Cited by 158Advanced Drug Delivery SystemsNanoparticle-Based Drug DeliveryAdvancements in Transdermal Drug Delivery

Comparison of ciprofloxacin hydrochloride‐loaded protein, lipid, and chitosan nanoparticles for drug delivery

Jain, Dharmendra, Banerjee, R.·2008·Journal of Biomedical Materials Research Part B: Applied Biomaterials

Abstract

The aim of the present study was to develop single dose delivery systems based on nanotechnology for prolonged antibiotic release in a controlled manner. Five different drug–carrier ratios of ciprofloxacin hydrochloride‐loaded nanoparticles of albumin, gelatin, chitosan (CS), and lipid [solid lipid nanoparticles (SLNs)] were prepared and characterized. Average particle size was found to be in the range of 73 ± 2 to 98 ± 44 nm for SLNs, 140 ± 7 to 175 ± 24 nm for albumin nanoparticles, 143 ± 18 to 184 ± 27 nm for gelatin nanoparticles, and 247 ± 48 to 322 ± 52 nm for CS nanoparticles. A drug‐to‐carrier ratio of 0.5:1 was preferred for CS nanoparticles having zeta potential of >20 mV and drug encapsulation of 35.01% ± 2.66%. Similarly, 0.6:1 ratio was preferred for albumin nanoparticles with zeta potential >16 mV and drug encapsulation 48.20% ± 3.01%. Zeta potentials of gelatin nanoparticles loaded with ciprofloxacin suggested that they were unstable and prone to flocculation. SLN with 0.25:1 drug carrier ratio showed 38.71% ± 2.38% drug entrapment and −28 ± 1 mV surface charge. All the nanoparticles showed sustained drug release avoiding “burst effect” of the free drugs for up to 120 h for albumin nanoparticles, 96 h for CS and gelatin nanoparticles, and 80 h for SLNs. The drug release profiles followed Higuchi model. Results suggest that CS nanoparticles and SLNs can act as promising carriers for sustained ciprofloxacin release in infective conditions. © 2007 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J Biomed Mater Res Part B: Appl Biomater, 2008

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1002/jbm.b.30994

Cites

34 of 34 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Jain, D., & Banerjee, R.
Affiliations
Indian Institute of Technology Bombay (IN)
Corresponding author
Banerjee, R.
Venue
Journal of Biomedical Materials Research Part B: Applied Biomaterials
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2007-12-20
Volume
86B
Issue
1
Pages
105-112
ISSN
  • 1552-4973 (ISSN-L)
  • 1552-4981
OpenAlex
W2074420216
Cited by
158
References
34
Citations by year
2025: 6 · 2024: 7 · 2023: 7 · 2022: 9 · 2021: 14 · 2020: 11 · 2019: 15 · 2018: 12 · 2017: 18 · 2016: 15 · 2015: 7 · 2014: 5 · 2013: 11 · 2012: 4
FWCI
3.11
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Journal of Biomedical Materials Research Part B Applied Biomaterials (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • DSpace (IIT Bombay) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutics › Pharmaceutical Science › Advanced Drug Delivery Systems
  • Physical Sciences › Materials Science › Biomaterials › Nanoparticle-Based Drug Delivery
  • Life Sciences › Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutics › Pharmaceutical Science › Advancements in Transdermal Drug Delivery
Keywords
ciprofloxacin hydrochloride, chitosan nanoparticles, solid lipid nanoparticles, albumin nanoparticles, gelatin nanoparticles, sustained drug release, encapsulation efficiency, zeta potential, Higuchi model, burst release, nanoparticle stability
MeSH terms
Albumins, Animals, Cattle, Ciprofloxacin, Drug Carriers, Gelatin, Lipids, Particle Size, Polymers, Scattering, Radiation, Serum Albumin, Drug Delivery Systems, Nanotechnology, Chitosan, Nanoparticles

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review