The DOI matches its Crossref record; 4 of the 4 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Assessment of incident spine and hip fractures in women and men using finite element analysis of CT scans
Open accessAbstract
Finite element analysis of computed tomography (CT) scans provides noninvasive estimates of bone strength at the spine and hip. To further validate such estimates clinically, we performed a 5-year case-control study of 1110 women and men over age 65 years from the AGES-Reykjavik cohort (case = incident spine or hip fracture; control = no incident spine or hip fracture). From the baseline CT scans, we measured femoral and vertebral strength, as well as bone mineral density (BMD) at the hip (areal BMD only) and lumbar spine (trabecular volumetric BMD only). We found that for incident radiographically confirmed spine fractures (n = 167), the age-adjusted odds ratio for vertebral strength was significant for women (2.8, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.8 to 4.3) and men (2.2, 95% CI 1.5 to 3.2) and for men remained significant (p = 0.01) independent of vertebral trabecular volumetric BMD. For incident hip fractures (n = 171), the age-adjusted odds ratio for femoral strength was significant for women (4.2, 95% CI 2.6 to 6.9) and men (3.5, 95% CI 2.3 to 5.3) and remained significant after adjusting for femoral neck areal BMD in women and for total hip areal BMD in both sexes; fracture classification improved for women by combining femoral strength with femoral neck areal BMD (p = 0.002). For both sexes, the probabilities of spine and hip fractures were similarly high at the BMD-based interventional thresholds for osteoporosis and at corresponding preestablished thresholds for “fragile bone strength” (spine: women ≤ 4500 N, men ≤ 6500 N; hip: women ≤ 3000 N, men ≤ 3500 N). Because it is well established that individuals over age 65 years who have osteoporosis at the hip or spine by BMD criteria should be considered at high risk of fracture, these results indicate that individuals who have fragile bone strength at the hip or spine should also be considered at high risk of fracture. © 2014 American Society for Bone and Mineral Research.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Updated Data on Proximal Femur Bone Mineral Levels of US Adults
Looker, A. C., Wahner, H. W., Dunn, W. L., Calvo, M. S., Harris, T. B., Heyse, S. P., Johnston Jr, C. C., & Lindsay, R. (1998) · Osteoporosis International · doi:10.1007/s001980050093 · Cited by 1,121 · cited 3×
“Because DXAwas not acquired for this study, we used the CT scans tomeasure a Hologic‐equivalent areal BMD (in g/cm2) at the femoral neck and total hip regions and associated T‐scores, using a similar approach as reported elsewhere (Fig.”
MethodInfluentialSelf-citationAge, Gene/Environment Susceptibility-Reykjavik Study: multidisciplinary applied phenomics
Harris, T. B., Launer, L. J., Eiriksdottir, G., Kjartansson, O., Jonsson, P. V., Sigurdsson, G., Thorgeirsson, G., Aspelund, T., Garcia, M. E., Cotch, M. F., et al. (2007) · American Journal of Epidemiology · doi:10.1093/aje/kwk115 · Cited by 592
Self-citationInternational Society for Clinical Densitometry 2007 Adult and Pediatric Official Positions
Lewiecki, E. M., Gordon, C. M., Baim, S., Leonard, M. B., Bishop, N. J., Bianchi, M.-L., Kalkwarf, H. J., Langman, C. B., Plotkin, H., Rauch, F., et al. (2008) · Bone · doi:10.1016/j.bone.2008.08.106 · Cited by 583
King, A. B., & Fiorentino, D. M. (2011) · Health Affairs · doi:10.1377/hlthaff.2011.0233 · Cited by 105
Cited by
Improved prediction of incident vertebral fractures using opportunistic QCT compared to DXA
Löffler, M. T., Jacob, A., Valentinitsch, A., Rienmüller, A., Zimmer, C., Ryang, Y.-M., Baum, T., & Kirschke, J. S. (2019) · European Radiology · doi:10.1007/s00330-019-06018-w · Cited by 197
X-ray-based quantitative osteoporosis imaging at the spine
Löffler, M. T., Sollmann, N., Mei, K., Valentinitsch, A., Noël, P. B., Kirschke, J. S., & Baum, T. (2020) · Osteoporosis International · doi:10.1007/s00198-019-05212-2 · Cited by 114
Prediction of incident vertebral fracture using CT-based finite element analysis
Allaire, B. T., Lu, D., Johannesdottir, F., Kopperdahl, D., Keaveny, T. M., Jarraya, M., Guermazi, A., Bredella, M. A., Samelson, E. J., Kiel, D. P., et al. (2019) · Osteoporosis International · doi:10.1007/s00198-018-4716-1 · Cited by 95
Self-citation
Metadata
- Authors
- Kopperdahl, D. L., Aspelund, T., Hoffmann, P. F., Sigurdsson, S., Siggeirsdottir, K., Harris, T. B., Gudnason, V., & Keaveny, T. M.
- Venue
- Journal of Bone and Mineral Research
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press (OUP)
- Published
- 2013-08-16
- Volume
- 29
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 570-580
- ISSN
- 0884-0431 (ISSN-L)
- 1523-4681
- OpenAlex
- W1792995416
- Cited by
- 286
- References
- 4
- FWCI
- 19.40
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Assessment of incident spine and hip fractures in women and men using finite element analysis of CT scans. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1002/jbmr.2069
- The paper
- Kopperdahl, D. L., Aspelund, T., Hoffmann, P. F., Sigurdsson, S., Siggeirsdottir, K., Harris, T. B., Gudnason, V., & Keaveny, T. M. (2014). Assessment of incident spine and hip fractures in women and men using finite element analysis of CT scans. Journal of Bone and Mineral Research. https://doi.org/10.1002/jbmr.2069
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.