Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 227

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Impact of pore size on the vascularization and osseointegration of ceramic bone substitutes in vivo

Klenke, Frank M., Liu, Yuelian, Yuan, Huipin, Hunziker, Ernst B., Siebenrock, Klaus A., Hofstetter, Willy·2008·Journal of Biomedical Materials Research Part A

Abstract

The repair of bone defects with biomaterials depends on a sufficient vascularization of the implantation site. We analyzed the effect of pore size on the vascularization and osseointegration of biphasic calcium phosphate particles, which were implanted into critical‐sized cranial defects in Balb/c mice. Dense particles and particles with pore sizes in the ranges 40–70, 70–140, 140–210, and 210–280 μm were tested (n = 6 animals per group). Angiogenesis, vascularization, and leukocyte–endothelium interactions were monitored for 28 days by intravital microscopy. The formation of new bone and the bone–interface contact (BIC) were determined histomorphometrically. Twenty‐eight days after implantation, the functional capillary density was significantly higher with ceramic particles whose pore sizes exceeded 140 μm [140–210 μm: 6.6 (±0.8) mm/mm 2; 210–280 μm: 7.3 (±0.6) mm/mm 2] than with those whose pore sizes were lesser than 140 μm [40–70 μm: 5.3 (±0.4) mm/mm 2; 70–140 μm: 5.6 (±0.3) mm/mm 2] or with dense particles [5.7 (±0.8) mm/mm 2]. The volume of newly‐formed bone deposited within the implants increased as the pore size increased [40–70 μm: 0.07 (±0.02) mm 3; 70–140 μm: 0.10 (±0.06) mm 3; 140–210 μm: 0.13 (±0.05) mm 3; 210–280 μm: 0.15 (±0.06) mm 3]. Similar results were observed for the BIC. The data demonstrates pore size to be a critical parameter governing the dynamic processes of vascularization and osseointegration of bone substitutes. © 2007 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J Biomed Mater Res, 2008

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1002/jbm.a.31559

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Cited by

See all 227

Metadata

Authors
Klenke, F. M., Liu, Y., Yuan, H., Hunziker, E. B., Siebenrock, K. A., & Hofstetter, W.
Venue
Journal of Biomedical Materials Research Part A
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2007-09-26
Volume
85A
Issue
3
Pages
777-786
ISSN
  • 1549-3296 (ISSN-L)
  • 1552-4965
OpenAlex
W1990414407
Cited by
227
References
1
FWCI
2.97
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Impact of pore size on the vascularization and osseointegration of ceramic bone substitutes in vivo. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1002/jbm.a.31559
The paper
Klenke, F. M., Liu, Y., Yuan, H., Hunziker, E. B., Siebenrock, K. A., & Hofstetter, W. (2008). Impact of pore size on the vascularization and osseointegration of ceramic bone substitutes in vivo. Journal of Biomedical Materials Research Part A. https://doi.org/10.1002/jbm.a.31559

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.