The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Crosslinked chitosan: Its physical properties and the effects of matrix stiffness on chondrocyte cell morphology and proliferation
Abstract
Chitosan [β(1‐4)‐2 amino‐2‐deoxy‐D‐glucose], the natural polyaminosaccharide derived from N‐deacetylation of chitin [β(1‐4)‐2 acetamide‐2‐deoxy‐D‐glucose], has been shown to possess attractive biological and cell interactive properties. Recently chitosan and chitosan analogs have also been shown to support the growth and continued function of chondrocytes. In the present study, chitosan substrates are crosslinked with a functional diepoxide (1,4 butanediol diglycidyl ether) to alter its mechanical property, and the viability and proliferation of the canine articular chondrocytes seeded on the crosslinked surface are further assayed. Of interest is the impact of substrate stiffness on the growth and proliferation of articular canine chondrocytes. Crosslinked scaffolds were also subjected to degradation by chitosanase to examine the impact of crosslinking on enzyme‐assisted degradation. The hydrophilicity and compression modulus of the crosslinked surfaces were measured via contact‐angle measurements and compression tests, respectively. Scanning electron microscopy (SEM) and fluorescent staining were used to observe the proliferation and morphology of chondrocyte cells on noncrosslinked and crosslinked surfaces. The crosslinked chitosan was found to be nontoxic to chondrocytes and more hydrophilic. Its compression modulus and stiffness increased, which may improve the scaffold resistance to wear and in vivo shrinkage once implanted. The increased stiffness also seemed to serve as an additional mechanical stimulus to promote chondrocyte growth and proliferation. The cell morphology on crosslinked scaffolds seen by SEM and fluorescent stain was the typical chondrocytic rounded shape. The method proposed provides a nontoxic way to increase the mechanical strength of the chitosan scaffolds. © 2005 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J Biomed Mater Res, 2005
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Chung, C., & Burdick, J. A. (2008) · Advanced Drug Delivery Reviews · doi:10.1016/j.addr.2007.08.027 · Cited by 760
Indentation Versus Tensile Measurements of Young's Modulus for Soft Biological Tissues
McKee, C. T., Last, J. A., Russell, P., & Murphy, C. J. (2011) · Tissue Engineering Part B: Reviews · doi:10.1089/ten.teb.2010.0520 · Cited by 708
Biomaterials for stem cell differentiation
Dawson, E., Mapili, G., Erickson, K., Taqvi, S., & Roy, K. (2008) · Advanced Drug Delivery Reviews · doi:10.1016/j.addr.2007.08.037 · Cited by 448
Jagur‐Grodzinski, J. (2006) · Polymers for Advanced Technologies · doi:10.1002/pat.729 · Cited by 394
Influence of substrate stiffness on the phenotype of heart cells
Bhana, B., Iyer, R. K., Chen, W. L. K., Zhao, R., Sider, K. L., Likhitpanichkul, M., Simmons, C. A., & Radisic, M. (2010) · Biotechnology and Bioengineering · doi:10.1002/bit.22647 · Cited by 373
Metadata
- Authors
- Subramanian, A., & Lin, H.
- Venue
- Journal of Biomedical Materials Research Part A
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2005-08-18
- Volume
- 75A
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 742-753
- ISSN
- 1549-3296 (ISSN-L)
- 1552-4965
- OpenAlex
- W2125478402
- Cited by
- 164
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 3.57
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Crosslinked chitosan: Its physical properties and the effects of matrix stiffness on chondrocyte cell morphology and proliferation. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1002/jbm.a.30489
- The paper
- Subramanian, A., & Lin, H. (2005). Crosslinked chitosan: Its physical properties and the effects of matrix stiffness on chondrocyte cell morphology and proliferation. Journal of Biomedical Materials Research Part A. https://doi.org/10.1002/jbm.a.30489
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.