Cited by 59Tissue Engineering and Regenerative MedicineBone Tissue Engineering MaterialsSurgical Sutures and Adhesives

A mouse model to evaluate the interface between skin and a percutaneous device

Isenhath, S. N., Fukano, Y., Usui, M. L., Underwood, R. A., Irvin, C. A., Marshall, A. J., Hauch, K. D., Ratner, B. D. +2 more·2007·Journal of Biomedical Materials Research Part A

Abstract

Percutaneous medical devices are integral in the management and treatment of disease. The space created between the skin and the device becomes a haven for bacterial invasion and biofilm formation and results in infection. We hypothesize that sealing this space via integration of the skin into the device will create a barrier against bacterial invasion. The purpose of this study was to develop an animal model in which the interaction between skin and biomaterials can be evaluated. Porous poly(2‐hydroxyethyl methacrylate) [poly(HEMA)] rods were implanted for 7 days in the dorsal skin of C57 BL/6 mice. The porous poly(HEMA) rods were surface‐modified with carbonyldiimidazole (CDI) or CDI plus laminin 5; unmodified rods served as control. Implant sites were sealed with 2‐octyl cyanoacrylate; corn pads and adhesive dressings were tested for stabilization of implants. All rods remained intact for the duration of the study. There was histological evidence of both epidermal and dermal integration into all poly(HEMA) rods regardless of treatment. This in vivo model permits examination of the implant/skin interface and will be useful for future studies designed to facilitate skin cell attachment where percutaneous devices penetrate the skin. © 2007 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J Biomed Mater Res, 2007

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1002/jbm.a.31391

Cites

42 of 42 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Preliminary results suggested that a synthetic scaffold of spherical, interconnected, and tightly controlled pore sizes (30-40 μm in diameter) can vascularize rapidly in vivo with reduced fibrotic response.

    “Preliminary results suggested that a synthetic scaffold of spherical, interconnected, and tightly controlled pore sizes (30–40 μm in diameter) can vascularize rapidly in vivo with reduced fibrotic response (10, 11).”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Isenhath, S. N., Fukano, Y., Usui, M. L., Underwood, R. A., Irvin, C. A., Marshall, A. J., Hauch, K. D., Ratner, B. D., Fleckman, P., & Olerud, J. E.
Affiliations
University of Washington (US)
Corresponding author
Olerud, J. E.
Venue
Journal of Biomedical Materials Research Part A
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2007-06-13
Volume
83A
Issue
4
Pages
915-922
ISSN
  • 1549-3296 (ISSN-L)
  • 1552-4965
OpenAlex
W2021503231
Cited by
59
References
42
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 1 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 9 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 2 · 2020: 2 · 2019: 4 · 2018: 2 · 2017: 7 · 2015: 2 · 2014: 3 · 2013: 3 · 2012: 5
FWCI
2.99
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Journal of Biomedical Materials Research Part A (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases (DK 59221, R01DK059221)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Surgery › Tissue Engineering and Regenerative Medicine
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Biomedical Engineering › Bone Tissue Engineering Materials
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Surgery › Surgical Sutures and Adhesives
Keywords
poly(2-hydroxyethyl methacrylate), porous biomaterials, laminin-5, 2-octyl cyanoacrylate, adhesive dressings, implant stabilization, bacterial infection prevention, biofilm formation, mouse model
MeSH terms
Animals, Biocompatible Materials, Polyhydroxyethyl Methacrylate, Skin, Skin Absorption, Models, Animal, Mice

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review