The DOI matches its Crossref record; 23 of the 24 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
AutoDock Vina: Improving the speed and accuracy of docking with a new scoring function, efficient optimization, and multithreading
Open accessAbstract
AutoDock Vina, a new program for molecular docking and virtual screening, is presented. AutoDock Vina achieves an approximately two orders of magnitude speed‐up compared with the molecular docking software previously developed in our lab (AutoDock 4), while also significantly improving the accuracy of the binding mode predictions, judging by our tests on the training set used in AutoDock 4 development. Further speed‐up is achieved from parallelism, by using multithreading on multicore machines. AutoDock Vina automatically calculates the grid maps and clusters the results in a way transparent to the user. © 2009 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J Comput Chem 2010
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“each of four different vitamins (riboflavin, biotin, thiamine, and folate) were docked into the binding pocket of MMSYN1_0877.”
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Kennedy, J., & Eberhart, R. (2002) · Proceedings of ICNN'95 - International Conference on Neural Networks · doi:10.1109/icnn.1995.488968 · Cited by 58,192
Adaptation in Natural and Artificial Systems
Holland, J. H. (1992) · The MIT Press eBooks · doi:10.7551/mitpress/1090.001.0001 · Cited by 47,340
Optimization by Simulated Annealing
Kirkpatrick, S., Gelatt, C. D., & Vecchi, M. P. (1983) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.220.4598.671 · Cited by 45,134
AutoDock4 and AutoDockTools4: Automated docking with selective receptor flexibility
Morris, G. M., Huey, R., Lindstrom, W., Sanner, M. F., Belew, R. K., Goodsell, D. S., & Olson, A. J. (2009) · Journal of Computational Chemistry · doi:10.1002/jcc.21256 · Cited by 26,294
Self-citationA new optimizer using particle swarm theory
Eberhart, R., & Kennedy, J. (2002) · MHS'95. Proceedings of the Sixth International Symposium on Micro Machine and Human Science · doi:10.1109/mhs.1995.494215 · Cited by 16,067
Braun, W. J., & Murdoch, D. J. (2021) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/9781108993456.011 · Cited by 14,099
Nocedal, J., & Wright, S. J. (1999) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/b98874 · Cited by 9,563
Abagyan, R. A., Totrov, M. M., & Kuznetsov, D. (1994) · Journal of Computational Chemistry · doi:10.1002/jcc.540150503 · Cited by 1,718
The statistical-thermodynamic basis for computation of binding affinities: a critical review
Gilson, M. K., Given, J. A., Bush, B. L., & McCammon, J. A. (1997) · Biophysical Journal · doi:10.1016/s0006-3495(97)78756-3 · Cited by 1,222
Wang, R., Lai, L., & Wang, S. (2002) · Journal of Computer-Aided Molecular Design · doi:10.1023/a:1016357811882 · Cited by 1,185
Flagged first, then by citations
1 of the 24 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.
Research works printed but not linked: 2
- Vanopdenbosch N., 1985, J Mol Graph, 3, 110
- Austern M. H., 1999, Generic Programming and the STL
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Accurate structure prediction of biomolecular interactions with AlphaFold 3
Abramson, J., Adler, J., Dunger, J., Evans, R., Green, T., Pritzel, A., Ronneberger, O., Willmore, L., Ballard, A. J., Bambrick, J., et al. (2024) · Nature · doi:10.1038/s41586-024-07487-w · Cited by 15,861
“Even so, AF3 greatly outperforms classical docking tools such as Vina 37,38 even while not using any structural inputs (Fisher’s exact test, P = 2.27 × 10 −13 ) and greatly outperforms all other true blind docking like RoseTTAFold All-Atom ( P = 4.45 × 10 −25 ).”
BackgroundInfluentialAutoDock Vina 1.2.0: New Docking Methods, Expanded Force Field, and Python Bindings
Eberhardt, J., Santos‐Martins, D., Tillack, A. F., & Forli, S. (2021) · Journal of Chemical Information and Modeling · doi:10.1021/acs.jcim.1c00203 · Cited by 8,292
UCSF ChimeraX: Meeting modern challenges in visualization and analysis
Goddard, T. D., Huang, C. C., Meng, E. C., Pettersen, E. F., Couch, G. S., Morris, J. H., & Ferrin, T. E. (2018) · Protein Science · doi:10.1002/pro.3235 · Cited by 5,267
Small-Molecule Library Screening by Docking with PyRx
Dallakyan, S., & Olson, A. J. (2014) · Methods in molecular biology · doi:10.1007/978-1-4939-2269-7_19 · Cited by 4,244
Self-citationMolecular Docking: A Powerful Approach for Structure-Based Drug Discovery
Meng, X.-Y., Zhang, H.-X., Mezei, M., & Cui, M. (2011) · Current Computer Aided-Drug Design · doi:10.2174/157340911795677602 · Cited by 3,771
Highly accurate protein structure prediction for the human proteome
Tunyasuvunakool, K., Adler, J., Wu, Z., Green, T., Zielinski, M., Žídek, A., Bridgland, A., Cowie, A., Meyer, C., Laydon, A., et al. (2021) · Nature · doi:10.1038/s41586-021-03828-1 · Cited by 3,025
Computational protein-ligand docking and virtual drug screening with the AutoDock suite
Forli, S., Huey, R., Pique, M. E., Sanner, M. F., Goodsell, D., & Olson, A. (2016) · Nature Protocols · doi:10.1038/nprot.2016.051 · Cited by 2,536
Self-citationLigand docking and binding site analysis with PyMOL and Autodock/Vina
Seeliger, D., & de Groot, B. L. (2010) · Journal of Computer-Aided Molecular Design · doi:10.1007/s10822-010-9352-6 · Cited by 2,648
Molecular Docking: Shifting Paradigms in Drug Discovery
Pinzi, L., & Rastelli, G. (2019) · International Journal of Molecular Sciences · doi:10.3390/ijms20184331 · Cited by 2,537
Liu, Y., Yang, X., Gan, J., Chen, S., Xiao, Z. J., & Cao, Y. (2022) · Nucleic Acids Research · doi:10.1093/nar/gkac394 · Cited by 2,255
The rise of deep learning in drug discovery
Chen, H., Engkvist, O., Wang, Y., Olivecrona, M., & Blaschke, T. (2018) · Drug Discovery Today · doi:10.1016/j.drudis.2018.01.039 · Cited by 1,770
Software for molecular docking: a review
Pagadala, N. S., Syed, K., & Tuszynski, J. (2017) · Biophysical Reviews · doi:10.1007/s12551-016-0247-1 · Cited by 1,522
Computational approaches streamlining drug discovery
Sadybekov, A., & Katritch, V. (2023) · Nature · doi:10.1038/s41586-023-05905-z · Cited by 1,424
Lessons Learned in Empirical Scoring with smina from the CSAR 2011 Benchmarking Exercise
Koes, D. R., Baumgartner, M. P., & Camacho, C. J. (2013) · Journal of Chemical Information and Modeling · doi:10.1021/ci300604z · Cited by 1,180
Chu, C. T., Ji, J., Dagda, R. K., Jiang, J. F., Tyurina, Y. Y., Kapralov, A. A., Tyurin, V. A., Yanamala, N., Shrivastava, I. H., Mohammadyani, D., et al. (2013) · Nature Cell Biology · doi:10.1038/ncb2837 · Cited by 1,083
Unravelling the Role of O-glycans in Influenza A Virus Infection
Mayr, J., Lau, K., Lai, J. C. C., Gagarinov, I. A., Shi, Y. Y., McAtamney, S., Chan, R. W. Y., Nicholls, J. M., von Itzstein, M., & Haselhorst, T. (2018) · Scientific Reports · doi:10.1038/s41598-018-34175-3 · Cited by 1,068
Generalized biomolecular modeling and design with RoseTTAFold All-Atom
Krishna, R., Wang, J., Ahern, W., Sturmfels, P., Venkatesh, P., Kalvet, I., Lee, G. R., Morey-Burrows, F. S., Anishchenko, I., Humphreys, I. R., et al. (2024) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.adl2528 · Cited by 978
Wang, Z., Sun, H., Yao, X., Li, D., Xu, L., Li, Y., Tian, S., & Hou, T. (2016) · Physical Chemistry Chemical Physics · doi:10.1039/c6cp01555g · Cited by 946
K DEEP : Protein–Ligand Absolute Binding Affinity Prediction via 3D-Convolutional Neural Networks
Jiménez-Luna, J., Škalič, M., Martínez-Rosell, G., & Fabritiis, G. D. (2018) · Journal of Chemical Information and Modeling · doi:10.1021/acs.jcim.7b00650 · Cited by 946
Elfiky, A. A. (2020) · Life Sciences · doi:10.1016/j.lfs.2020.117592 · Cited by 929
CB-Dock: a web server for cavity detection-guided protein–ligand blind docking
Liu, Y., Grimm, M., Dai, W., Hou, M.-C., Xiao, Z. J., & Cao, Y. (2019) · Acta Pharmacologica Sinica · doi:10.1038/s41401-019-0228-6 · Cited by 927
Macromolecular modeling and design in Rosetta: recent methods and frameworks
Leman, J. K., Weitzner, B. D., Lewis, S. M., Adolf-Bryfogle, J., Alam, N., Alford, R. F., Aprahamian, M., Baker, D., Barlow, K. A., Barth, P., et al. (2020) · Nature Methods · doi:10.1038/s41592-020-0848-2 · Cited by 888
GNINA 1.0: molecular docking with deep learning
McNutt, A. T., Francoeur, P. G., Aggarwal, R., Masuda, T., Meli, R., Ragoza, M., Sunseri, J., & Koes, D. R. (2021) · Journal of Cheminformatics · doi:10.1186/s13321-021-00522-2 · Cited by 955
Comparative Assessment of Scoring Functions: The CASF-2016 Update
Su, M., Yang, Q., Du, Y., Feng, G., Liu, Z., Li, Y., & Wang, R. (2018) · Journal of Chemical Information and Modeling · doi:10.1021/acs.jcim.8b00545 · Cited by 870
DOCK 6: Impact of new features and current docking performance
Allen, W. J., Balius, T. E., Mukherjee, S., Brozell, S. R., Moustakas, D. T., Lang, P. T., Case, D. A., Kuntz, I. D., & Rizzo, R. C. (2015) · Journal of Computational Chemistry · doi:10.1002/jcc.23905 · Cited by 870
Protein–Ligand Scoring with Convolutional Neural Networks
Ragoza, M., Hochuli, J. E., Idrobo, E., Sunseri, J., & Koes, D. R. (2017) · Journal of Chemical Information and Modeling · doi:10.1021/acs.jcim.6b00740 · Cited by 853
Deep learning for computational chemistry
Goh, G. B., Hodas, N. O., & Vishnu, A. (2017) · Journal of Computational Chemistry · doi:10.1002/jcc.24764 · Cited by 809
Beck, B. R., Shin, B., Choi, Y., Park, S., & Kang, K. (2020) · Computational and Structural Biotechnology Journal · doi:10.1016/j.csbj.2020.03.025 · Cited by 815
Structural insight into molecular mechanism of poly(ethylene terephthalate) degradation
Joo, S., Cho, I., Seo, H., Son, H. F., Sagong, H.-Y., Shin, T. J., Choi, S. Y., Lee, S. Y., & Kim, K. (2018) · Nature Communications · doi:10.1038/s41467-018-02881-1 · Cited by 816
Binding Affinity via Docking: Fact and Fiction
Pantsar, T., & Poso, A. (2018) · Molecules · doi:10.3390/molecules23081899 · Cited by 844
Broad-specificity efflux pumps and their role in multidrug resistance of Gram-negative bacteria
Nikaido, H., & Pagès, J. (2011) · FEMS Microbiology Reviews · doi:10.1111/j.1574-6976.2011.00290.x · Cited by 770
Role of computer-aided drug design in modern drug discovery
Macalino, S. J. Y., Gosu, V., Hong, S., & Choi, S. (2015) · Archives of Pharmacal Research · doi:10.1007/s12272-015-0640-5 · Cited by 762
Anti-HCV, nucleotide inhibitors, repurposing against COVID-19
Elfiky, A. A. (2020) · Life Sciences · doi:10.1016/j.lfs.2020.117477 · Cited by 719
AutoDockFR: Advances in Protein-Ligand Docking with Explicitly Specified Binding Site Flexibility
Ravindranath, P. A., Forli, S., Goodsell, D. S., Olson, A. J., & Sanner, M. F. (2015) · PLoS Computational Biology · doi:10.1371/journal.pcbi.1004586 · Cited by 700
Self-citationImmune self-reactivity triggered by drug-modified HLA-peptide repertoire
Illing, P. T., Vivian, J. P., Dudek, N. L., Kostenko, L., Chen, Z., Bharadwaj, M., Miles, J. J., Kjer‐Nielsen, L., Gras, S., Williamson, N. A., et al. (2012) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature11147 · Cited by 694
Cao, Y., Liang, Y., Tanaka, K., Nguyen, C. T., Jedrzejczak, R. P., Joachimiak, A., & Stacey, G. S. (2014) · eLife · doi:10.7554/elife.03766 · Cited by 707
Tsubaki, M., Tomii, K., & Sese, J. (2019) · Bioinformatics · doi:10.1093/bioinformatics/bty535 · Cited by 688
Nguyen, P. H., Ramamoorthy, A., Sahoo, B. R., Zheng, J., Faller, P., Straub, J. E., Domínguez, L., Shea, J., Dokholyan, N. V., Simone, A. D., et al. (2021) · Chemical Reviews · doi:10.1021/acs.chemrev.0c01122 · Cited by 680
Sushko, I., Novotarskyi, S., Körner, R., Pandey, A. K., Rupp, M., Teetz, W., Brandmaier, S., Abdelaziz, A., Prokopenko, V. V., Tanchuk, V. Y., et al. (2011) · Journal of Computer-Aided Molecular Design · doi:10.1007/s10822-011-9440-2 · Cited by 707
Salmaso, V., & Moro, S. (2018) · Frontiers in Pharmacology · doi:10.3389/fphar.2018.00923 · Cited by 719
An open-source drug discovery platform enables ultra-large virtual screens
Gorgulla, C., Boeszoermenyi, A., Wang, Z., Fischer, P. D., Coote, P. W., Das, K. M., Malets, Y. S., Radchenko, D. S., Moroz, Y. S., Scott, D. A., et al. (2020) · Nature · doi:10.1038/s41586-020-2117-z · Cited by 677
PDB-wide collection of binding data: current status of the PDBbind database
Liu, Z., Li, Y., Han, L., Li, J., Liu, J., Zhao, Z., Nie, W., Liu, Y., & Wang, R. (2014) · Bioinformatics · doi:10.1093/bioinformatics/btu626 · Cited by 663
Computer-aided drug design platform using PyMOL
Lill, M. A., & Danielson, M. L. (2010) · Journal of Computer-Aided Molecular Design · doi:10.1007/s10822-010-9395-8 · Cited by 658
Key Topics in Molecular Docking for Drug Design
Torres, P. H. M., Sodero, A. C. R., Jofily, P., & Silva, F. P. (2019) · International Journal of Molecular Sciences · doi:10.3390/ijms20184574 · Cited by 703
rDock: A Fast, Versatile and Open Source Program for Docking Ligands to Proteins and Nucleic Acids
Carmona, S. R., Álvarez-García, D., Foloppe, N., Garmendia-Doval, A. B., Juhos, S., Schmidtke, P., Barril, X., Hubbard, R. E., & Morley, S. (2014) · PLoS Computational Biology · doi:10.1371/journal.pcbi.1003571 · Cited by 660
Computational methods in drug discovery
Leelananda, S. P., & Lindert, S. (2016) · Beilstein Journal of Organic Chemistry · doi:10.3762/bjoc.12.267 · Cited by 675
Sabe, V. T., Ntombela, T., Jhamba, L. A., Maguire, G. E. M., Govender, T., Naicker, T., & Kruger, H. G. (2021) · European Journal of Medicinal Chemistry · doi:10.1016/j.ejmech.2021.113705 · Cited by 665
Nano-targeted induction of dual ferroptotic mechanisms eradicates high-risk neuroblastoma
Hassannia, B., Wiernicki, B., Ingold, I., Qu, F., Herck, S. V., Tyurina, Y. Y., Bayır, H., Abhari, B. A., Angeli, J. P. F., Choi, S. M., et al. (2018) · Journal of Clinical Investigation · doi:10.1172/jci99032 · Cited by 633
Hsin, K., Ghosh, S., & Kitano, H. (2013) · PLoS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0083922 · Cited by 622
Fan, J., Fu, A., & Zhang, L. (2019) · Quantitative Biology · doi:10.1007/s40484-019-0172-y · Cited by 665
In silico methods and tools for drug discovery
Shaker, B., Ahmad, S., Lee, J., Jung, C., & Na, D. (2021) · Computers in Biology and Medicine · doi:10.1016/j.compbiomed.2021.104851 · Cited by 669
Uthman, L., Baartscheer, A., Bleijlevens, B., Schumacher, C. A., Fiolet, J. W. T., Koeman, A., Jancev, M., Hollmann, M. W., Weber, N. C., Coronel, R., et al. (2017) · Diabetologia · doi:10.1007/s00125-017-4509-7 · Cited by 633
Chen, Y.-C. (2015) · Trends in Pharmacological Sciences · doi:10.1016/j.tips.2014.12.001 · Cited by 611
Computer-Aided Drug Design Methods
Yu, W., & MacKerell, A. D. (2016) · Methods in molecular biology · doi:10.1007/978-1-4939-6634-9_5 · Cited by 599
Medicinal chemistry of indole derivatives: Current to future therapeutic prospectives
Kumari, A., & Singh, R. K. (2019) · Bioorganic Chemistry · doi:10.1016/j.bioorg.2019.103021 · Cited by 610
Structure-Based Virtual Screening: From Classical to Artificial Intelligence
Maia, E. H. B., de Assis, L. C., de Oliveira, T. A., da Silva, A. M., & Taranto, A. G. (2020) · Frontiers in Chemistry · doi:10.3389/fchem.2020.00343 · Cited by 623
Bugnon, M., Röhrig, U. F., Goullieux, M., Perez, M. A. S., Daina, A., Michielin, O. A., & Zoete, V. (2024) · Nucleic Acids Research · doi:10.1093/nar/gkae300 · Cited by 639
Molecular Docking: Challenges, Advances and its Use in Drug Discovery Perspective
Saikia, S., & Bordoloi, M. (2018) · Current Drug Targets · doi:10.2174/1389450119666181022153016 · Cited by 581
Cellular Red-Ox system in health and disease: The latest update
Jena, A. B., Samal, R. R., Bhol, N. K., & Duttaroy, A. K. (2023) · Biomedicine & Pharmacotherapy · doi:10.1016/j.biopha.2023.114606 · Cited by 587
A practical guide to large-scale docking
Bender, B. J., Gahbauer, S., Luttens, A., Lyu, J., Webb, C. M., Stein, R. M., Fink, E. A., Balius, T. E., Carlsson, J., Irwin, J. J., et al. (2021) · Nature Protocols · doi:10.1038/s41596-021-00597-z · Cited by 546
Limón, A. M. V., Aguilar-Toalá, J. E., & Liceaga, A. M. (2022) · Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry · doi:10.1021/acs.jafc.1c06110 · Cited by 534
Glucose transporters in cancer – from tumor cells to the tumor microenvironment
Ancey, P., Contat, C., & Meylan, E. (2018) · FEBS Journal · doi:10.1111/febs.14577 · Cited by 531
Wallach, I., Dzamba, M., & Heifets, A. (2015) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.1510.02855
Fast docking using the CHARMM force field with EADock DSS
Grosdidier, A., Zoete, V., & Michielin, O. A. (2011) · Journal of Computational Chemistry · doi:10.1002/jcc.21797 · Cited by 501
Targeting Antibiotic Resistance
Chellat, M. F., Raguž, L., & Riedl, R. (2016) · Angewandte Chemie International Edition · doi:10.1002/anie.201506818 · Cited by 505
PotentialNet for Molecular Property Prediction
Feinberg, E. N., Sur, D., Wu, Z., Husic, B. E., Mai, H., Li, Y., Sun, S., Yang, J., Ramsundar, B., & Pande, V. S. (2018) · ACS Central Science · doi:10.1021/acscentsci.8b00507 · Cited by 490
Sandstrom, A., Peigné, C.-M., Léger, A., Crooks, J. E., Gatto–Konczak, F. D., Gesnel, M.-C., Breathnach, R., Bonneville, M., Scotet, E., & Adams, E. J. (2014) · Immunity · doi:10.1016/j.immuni.2014.03.003 · Cited by 503
Evaluation of AutoDock and AutoDock Vina on the CASF-2013 Benchmark
Gaillard, T. (2018) · Journal of Chemical Information and Modeling · doi:10.1021/acs.jcim.8b00312 · Cited by 489
Bell, E. W., & Zhang, Y. (2019) · Journal of Cheminformatics · doi:10.1186/s13321-019-0362-7 · Cited by 521
The Art and Science of Molecular Docking
Paggi, J. M., Pandit, A., & Dror, R. O. (2024) · Annual Review of Biochemistry · doi:10.1146/annurev-biochem-030222-120000 · Cited by 546
Takahashi, N., Duprez, L., Grootjans, S., Cauwels, A., Nerinckx, W., DuHadaway, J. B., Goossens, V, Roelandt, R., Van Hauwermeiren, F., Libert, C., et al. (2012) · Cell Death & Disease · doi:10.1038/cddis.2012.176 · Cited by 465
Zhao, R., Ma, T., Zhao, S., Rong, H., Tian, Y., & Zhu, G. (2019) · Chemical Engineering Journal · doi:10.1016/j.cej.2019.122893 · Cited by 460
Autodock Vina Adopts More Accurate Binding Poses but Autodock4 Forms Better Binding Affinity
Nguyen, N. T., Nguyen, T. H., Pham, T. N. H., Nguyen, H. T., Bay, M. V., Quân, P. M., Nam, P. C., Vu, V. V., & Ngô, S. T. (2019) · Journal of Chemical Information and Modeling · doi:10.1021/acs.jcim.9b00778 · Cited by 461
Accelerating A uto D ock 4 with GPUs and Gradient-Based Local Search
Santos‐Martins, D., Solis-Vasquez, L., Tillack, A. F., Sanner, M. F., Koch, A., & Forli, S. (2021) · Journal of Chemical Theory and Computation · doi:10.1021/acs.jctc.0c01006 · Cited by 480
Natural product-derived phytochemicals as potential agents against coronaviruses: A review
Mani, J. S., Johnson, J. B., Steel, J. C., Broszczak, D. A., Neilsen, P. M., Walsh, K. B., & Naiker, M. (2020) · Virus Research · doi:10.1016/j.virusres.2020.197989 · Cited by 451
MCC950 closes the active conformation of NLRP3 to an inactive state
Tapia‐Abellán, A., Angosto-Bazarra, D., Martínez‐Banaclocha, H., de Torre‐Minguela, C., Cerón‐Carrasco, J. P., Pérez‐Sánchez, H., Aróstegui, J. I., & Pelegrı́n, P. (2019) · Nature Chemical Biology · doi:10.1038/s41589-019-0278-6 · Cited by 448
Accessing non-natural reactivity by irradiating nicotinamide-dependent enzymes with light
Emmanuel, M. A., Greenberg, N. R., Oblinsky, D. G., & Hyster, T. K. (2016) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature20569 · Cited by 449
Vitamin D-Mediated Hypercalcemia: Mechanisms, Diagnosis, and Treatment
Tebben, P. J., Singh, R. J., & Kumar, R. (2016) · Endocrine Reviews · doi:10.1210/er.2016-1070 · Cited by 443
Curcumin-loaded biodegradable polymeric micelles for colon cancer therapy in vitro and in vivo
Gou, M., Men, K., Shi, H., Xiang, M., Zhang, J., Song, J. T., Long, J., Wan, Y., Luo, F., Zhao, X., et al. (2011) · Nanoscale · doi:10.1039/c0nr00758g · Cited by 437
An Overview of Scoring Functions Used for Protein–Ligand Interactions in Molecular Docking
Li, J., Fu, A., & Zhang, L. (2019) · Interdisciplinary Sciences Computational Life Sciences · doi:10.1007/s12539-019-00327-w · Cited by 468
Chen, Y. W., Yiu, C.-P. B., & Wong, K. (2020) · F1000Research · doi:10.12688/f1000research.22457.2 · Cited by 432
Gavrish, E., Sit, C. S., Cao, S., Kandror, O., Spoering, A. L., Peoples, A. J., Ling, L. L., Fetterman, A., Hughes, D. E., Bissell, A., et al. (2014) · Chemistry & Biology · doi:10.1016/j.chembiol.2014.01.014 · Cited by 418
Pharmit: interactive exploration of chemical space
Sunseri, J., & Koes, D. R. (2016) · Nucleic Acids Research · doi:10.1093/nar/gkw287 · Cited by 426
Proença, C., Freitas, M., Ribeiro, D., Oliveira, E. F. T., Sousa, J. L. C., Tomé, S. M., Ramos, M. J., Silva, A. M. S., Fernandes, P. A., & Fernandes, E. (2017) · Journal of Enzyme Inhibition and Medicinal Chemistry · doi:10.1080/14756366.2017.1368503 · Cited by 432
Buttenschoen, M., Morris, G. M., & Deane, C. M. (2023) · Chemical Science · doi:10.1039/d3sc04185a · Cited by 500
Rasouli, H., Ghazvini, S. M. B. H., Adibi, H., & Khodarahmi, R. (2017) · Food & Function · doi:10.1039/c7fo00220c · Cited by 422
Vinardo: A Scoring Function Based on Autodock Vina Improves Scoring, Docking, and Virtual Screening
Quiroga, R., & Villarreal, M. A. (2016) · PLoS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0155183 · Cited by 428
Lim, J., Ryu, S., Park, K., Choe, Y. J., Ham, J., & Kim, W. Y. (2019) · Journal of Chemical Information and Modeling · doi:10.1021/acs.jcim.9b00387 · Cited by 411
The Enzymatic Oxidation of Graphene Oxide
Kotchey, G. P., Allen, B. L., Vedala, H., Yanamala, N. V. K., Kapralov, A. A., Tyurina, Y. Y., Klein‐Seetharaman, J., Kagan, V. E., & Star, A. (2011) · ACS Nano · doi:10.1021/nn103265h · Cited by 407
AMDock: a versatile graphical tool for assisting molecular docking with Autodock Vina and Autodock4
Tresanco, M. S. V., Valdés‐Tresanco, M. E., Valiente, P. A., & Moreno, E. (2020) · Biology Direct · doi:10.1186/s13062-020-00267-2 · Cited by 399
Dege, N., Gökçe, H., Doĝan, O. E., Alpaslan, G., Ağar, T., Muthu, S., & Sert, Y. (2022) · Colloids and Surfaces A Physicochemical and Engineering Aspects · doi:10.1016/j.colsurfa.2022.128311 · Cited by 397
Boosting docking-based virtual screening with deep learning.
Pereira, J. C., Caffarena, E. R., & dos Santos, C. N. (2016) · Journal of Chemical Information and Modeling · doi:10.1021/acs.jcim.6b00355 · Cited by 395
Rice cytochrome P450 MAX1 homologs catalyze distinct steps in strigolactone biosynthesis
Zhang, Y., van Dijk, A. D. J., Scaffidi, A., Flematti, G. R., Hofmann, M., Charnikhova, T. V., Verstappen, F. W. A., Hepworth, J., van der Krol, S., Leyser, O., et al. (2014) · Nature Chemical Biology · doi:10.1038/nchembio.1660 · Cited by 396
Machine-learning methods for ligand–protein molecular docking
Crampon, K., Giorkallos, A., Deldossi, M., Baud, S., & Steffenel, L. A. (2021) · Drug Discovery Today · doi:10.1016/j.drudis.2021.09.007 · Cited by 420
Kang, X., Liu, C., Ding, Y., Ni, Y., Ji, F., Lau, H. C. H., Jiang, L., Sung, J. J., Wong, S. H., & Yu, J. (2023) · Gut · doi:10.1136/gutjnl-2023-330291 · Cited by 394
Deep learning in drug discovery: an integrative review and future challenges
Askr, H., Elgeldawi, E., Ella, H. A., Elshaier, Y. A. M. M., Gomaa, M. M., & Hassanien, A. E. (2022) · Artificial Intelligence Review · doi:10.1007/s10462-022-10306-1 · Cited by 428
Computational approaches in target identification and drug discovery
Κάτσιλα, Θ., Spyroulias, G. A., Patrinos, G. P., & Matsoukas, M. (2016) · Computational and Structural Biotechnology Journal · doi:10.1016/j.csbj.2016.04.004 · Cited by 408
Currin, A., Swainston, N., Day, P. J., & Kell, D. B. (2014) · Chemical Society Reviews · doi:10.1039/c4cs00351a · Cited by 393
Luo, P., Liu, D., Zhang, Q., Yang, F., Wong, Y., Xia, F., Zhang, J., Chen, J., Tian, Y., Yang, C., et al. (2021) · Acta Pharmaceutica Sinica B · doi:10.1016/j.apsb.2021.12.007 · Cited by 394
Ligand-binding properties of a juvenile hormone receptor, Methoprene-tolerant
Charles, J., Iwema, T., Epa, V. C., Takaki, K., Ryneš, J., & Jindra, M. (2011) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.1116123109 · Cited by 394
Metadata
- Authors
- Trott, O., & Olson, A. J.
- Affiliations
- Scripps Research Institute (US)
- Corresponding author
- Olson, Arthur J.
- ORCID
- Olson, Arthur J.
- Venue
- Journal of Computational Chemistry
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2009-06-04
- Volume
- 31
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 455-461
- ISSN
- 0192-8651 (ISSN-L)
- 1096-987X
- PMC
- PMC3041641
- OpenAlex
- W2134967712
- Cited by
- 38,412
- References
- 24
- Citations by year
- 2026: 4951 · 2025: 5289 · 2024: 4793 · 2023: 4241 · 2022: 4250 · 2021: 3687 · 2020: 2903 · 2019: 1858 · 2018: 1560 · 2017: 1225 · 2016: 1035 · 2015: 832 · 2014: 613 · 2013: 508 · 2012: 346
- FWCI
- 212.46
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
- doi.org
- Locations
- Journal of Computational Chemistry (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
- Funders
- National Institutes of Health
- National Institute of General Medical Sciences (R01GM069832)
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutics › Drug Discovery › Computational Drug Discovery Methods
- Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics › Advanced Chemical Physics Studies
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Protein Structure and Dynamics
- Keywords
- AutoDock Vina, molecular docking, virtual screening, scoring functions, binding mode prediction, multithreading, multi-core parallelization, grid map
- MeSH terms
- Algorithms, Automation, Binding Sites, Hydrogen Bonding, Ligands, Sensitivity and Specificity, Software, Solvents, Thermodynamics, Time Factors, Computational Biology, Molecular Dynamics Simulation, Hydrophobic and Hydrophilic Interactions
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review