The DOI matches its Crossref record; 3 of the 3 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Effects of porosity and pore size on in vitro degradation of three‐dimensional porous poly(D,L‐lactide‐co‐glycolide) scaffolds for tissue engineering
Abstract
In vitro degradation of seven three‐dimensional porous scaffolds composed of PLGA85/15, a very useful poly(D,L‐lactide‐co‐glycolide), was performed in phosphate‐buffered saline solution at 37°C up to 26 weeks, and effects of porosity (80–95%) and pore size (50–450 μm) on the degradation of the scaffolds were investigated. A series of quantities were measured during the degradation processes: molecular weight and its distribution of PLGA; compressive strength and modulus; and weight, dimension, and porosity of scaffolds. In all of cases with different pore morphologies, the degradation processes obeyed a three‐stage model. Scaffolds with a higher porosity or a smaller pore size degraded more slowly than and thus outlasted those with a lower porosity or a larger pore size. The effects are both attributed to a wall effect and a surface area effect because the scaffolds with lower porosities or larger pores possess thicker pore walls and smaller surface area, which depress the diffusion of acidic degradation products and thus results in a stronger acid‐catalyzed hydrolysis. This work suggests that, in designing a tissue‐engineering scaffold composed of PLGA and adjusting its degradation rate, the effects of pore morphologies should be taken into consideration in addition to those of chemical composition and condensed state of raw materials. © 2005 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J Biomed Mater Res, 2005
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Synthetic biodegradable polymers as orthopedic devices
Middleton, J. C., & Tipton, A. J. (2000) · Biomaterials · doi:10.1016/s0142-9612(00)00101-0 · Cited by 2,741
In vitro and in vivo degradation of porous poly(dl-lactic-co-glycolic acid) foams
Lu, L., Peter, S. J., D. Lyman, M., Lai, H.-L., Leite, S. M., Tamada, J. A., Uyama, S., Vacanti, J. P., Langer, R., & Mikos, A. G. (2000) · Biomaterials · doi:10.1016/s0142-9612(00)00047-8 · Cited by 668
Host response to tissue engineered devices
Babensee, J. E., Anderson, J. M., McIntire, L. V., & Mikos, A. G. (1998) · Advanced Drug Delivery Reviews · doi:10.1016/s0169-409x(98)00023-4 · Cited by 585
Cited by
On the mechanisms of biocompatibility
Williams, D. F. (2008) · Biomaterials · doi:10.1016/j.biomaterials.2008.04.023 · Cited by 2,772
Li, M., Mondrinos, M. J., Chen, X., Gandhi, M. R., Ko, F. K., & Lelkes, P. I. (2006) · Journal of Biomedical Materials Research Part A · doi:10.1002/jbm.a.30833 · Cited by 358
Recent advances in regenerative biomaterials
Cao, D., & Ding, J. (2022) · Regenerative Biomaterials · doi:10.1093/rb/rbac098 · Cited by 259
Self-citationStrategic Design and Fabrication of Engineered Scaffolds for Articular Cartilage Repair
Izadifar, Z., Chen, X., & Kulyk, W. (2012) · Journal of Functional Biomaterials · doi:10.3390/jfb3040799 · Cited by 203
Zhang, Q., Jiang, Y., Zhang, Y., Ye, Z., Tan, W., & Lang, M. (2013) · Polymer Degradation and Stability · doi:10.1016/j.polymdegradstab.2012.10.008 · Cited by 102
Metadata
- Authors
- Wu, L., & Ding, J.
- Venue
- Journal of Biomedical Materials Research Part A
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2005-08-24
- Volume
- 75A
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 767-777
- ISSN
- 1549-3296 (ISSN-L)
- 1552-4965
- OpenAlex
- W1966316996
- Cited by
- 208
- References
- 3
- FWCI
- 5.54
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Effects of porosity and pore size on in vitro degradation of three‐dimensional porous poly(D,L‐lactide‐co‐glycolide) scaffolds for tissue engineering. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1002/jbm.a.30487
- The paper
- Wu, L., & Ding, J. (2005). Effects of porosity and pore size on in vitro degradation of three‐dimensional porous poly(D,L‐lactide‐co‐glycolide) scaffolds for tissue engineering. Journal of Biomedical Materials Research Part A. https://doi.org/10.1002/jbm.a.30487
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.