The DOI matches its Crossref record; 46 of the 46 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Co‐electrospun poly(lactide‐co‐glycolide), gelatin, and elastin blends for tissue engineering scaffolds
Abstract
In this study, we describe composite scaffolds composed of synthetic and natural materials with physicochemical properties suitable for tissue engineering applications. Fibrous scaffolds were co‐electrospun from a blend of a synthetic biodegradable polymer (poly(lactic‐co‐glycolic acid), PLGA, 10% solution) and two natural proteins, gelatin (denatured collagen, 8% solution) and α‐elastin (20% solution) at ratios of 3:1:2 and 2:2:2 (v/v/v). The resulting PLGA–gelatin–elastin (PGE) fibers were homogeneous in appearance with an average diameter of 380 ± 80 nm, which was considerably smaller than fibers made under identical conditions from the starting materials (PLGA, 780 ± 200 nm; gelatin, 447 ± 123 nm; elastin, 1060 ± 170 nm). Upon hydration, PGE fibers swelled to an average fiber diameter of 963 ± 132 nm, but did not disintegrate. Importantly, PGE scaffolds were stable in an aqueous environment without crosslinking and were more elastic than those made of pure elastin fibers. To investigate the cytocompatibility of PGE, we cultured H9c2 rat cardiac myoblasts and rat bone marrow stromal cells (BMSCs) on fibrous PGE scaffolds. We found that myoblasts grew equally as well or slightly better on the scaffolds than on tissue‐culture plastic. Microscopic evaluation confirmed that myoblasts reached confluence on the scaffold surfaces while simultaneously growing into the scaffolds. Histological characterization of the PGE constructs indicated that BMSCs penetrated into the center of scaffolds and began proliferating shortly after seeding. Our results suggest that fibrous scaffolds made of PGE and similar biomimetic blends of natural and synthetic polymers may be useful for engineering soft tissues, such as heart, lung, and blood vessels. © 2006 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J Biomed Mater Res, 2006
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
A review on polymer nanofibers by electrospinning and their applications in nanocomposites
Huang, Z.-M., Zhang, Y.-Z., Kotaki, M., & Ramakrishna, S. (2003) · Composites Science and Technology · doi:10.1016/s0266-3538(03)00178-7 · Cited by 7,556
Third-Generation Biomedical Materials
Hench, L. L., & Polak, J. M. (2002) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.1067404 · Cited by 2,789
Electrospun nanofibrous structure: A novel scaffold for tissue engineering
Li, W., Laurencin, C. T., Caterson, E. J., Tuan, R. S., & Ko, F. K. (2002) · Journal of Biomedical Materials Research · doi:10.1002/jbm.10167 · Cited by 2,427
Self-citationA biodegradable nanofiber scaffold by electrospinning and its potential for bone tissue engineering
Yoshimoto, H., Shin, Y. M., Terai, H., & Vacanti, J. P. (2003) · Biomaterials · doi:10.1016/s0142-9612(02)00635-x · Cited by 1,977
COLLAGENS: Molecular Biology, Diseases, and Potentials for Therapy
Prockop, D. J., & Kivirikko, K. I. (1995) · Annual Review of Biochemistry · doi:10.1146/annurev.bi.64.070195.002155 · Cited by 1,623
Aligned biodegradable nanofibrous structure: a potential scaffold for blood vessel engineering
Xu, C. Y., Inai, R., Kotaki, M., & Ramakrishna, S. (2004) · Biomaterials · doi:10.1016/s0142-9612(03)00593-3 · Cited by 1,213
Min, B.-M., Lee, G., Kim, S. H., Nam, Y. S., Lee, T. S., & Park, W. H. (2004) · Biomaterials · doi:10.1016/j.biomaterials.2003.08.045 · Cited by 1,151
Biomaterials in Tissue Engineering
Hubbell, J. A. (1995) · Nature Biotechnology · doi:10.1038/nbt0695-565 · Cited by 1,060
Electrospun chitosan-based nanofibers and their cellular compatibility
Bhattarai, N., Edmondson, D., Veiseh, O., Matsen, F. A., & Zhang, M. (2005) · Biomaterials · doi:10.1016/j.biomaterials.2005.03.027 · Cited by 898
Electrospinning polyaniline-contained gelatin nanofibers for tissue engineering applications
Li, M., Guo, Y., Wei, Y., MacDiarmid, A. G., & Lelkes, P. I. (2006) · Biomaterials · doi:10.1016/j.biomaterials.2005.11.037 · Cited by 856
Self-citation
Cited by
Electrospun poly(ɛ-caprolactone)/gelatin nanofibrous scaffolds for nerve tissue engineering
Ghasemi-Mobarakeh, L., Prabhakaran, M. P., Morshed, M., Nasr-Esfahani, M.-H., & Ramakrishna, S. (2008) · Biomaterials · doi:10.1016/j.biomaterials.2008.08.007 · Cited by 1,152
Three-Dimensional Cell Culture Matrices: State of the Art
Lee, J., Cuddihy, M. J., & Kotov, N. A. (2008) · Tissue Engineering Part B: Reviews · doi:10.1089/teb.2007.0150 · Cited by 1,047
Sell, S. A., Wolfe, P. S., Garg, K., McCool, J. M., Rodriguez, I. A., & Bowlin, G. L. (2010) · Polymers · doi:10.3390/polym2040522 · Cited by 578
Extracellular Vesicles: Potential Roles in Regenerative Medicine
De Jong, O. G., Van Balkom, B. W. M., Schiffelers, R. M., Bouten, C. V. C., & Verhaar, M. C. (2014) · Frontiers in Immunology · doi:10.3389/fimmu.2014.00608 · Cited by 351
Ghasemi-Mobarakeh, L., Prabhakaran, M. P., Morshed, M., Nasr-Esfahani, M. H., & Ramakrishna, S. (2009) · Tissue Engineering Part A · doi:10.1089/ten.tea.2008.0689 · Cited by 318
Metadata
- Authors
- Li, M., Mondrinos, M. J., Chen, X., Gandhi, M. R., Ko, F. K., & Lelkes, P. I.
- Venue
- Journal of Biomedical Materials Research Part A
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2006-08-31
- Volume
- 79A
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 963-973
- ISSN
- 1549-3296 (ISSN-L)
- 1552-4965
- OpenAlex
- W2073363614
- Cited by
- 358
- References
- 46
- FWCI
- 7.33
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Co‐electrospun poly(lactide‐co‐glycolide), gelatin, and elastin blends for tissue engineering scaffolds. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1002/jbm.a.30833
- The paper
- Li, M., Mondrinos, M. J., Chen, X., Gandhi, M. R., Ko, F. K., & Lelkes, P. I. (2006). Co‐electrospun poly(lactide‐co‐glycolide), gelatin, and elastin blends for tissue engineering scaffolds. Journal of Biomedical Materials Research Part A. https://doi.org/10.1002/jbm.a.30833
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.