The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Impact of pore size on the vascularization and osseointegration of ceramic bone substitutes in vivo
Abstract
The repair of bone defects with biomaterials depends on a sufficient vascularization of the implantation site. We analyzed the effect of pore size on the vascularization and osseointegration of biphasic calcium phosphate particles, which were implanted into critical‐sized cranial defects in Balb/c mice. Dense particles and particles with pore sizes in the ranges 40–70, 70–140, 140–210, and 210–280 μm were tested (n = 6 animals per group). Angiogenesis, vascularization, and leukocyte–endothelium interactions were monitored for 28 days by intravital microscopy. The formation of new bone and the bone–interface contact (BIC) were determined histomorphometrically. Twenty‐eight days after implantation, the functional capillary density was significantly higher with ceramic particles whose pore sizes exceeded 140 μm [140–210 μm: 6.6 (±0.8) mm/mm 2; 210–280 μm: 7.3 (±0.6) mm/mm 2] than with those whose pore sizes were lesser than 140 μm [40–70 μm: 5.3 (±0.4) mm/mm 2; 70–140 μm: 5.6 (±0.3) mm/mm 2] or with dense particles [5.7 (±0.8) mm/mm 2]. The volume of newly‐formed bone deposited within the implants increased as the pore size increased [40–70 μm: 0.07 (±0.02) mm 3; 70–140 μm: 0.10 (±0.06) mm 3; 140–210 μm: 0.13 (±0.05) mm 3; 210–280 μm: 0.15 (±0.06) mm 3]. Similar results were observed for the BIC. The data demonstrates pore size to be a critical parameter governing the dynamic processes of vascularization and osseointegration of bone substitutes. © 2007 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J Biomed Mater Res, 2008
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
The effect of scaffold degradation rate on three-dimensional cell growth and angiogenesis
Sung, H.-J., Meredith, C., Johnson, C., & Galis, Z. S. (2004) · Biomaterials · doi:10.1016/j.biomaterials.2004.01.066 · Cited by 804
Cited by
Biofabrication of bone tissue: approaches, challenges and translation for bone regeneration
Tang, D., Tare, R. S., Yang, L.-Y., Williams, D. F., Ou, K.-L., & Oreffo, R. O. C. (2016) · Biomaterials · doi:10.1016/j.biomaterials.2016.01.024 · Cited by 613
Synthetic bone: Design by additive manufacturing
Barba, D., Alabort, E., & Reed, R. C. (2019) · Acta Biomaterialia · doi:10.1016/j.actbio.2019.07.049 · Cited by 316
Vascularized Bone Tissue Engineering: Approaches for Potential Improvement
Nguyen, L. H., Annabi, N., Nikkhah, M., Bae, H., Binan, L., Park, S., Kang, Y., Yang, Y., & Khademhosseini, A. (2012) · Tissue Engineering Part B: Reviews · doi:10.1089/ten.teb.2012.0012 · Cited by 313
Evaluating 3D‐Printed Biomaterials as Scaffolds for Vascularized Bone Tissue Engineering
Wang, M. O., Vorwald, C. E., Dreher, M. L., Mott, E. J., Cheng, M., Cinar, A., Mehdizadeh, H., Somo, S., Dean, D., Brey, E. M., et al. (2015) · Advanced Materials · doi:10.1002/adma.201403943 · Cited by 301
Xia, Z., Yu, X., Jiang, X., Brody, H. D., Rowe, D. W., & Wei, M. (2013) · Acta Biomaterialia · doi:10.1016/j.actbio.2013.03.038 · Cited by 178
Metadata
- Authors
- Klenke, F. M., Liu, Y., Yuan, H., Hunziker, E. B., Siebenrock, K. A., & Hofstetter, W.
- Venue
- Journal of Biomedical Materials Research Part A
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2007-09-26
- Volume
- 85A
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 777-786
- ISSN
- 1549-3296 (ISSN-L)
- 1552-4965
- OpenAlex
- W1990414407
- Cited by
- 227
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 2.97
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Impact of pore size on the vascularization and osseointegration of ceramic bone substitutes in vivo. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1002/jbm.a.31559
- The paper
- Klenke, F. M., Liu, Y., Yuan, H., Hunziker, E. B., Siebenrock, K. A., & Hofstetter, W. (2008). Impact of pore size on the vascularization and osseointegration of ceramic bone substitutes in vivo. Journal of Biomedical Materials Research Part A. https://doi.org/10.1002/jbm.a.31559
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.