & Donnelly, R. F. (2016) · Materials Science and Engineering: R: Reports · doi:10.1016/j.mser.2016.03.001 · Cited by 964
Biran, R., Martin, D. C., & Tresco, P. A. (2005) · Experimental Neurology · doi:10.1016/j.expneurol.2005.04.020 · Cited by 893
Metadata
- Authors
- Schmidt, S., Horch, K., & Normann, R.
- Venue
- Journal of Biomedical Materials Research
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 1993-11
- Volume
- 27
- Issue
- 11
- Pages
- 1393-1399
- ISSN
- 0021-9304 (ISSN-L)
- 1097-4636
- OpenAlex
- W1975188658
- Cited by
- 183
- References
- 2
- FWCI
- 0.46
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Biocompatibility of silicon‐based electrode arrays implanted in feline cortical tissue. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1002/jbm.820271106
- The paper
- Schmidt, S., Horch, K., & Normann, R. (1993). Biocompatibility of silicon‐based electrode arrays implanted in feline cortical tissue. Journal of Biomedical Materials Research. https://doi.org/10.1002/jbm.820271106
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.