Cited by 61Silk-based biomaterials and applicationsElectrospun Nanofibers in Biomedical Applicationsbiodegradable polymer synthesis and properties

Preparation and in vivo degradation of controlled biodegradability of electrospun silk fibroin nanofiber mats

Kim, Ji Heui, Park, Chan Hum, Lee, Ok‐Joo, Lee, Jung‐Min, Kim, Jong Wook, Park, Young Hwan, Ki, Chang Seok·2012·Journal of Biomedical Materials Research Part A

Abstract

Controlled biodegradability of biomaterials is very important because different functionality and durability are required for various purposes and for specific tissues and organs. From this point of view, silk‐based biomaterials have poor usability because of uncontrollable degradability, even though silk fibroin (SF) is highly biocompatible and a number of studies on silk biomaterials have been published to date. In this study, we prepared SF nanofiber mats that were recrystallized in different ways. These mats were fabricated by electrospinning with ethanol/propanol mixtures of various blend ratios, and their biodegradabilities in vitro and in vivo were evaluated using rats. As a result, we can suggest an established method to modulate the degradability of SF nanofibrous materials based on long‐term (12 months) observations. In particular, we elucidated how the SF nanofibers are degraded and incorporated with surrounding tissue by observation of fluorescein isothiocyanate–labeled SF nanofiber in vivo. Our findings suggest a method for controlling the degradation rate of SF for medical applications. © 2012 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J Biomed Mater Res Part A 100A:3287–3295, 2012.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1002/jbm.a.34274

Cites

2 of 2 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • In vivo studies have shown that SF scaffolds can degrade entirely within 18 to 36 months, depending on their morphology, with nanofibers degrading as quickly as 8 weeks.

    “In vivo studies have shown that SF scaffolds can degrade entirely within 18 to 36 months, depending on their morphology, with nanofibers degrading as quickly as 8 weeks [94,96].”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Kim, J. H., Park, C. H., Lee, O., Lee, J., Kim, J. W., Park, Y. H., & Ki, C. S.
Affiliations
  • Hallym University (KR)
  • Seoul National University (KR)
  • Amorepacific (South Korea) (KR)
Corresponding author
  • Park, Chan Hum
  • Ki, Chang Seok
Venue
Journal of Biomedical Materials Research Part A
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2012-06-26
Volume
100A
Issue
12
Pages
3287-3295
ISSN
  • 1549-3296 (ISSN-L)
  • 1552-4965
OpenAlex
W1918162863
Cited by
61
References
2
Citations by year
2026: 5 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 6 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 4 · 2021: 5 · 2020: 9 · 2018: 4 · 2017: 2 · 2016: 1 · 2015: 5 · 2014: 11 · 2013: 1 · 2012: 1
FWCI
2.33
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Journal of Biomedical Materials Research Part A (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Materials Science › Biomaterials › Silk-based biomaterials and applications
  • Physical Sciences › Materials Science › Biomaterials › Electrospun Nanofibers in Biomedical Applications
  • Physical Sciences › Materials Science › Biomaterials › biodegradable polymer synthesis and properties
Keywords
silk fibroin, nanofiber mats, electrospinning, recrystallization, in vivo degradation, tissue integration, biocompatibility, silk-based biomaterials
MeSH terms
Ethanol, 1-Propanol, Animals, Biocompatible Materials, Crystallization, Fibroins, Male, Molecular Conformation, Rats, Sprague-Dawley, Endopeptidase K, Fluorescein, Prosthesis Implantation, Tissue Engineering, Rats, Tissue Scaffolds, Nanofibers

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review