The DOI matches its Crossref record; 4 of the 4 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
X‐ray fluorescence microprobe imaging in biology and medicine
Abstract
Characteristic X‐ray fluorescence is a technique that can be used to establish elemental concentrations for a large number of different chemical elements simultaneously in different locations in cell and tissue samples. Exposing the samples to an X‐ray beam is the basis of X‐ray fluorescence microscopy (XFM). This technique provides the excellent trace element sensitivity; and, due to the large penetration depth of hard X‐rays, an opportunity to image whole cells and quantify elements on a per cell basis. Moreover, because specimens prepared for XFM do not require sectioning, they can be investigated close to their natural, hydrated state with cryogenic approaches. Until several years ago, XFM was not widely available to bio‐medical communities, and rarely offered resolution better then several microns. This has changed drastically with the development of third‐generation synchrotrons. Recent examples of elemental imaging of cells and tissues show the maturation of XFM imaging technique into an elegant and informative way to gain insight into cellular processes. Future developments of XFM—building of new XFM facilities with higher resolution, higher sensitivity or higher throughput will further advance studies of native elemental makeup of cells and provide the biological community including the budding area of bionanotechnology with a tool perfectly suited to monitor the distribution of metals including nanovectors and measure the results of interactions between the nanovectors and living cells and tissues. J. Cell. Biochem. 99: 1489–1502, 2006. © 2006 Wiley‐Liss, Inc.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Cancer nanotechnology: opportunities and challenges
Ferrari, M. (2005) · Nature Reviews Cancer · doi:10.1038/nrc1566 · Cited by 4,558
Iron, brain ageing and neurodegenerative disorders
Zecca, L., Youdim, M. B. H., Riederer, P., Connor, J. R., & Crichton, R. R. (2004) · Nature Reviews Neuroscience · doi:10.1038/nrn1537 · Cited by 1,801
Iron-Source Preference of Staphylococcus aureus Infections
Skaar, E. P., Humayun, M., Bae, T., DeBord, K. L., & Schneewind, O. (2004) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.1099930 · Cited by 440
House, E., Collingwood, J., Khan, A., Korchazkina, O., Berthon, G., & Exley, C. (2004) · Journal of Alzheimer's Disease · doi:10.3233/jad-2004-6310 · Cited by 294
Cited by
Recent developments in ruthenium anticancer drugs
Levina, A., Mitra, A., & Lay, P. A. (2009) · Metallomics · doi:10.1039/b904071d · Cited by 592
Scintillating Nanoparticles as Energy Mediators for Enhanced Photodynamic Therapy
Kamkaew, A., Chen, F., Zhan, Y., Majewski, R. L., & Cai, W. (2016) · ACS Nano · doi:10.1021/acsnano.6b01401 · Cited by 355
Fahrni, C. J. (2007) · Current Opinion in Chemical Biology · doi:10.1016/j.cbpa.2007.02.039 · Cited by 297
Grover, K., Koblova, A., Pezacki, A. T., Chang, C. J., & New, E. J. (2024) · Chemical Reviews · doi:10.1021/acs.chemrev.3c00819 · Cited by 129
Metadata
- Authors
- Paunesku, T., Vogt, S., Maser, J., Lai, B., & Woloschak, G.
- Venue
- Journal of Cellular Biochemistry
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2006-09-27
- Volume
- 99
- Issue
- 6
- Pages
- 1489-1502
- ISSN
- 0730-2312 (ISSN-L)
- 1097-4644
- OpenAlex
- W2161181985
- Cited by
- 251
- References
- 4
- FWCI
- 9.66
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: X‐ray fluorescence microprobe imaging in biology and medicine. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1002/jcb.21047
- The paper
- Paunesku, T., Vogt, S., Maser, J., Lai, B., & Woloschak, G. (2006). X‐ray fluorescence microprobe imaging in biology and medicine. Journal of Cellular Biochemistry. https://doi.org/10.1002/jcb.21047
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.